|
|
Posts: 164
| Here is a video of my product range, the Black Curly Sue in this video is the SHALLOW version that somebody wanted to see on a different thread, it has a much slower sink rate, you can even walk the dog with it. The Curly and Suzy Spins are also on the video, but it looks like the blades aren’t spinning that fast, they really are, but the camera can’t keep up and thus it looks a lot slower. |
|
|
|
Posts: 164
| I can’t remember how to add the You Tube Video, here is the URL if anyone else can do it. I will up-load it to Muskie First server later tonight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hebK4wubnbE |
|
|
|
Posts: 164
| I forgot to mention that the OLD mag dawg (which is just under 7oz) is just a tiny bit bigger than the 9” Curly Sue. The new mag dawgs (now 9oz) have grown in size and are just a tiny bit smaller than the 11” Curly Sue. So in reality the 11” Curly Sue is not that different in weight and profile now of a mag dawg. |
|
|
|
Posts: 1425
Location: St. Lawrence River | They look good I'll be looking to get my hands on one before June |
|
|
|
Posts: 104
Location: Hudson, WI | Nice video. Will shack attack be at the minnesota show? |
|
|
|
Location: Northern Wisconsin | New mag dawgs? I know they are making them with new plastic but they are bigger/ heavier now?? Anyone have pics to compare the size of a new mag dawg to an old one. |
|
|
|
Posts: 1243
Location: Musky Tackle Online, MN | Nice video, Andy. The 9 oz. size stated on the new Mag Dawgs is correct. They're the same size as the old ones as far as I can tell (length and overall appearance), but they are in fact heavier. I'm guessing this is simply due to the added bulk of the internal harness and perhaps the density of the new plastic. My postal scale has all of them coming in right around 9 ounces. I had the old ones coming in at about 8 ounces. Although I think some even older models may have been even lighter as I've seen weights listed as light as 6 to 7 ounces on Mags back in the day.
Aaron
Edited by AWH 3/1/2010 1:22 PM
|
|
|