Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> ID this fish?
 
ID this fish?
OptionResults
Northern Pike51 Votes - [33.12%]
Hybrid Muskellunge72 Votes - [46.75%]
Muskellunge8 Votes - [5.19%]
Chain Pickeral15 Votes - [9.74%]
None of the above2 Votes - [1.3%]
chain pickerell hybrid pike4 Votes - [2.6%]
Esox tiemani2 Votes - [1.3%]
Add your own option:

Message Subject: ID this fish?
BLS
Posted 6/1/2007 7:55 PM (#259024)
Subject: ID this fish?




Posts: 2


Just by looking at the picture of this 16" fish - what is it?

What can be told from the markings?


Thanks,

BLS


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(BigAlkali18.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments BigAlkali18.jpg (89KB - 153 downloads)
Guest
Posted 6/1/2007 8:13 PM (#259026 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?


100% pike
JKahler
Posted 6/1/2007 9:25 PM (#259031 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?




Posts: 1289


Location: WI
how many pores are under the jaw? was the tail pointed?
MuskyHopeful
Posted 6/1/2007 9:32 PM (#259033 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?





Posts: 2865


Location: Brookfield, WI
That's Bill, from Brainerd. From his color it looks like he's been hittin' the sauce pretty hard again. Nice guy. Really likes to have a good time.

Kevin

I'm not angry, I'm hungry.
Don Pfeiffer
Posted 6/1/2007 9:41 PM (#259035 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?




Posts: 929


Location: Rhinelander.
For sure musky.......Looks so much like small ones that I have helped stock.


Pfeiff
MuskyStalker
Posted 6/1/2007 10:32 PM (#259039 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 317


light markings on dark background...Pike all the way.
Dacron + Dip
Posted 6/2/2007 2:06 AM (#259050 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?


100% pike.
mad4skies
Posted 6/2/2007 8:29 AM (#259059 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?




Posts: 20


Location: Sheboygan, WI
The markings of a pike are light oval or round spots on dark back, but they must be horizontal, these are vertical and look more like bars than spots.
The fins of a pike are mostly round as these look pointed, I believe it is a young tiger, Mark.
Clark A
Posted 6/2/2007 8:47 AM (#259060 - in reply to #259050)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?




Posts: 618


Location: Bloomington, MN
The fins do look a bit pointy, but I'm guessing it's a northern. Was the clarity of the water of lake that this fish came from on muddy/dingey side? I've always wanted to fish Wabigoon just to try to get a 40"+ pike for the wall (replica of course!). Fittante's artistic capabilities would shine, and he would save $ on paint.
tcbetka
Posted 6/2/2007 10:38 AM (#259064 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?




Location: Green Bay, WI
My first thought was a hybrid, but after some research I think it's probably a northern pike. If you look at Becker's "Fishes of Wisconsin" here:

http://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/greatlakesfish/becker.html

...he confirms (p398 & p405) that northerns have oblique light bars on a dark background, while muskies tend to be the other way around. But I also noticed something I had apparently forgotten--that female tigers can be fertile. Wouldn't it be wild if this fish was the product of a cross between a female tiger and a male northern pike??

It would be nice to count the mandibular pores and see the tail better, but I would have to go with Esox lucius in this case...

TB

Edited by tcbetka 6/2/2007 10:43 AM
KARLOUTDOORS
Posted 6/2/2007 10:56 AM (#259065 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?





Posts: 956


Location: Home of the 2016 World Series Champion Cubs
MUSKY.
BLS
Posted 6/2/2007 11:24 AM (#259068 - in reply to #259065)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?




Posts: 2


OK....I've seen enough votes and comments that I'll include more info. Just wanted to see how many opinions there would be.



- Juvenile Pike apparently often have (although I've never seen it around here) vertical-bar markings, such as these.
- This particular fish had 8 mandibular pores.
- The lake in question has never been stocked with muskies.
- It has a decent (size wise) population of pike.
- The lake has a sand bottom. Very little weed cover throughout the lake, except in the area this fish was caught.
- Tiger muskies haven't been stocked in this state since 2000.
- The closest possible source of muskellunge (would have been) a lake not too far away which crashed last year due to low water.


Bucket biology with the unlikely reproduction bonus?

Hard to imagine in these parts but....8 pores....


?





muskie! nut
Posted 6/2/2007 11:33 AM (#259070 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 2894


Location: Yahara River Chain
I can remember when the DNR had a display tank at the Madison Fishing EXPO a few years ago and I swore that the juvenile esox they had in the tank was a musky or a hybrid due to the vertical markings like this fish above displays. Even got into a debate with the DNR Field tech about it. It was a pike.
Marshall
Posted 6/2/2007 12:15 PM (#259073 - in reply to #259070)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 406


Location: Stones throw away...finally!!
Not trying to steal the thread, but I was forwarded these two pics from an IDNR biologist, and thought they went well with the post. They were netted this spring in the gill nets either in Spirit Lake or the Okoboji's. They are both pike, and the one is classified as a silver, but I have never seen anything like the second one. The biologist stated that it is just differences in pigmentation. The second one could be one of the coolest marked fish I have seen. Has anyone else ever seen anything like it.


