|
|
Posts: 279
Location: Central Wisconsin | wisskie - 1/31/2015 7:54 PM
Ive never used backing so 100 yards should be good.
You should really consider using some backing, even if only 5 yards. It will keep your line from slipping on the spool during hook sets. Either that or tape it very well. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1285
Location: Walker, MN | I like the 50 size for a down sizer rod. You probably wouldn't want to troll with it. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1283
| I use 80 also no issues. I like the paddle handle on the 50 6.4s for speed and since the lures are typically lighter it works great. I prefer the 60 5.4 with the powerhandle in the short setting for cranking power with 10s and heavy baits all day. |
|
| |
|
| Riverrat351 - 2/1/2015 6:45 AM
wisskie - 1/31/2015 7:54 PM
Ive never used backing so 100 yards should be good.
You should really consider using some backing, even if only 5 yards. It will keep your line from slipping on the spool during hook sets. Either that or tape it very well.
Ive never had issues with the line slipping on hook set. Has anybody ever experienced line spinning because you didnt have backing? Ive had buddies tell me i should use it but never really had an issue without it. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 84
| wisskie - 2/1/2015 5:54 PM
Riverrat351 - 2/1/2015 6:45 AM
wisskie - 1/31/2015 7:54 PM
Ive never used backing so 100 yards should be good.
You should really consider using some backing, even if only 5 yards. It will keep your line from slipping on the spool during hook sets. Either that or tape it very well.
Ive never had issues with the line slipping on hook set. Has anybody ever experienced line spinning because you didnt have backing? Ive had buddies tell me i should use it but never really had an issue without it.
I've had line slip without mono backing. I didn't know it was happening at first, just kept trying to tighten my drag. Put a little mono on there. Better safe than sorry |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1285
Location: Walker, MN | I have always just wrapped the spool with electrical tape. Yes, braid will slip on bare aluminum spools. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 29
Location: Romeo Michigan | Masqui-ninja - 2/1/2015 8:46 PM
I have always just wrapped the spool with electrical tape. Yes, braid will slip on bare aluminum spools.
I too have never had an issue with electrical tape.
Cheers
Jake |
|
| |
|
Posts: 866
Location: NE Ohio | for the life of me i just can't figure out why anyone would ever want to put more than 100 yds of expensive braid of any kind on a reel for muskie fishing. i've always used mono backing wound on tightly to get me to that depth on the reel and have never had any slippage of any kind period, casting or trolling. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 791
Location: WI | I have two winches and three Nacls and can honestly say I've never had a thumb bar stick or heard of one sticking |
|
| |
|
Posts: 364
Location: Central Wisconsin | I have two NaCls and love both of them. Had a problem with the thumb bar on one but that was because I hit the powerhandle mid cast and the reel tried to engage. I sent it to purefishing and it was fixed and returned within a week!! |
|
| |
|
Location: Latitude 41.3016 Longitude 88.6160 | The reason some of you have problems with the thumb bar is when you push with your thumb you are not pushing straight down, you are pushing in on the thumb bar and that will cause the bar to grove the frame. You must put your thumb on the top of the thumb bar and push straight down.
Also if you try to release the spool thumb bar fighting a fish you will bend the plastic thumb bar arm and that will cause the reel thumb bar not to release, use the drag when fighting a fish. Hope that helps. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1283
| I have 5 NACLs and no issues. The only thing I have had, is if you reel the leader all the way to the tip top at night for instance when you cant see its tougher to press cause the pressure but thats it. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 340
Location: Lake County Illinois | I had a chance to handle the Toro beast at the Milwaukee musky show today. It wasn't on display but if you ask the guys at the Abu Garcia booth,they might bring it out from behind the curtain for you to see.It felt very nice about the size of a 60 but looks like it sits up a bit higher,but not much.It was a high speed reel 6.3;1 I believe, and the didn't seem sure if there was going to be other speeds but hopefully there will be.I wish I could have snapped a picture but im guessing they would have said no. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1283
| Any idea on line pick up? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1901
Location: MN | achotrod - 2/14/2015 10:21 AM
Any idea on line pick up?
He said they were shooting for 34" |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2687
Location: Hayward, WI | cave run legend - 2/14/2015 10:59 AM
34" with 6:3:1 gears? If it takes the same effort as the tranx hg I would rather have the 9" on the tranx.
If it's a happy medium between the two Tranx options, the Abu is what I would prefer.
None of us really know what to expect from this reel yet, but I'm hoping for good things. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1901
Location: MN | We'll see but you're absolutely right, it depends on how they achieve it whether it's worth a hoot or not |
|
| |
|
Posts: 791
Location: WI | I'm assuming we are able to talk about the toro beast now that they had it displayed at the Milwaukee show? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1283
| Anyone get a pic of it? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 791
Location: WI | I should have taken a pic next to a Nacl 60. Really only thing bigger is the gear side. If it is bigger it doesnt feel as such. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2097
| What line pickup is the nacl high speed, 31" or so? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1283
| Thats great news! I had to sell my Tranx do to its size and weight. If this truly is the middle of the road in performance between the HG/PG and is the size of a 60 Im ready to order! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 750
Location: Minneapolis, MN | achotrod - 2/16/2015 10:44 AM
Thats great news! I had to sell my Tranx do to its size and weight. If this truly is the middle of the road in performance between the HG/PG and is the size of a 60 Im ready to order!
I don’t know, doesn't really seem middle of the road to me, 5.4:1 with 34 IPT would be more middle of the road in my opinion.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 2097
| I agree. Probably 300$ or so does not seem worth it for 3 more inches with 6:4:1gears IMO. I would buy a low profile with 34" in 5:4:1 gears in a heart beat. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1901
Location: MN | Sizewise it's really almost unoticeable - only slightly bigger I'd say in length, and it may sit a hair higher, than an NACL. But of course since they aren't even sure what they will settle on it's hard to say if it's done changing and therefore final. I agree that if they can achieve 34 ipt with 5.3-5.4 gear ratio, and in the size they showed me or even a little bigger, then they've got my undivided attention and interest. Anything much less than 33-34" or much greater than 5.4 though and they've lost me. He made such a big deal out how much smaller and lighter it would be than the Tranx and Lexa 400 but forgot the most important part - how will it compare performance-wise. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 32950
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | It's going to be more than 34" on a nearly full spool if the reel we used as a prototype is going to be the production model. I think it will be.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 1150
Location: Minnesota. | pklingen - 2/8/2015 6:03 AM
for the life of me i just can't figure out why anyone would ever want to put more than 100 yds of expensive braid of any kind on a reel for muskie fishing. i've always used mono backing wound on tightly to get me to that depth on the reel and have never had any slippage of any kind period, casting or trolling.
Pat, I've often wondered that very same thing. Why? All you need is 100 yds. of good braid...back it with whatever you feel is fit. The cheaper the better.
You can buy heavy, thick backing to take up space as needed or cheapo mono etc. Use the dbl. Uni for the connection. Saves lots of $$!
|
|
| |
