Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors -> tuffy esox magnum VS. esox ltd. | ![]() ![]() |
Message Subject: tuffy esox magnum VS. esox ltd. | |||
peedenmark7![]() |
| ||
curious if anyone can give me an overview what to expect out of the newer/larger tuffy esox magnum tiller VS. the old esox ltd. that I currently fish out of ? I ask because I am looking for a second boat to leave up north. I currently fish out of "old faithful" an '87 esox ltd with johnson 50hp tiller...and love the boat ! I found a super clean 2000 esox magnum tiller that I can get it for very very cheap..... I know the newer esox magnum boat is wider and a skoshe longer, but what benefits or drawbacks will I see in this boat vs the ltd ? thanks, john hartford/wi. [email protected] | |||
kevin![]() |
| ||
Posts: 1335 Location: Chicago, Beverly | I believe the Mag would have more storage, larger livewell and possibly be a bit more stable then the LTD. Rated for higher hp then a LTD so if its not already at max hp you can always upgrade to that where, if memory is right, your about there with the LTD with a 50hp. | ||
sworrall![]() |
| ||
Posts: 32934 Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | The Magnum is exactly the same length, but has the following features not found in the Esox: Timers, recirc, auto functions on livewell Wider 60" livewell Baitwell 20 gallon built in tank extra storage compartments Larger rod locker, wider full guage package rear port and starboard caps 60 HP tiller rating 135 HP console rating 10" wider V Pad running bottom Hope this helps! | ||
peedenmark7![]() |
| ||
Posts: 37 Location: wisconsin | steve, thanks much for the info | ||
setme31![]() |
| ||
Posts: 516 Location: Kildeer, IL | I own the same boat as you. 1987 Esox Ltd. Three things that bother me: 1) Non-Flat compartments. It is very hard to run the trolling motor when you have so many bumps and slippery surfaces on the bow. Plus, the rod locker and livewell are not flush with the rest of the bunks and front deck. 2) Narrow bunks. The bunks around the outside are too narrow to balance on. 3) No storage. The tiny storage compartment up front isn't enough. Once you get the life jackets in there, it is just about full. All of these issues are solved with the Magnum. Everything is flush, the bunks are nice and wide, and there is more storage. If I were you, I'd jump at the opportunity. | ||
sworrall![]() |
| ||
Posts: 32934 Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | The 2006 Esox LTD has flush lids, longer rod lockers, and a bit wider side tanks than the 80's models. | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] | ![]() ![]() |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |


Copyright © 2025 OutdoorsFIRST Media |