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

butterwheels
Posted 6/2/2007 12:20 PM (#259075 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 143


that's pretty spiffy.
bn
Posted 6/2/2007 1:40 PM (#259076 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?


pike
muskie! nut
Posted 6/2/2007 1:43 PM (#259077 - in reply to #259073)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 2894


Location: Yahara River Chain
Marshall - 6/2/2007 12:15 PMThey were netted this spring in the gill nets either in Spirit Lake or the Okoboji's.



I really doubt that they used gill nets as fish are often kill by such a method. Most likely used fyke nets where a single net leads to deeper water and a series of hooped nets don't allow the fish to back out.

I have caught blue pike in Canada and they look pretty cool, that 2nd pic looks more like a chain pickerel than a northern.
Reef Hawg
Posted 6/2/2007 2:04 PM (#259080 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?


pike.
Derrys
Posted 6/2/2007 2:55 PM (#259083 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?


Marshall, I've caught two fish from the same body of water that bear a similar resemblance to the fish in the second photo you posted. I thought they were Pikerel, but was not sure. I e-mailed a photo of one of the fish to Rob Kimm, but since it was two or three years ago, I can't recall what he said. They were very different from the usual Pike colorings, but not really Muskie-looking either. Wierd.
Larry Ramsell
Posted 6/3/2007 12:47 PM (#259155 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?




Posts: 1291


Location: Hayward, Wisconsin
First fish a pike "apparently" in "ghost phase". Saw a 33 1/2-pound muskie like that during netting operations in 1986.

Marshall, that second photo is only the second I have ever seen. The first came from Eagle Lake and former Minnesota Research Biologist Bob Strand thought it may have been an F2 back-cross hybrid (between a muskie and a pike). Okey has both, so it is quite possible. The first photo definately a "silver" or "blue" pike as some call them. At one time Okey had about 5% of the pike population silvers according to a research study. At one time many years ago, "silvers" were thought to be "muskies" in the Park Rapids area of Minnesota.



Edited by Larry Ramsell 6/3/2007 12:51 PM
crackpot
Posted 6/3/2007 2:14 PM (#259169 - in reply to #259077)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 214


Location: Central Iowa
Actually the IDNR uses gill nets quite frequently and I've never even seen them use fyke nets.

Edited by crackpot 6/3/2007 2:16 PM
dougj
Posted 6/3/2007 8:30 PM (#259199 - in reply to #259169)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 906


Location: Warroad, Mn
Gill nets are frequently used for fishery samples, and if checked frequently in cool water situations many fish are releasable.

I don't know what this fish is for sure. It would help to know the number of sensory pores under it's chin, the scaling on it's cheeks, and the look of the tail (pointy or rounded). X-rays would prove for sure as muskies, northerns and hybreds have different numbers of vertebra.

I would guess northern, there's lots of color varations. But at this young age almost any Esox is possible

Doug Johnson
sworrall
Posted 6/4/2007 10:38 AM (#259276 - in reply to #259199)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 32886


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
I'd venture to guess pike from what I see, catch allot of them on 'pike only' water that look just like that. Many of the clay basin lakes in Canada put Pike out marked like that, too.
greg m
Posted 6/4/2007 12:37 PM (#259303 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 359


Location: Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
esox masquinongy
chitown
Posted 6/4/2007 1:12 PM (#259311 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?


I agree with sworrel it looks like pike I have seen in Wabigoon
Fishwizard
Posted 6/4/2007 1:20 PM (#259313 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?




Posts: 366


If this "Big Alkali" fish is from the Valentine Refuge lake by the same name then, I would say it is more likely a pikeral. Grass Pickeral are native and somewhat common to the area, although this fish is missing the typical tear drop marking over the eye, but otherwise looks pickeral. Just my personal opinion of course, but if it is then it is a fully grown specimen. I've caught a couple of Silver Pike like in the 2nd of the three photos on West Okoboji, and the lake is well known for Silvers. My complete guess about the 3rd would be some sort of mutated pike. Normal pike with genetic abnormality or mutation giving the unusual markings.
firstsixfeet
Posted 6/4/2007 4:30 PM (#259348 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?




Posts: 2361


That third picture is a beautiful fish. I would jump to a chain pickerel hybrid, of some type, for that one. They should have counted pores and checked the scale pattern. Waaaay pretty regardless. Thanks for posting these interesting pics. Any determination as to what we are really seeing here????

PS, depth of body and coarse features of the head make that first one look like a musky hybrid. If somebody gave me a 30 sec look that would be my guess.

Edited by firstsixfeet 6/4/2007 4:34 PM
sworrall
Posted 6/4/2007 4:48 PM (#259351 - in reply to #259348)
Subject: Re: ID this fish?





Posts: 32886


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
All grown up...


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(IMAG0030.JPG)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(DSCF0052.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments IMAG0030.JPG (70KB - 152 downloads)
Attachments DSCF0052.JPG (56KB - 149 downloads)
GregM
Posted 6/4/2007 6:04 PM (#259366 - in reply to #259024)
Subject: RE: ID this fish?





Posts: 1189


Location: Bagley,MN 56621
that second pic of marshall's almost looks like the same markings on JLong's son's pike in his thread.
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)