Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2 3
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> What MN lake would you stock?
 
Message Subject: What MN lake would you stock?
Slow Eddie
Posted 3/4/2014 12:16 PM (#696057 - in reply to #696035)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 50


Location: Duluth
Had the local DNR tell me that Whiteface Reservoir would be a match. Would be butting heads with walleye guys to try and get it stocked though.
Brad P
Posted 3/4/2014 12:23 PM (#696063 - in reply to #696057)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 833


Kabetogama. It would be a drive, but it has some incredible potential for big fish with it's forage base.
Big Burch in Todd County: Ciscoes, Perch, White Suckers, strong forage base.
Big Deer near Effie: Probably has a nascent population due to tributary to Big Fork River, would be low pressure, has Ciscoes.

I'm biased on the last two since I have easy access.


bdog
Posted 3/4/2014 12:42 PM (#696070 - in reply to #696057)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 357


Location: Duluth, MN
Slow Eddie - 3/4/2014 12:16 PM

Had the local DNR tell me that Whiteface Reservoir would be a match. Would be butting heads with walleye guys to try and get it stocked though.


Ive heard the same about Whiteface as well for a few years now. Hopefullly it happens! Be nice to have a lake between Duluth and Vermilion...
Brad P
Posted 3/4/2014 2:02 PM (#696112 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 833


Going to need lobbying $$$ to make that happen. I know old T-Bone is dying to see Koronis get stocked. That lake has Ciscoes too! Would be a fun one for sure.
T-Bone
Posted 3/4/2014 8:31 PM (#696289 - in reply to #696112)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 223


Location: Victoria,MN
Brad P - 3/4/2014 2:02 PM

Going to need lobbying $$$ to make that happen. I know old T-Bone is dying to see Koronis get stocked. That lake has Ciscoes too! Would be a fun one for sure.


I'm not that old Brad lol
Koronis has some decent habitat
Pedro
Posted 3/4/2014 9:20 PM (#696311 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?





Posts: 670


Location: Otsego, MN
Whitefish chain for sure it would be awesome! I've seen 2 of them in there already.
jasond
Posted 3/4/2014 9:22 PM (#696313 - in reply to #696035)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 187


Location: West Metro, MN
I have always thought that Big Marine would be a great muskie lake to add another option in the metro. Tetonka would be great too, the south half of the state is very under represented.
Boots Electric
Posted 3/4/2014 10:31 PM (#696327 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: RE: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 45


Fish Lake and Boulder Lakes north of Duluth would be awesome. Both flow directly into Muskie waters/St Louis River.
Dave Williamson
Posted 3/5/2014 5:30 AM (#696344 - in reply to #696035)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?





Posts: 203


Location: Alexandria, Minnesota
Minnewaska near Glenwood, MN was a stocked lake back in the 70's would be an awesome lake or the Chain of Lakes in Alex, Carlos is loaded with Tulibees....Also would like to see Winnebigosh stocked like Mille Lacs used to be, put 10,000 fingerlings in there for 10 years..
bdog
Posted 3/5/2014 5:35 AM (#696345 - in reply to #696327)
Subject: RE: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 357


Location: Duluth, MN
Boots Electric - 3/4/2014 10:31 PM

Fish Lake and Boulder Lakes north of Duluth would be awesome. Both flow directly into Muskie waters/St Louis River.


I believe Fish and Boulder were stocked a bit back in the 70's. Seems I rememebr my old man getting a couple by accident out of boulder back in the early 80's. Also a few summers ago a guy caught what I am 99% sure was a small 30"ish tiger out of Fish....maybe some of them made it?? I think Fish would be a hard sell at the moment as theyre really working on repairing the crash of the walleye fishery there. Id love to see it though as that would put 4 muskie waters right out my back door!

Edited by bdog 3/5/2014 6:44 AM
LandBigFish
Posted 3/5/2014 7:00 AM (#696347 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 54


Location: Minnesota
Whiteface and boulder would be a nightmare would love to own a prop and lower unit shop near by!! Fish lake would be a awesome addition to the Duluth area. Big Sandy would produce pigs excellent forage and super structure with hard to reach backwaters. That would be a musky maniacs paradise!
Jacko
Posted 3/5/2014 8:45 AM (#696377 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: RE: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 72


Pepin
nocturnalmotors
Posted 3/5/2014 11:49 AM (#696427 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?





Posts: 373


Location: Maine Township, MN
Ottertail.
Nershi
Posted 3/5/2014 1:16 PM (#696450 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Location: MN
I'd love to see Fish Lake by Duluth but good luck with that. The DNR and locals will pound their heads against a wall trying to make that a walleye lake. To say Boulder and Fish flow directly into musky waters is a stretch. There are mutliple dams between them and the St Louis trib where the majority of the muskies live.

IMO Big Sandy would not be a good candidate. Look at how many fish died and escaped during the 2012 flood. There also a lot of escape routes that would reduce the stocked fish population. I'd love to see it stocked but I would be suprised if the DNR did.
jakejusa
Posted 3/5/2014 1:24 PM (#696452 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: RE: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 994


Location: Minnesota: where it's tough to be a sportsfan!
Spread them out in all areas. dreaming= Madison Lake in LeSuer County. The lake is full of shad up to around 5 lbs. Would be a great fertile growth factory of a lake. Southern MN needs two more lakes bad!
MuskyManiac09
Posted 3/5/2014 2:11 PM (#696475 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?





Posts: 183


Location: Grand Forks ND
Might as well stock Lizzie, there are already a few in there.
bdog
Posted 3/5/2014 2:30 PM (#696481 - in reply to #696475)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 357


Location: Duluth, MN
Is there any avenue for us muskie guys to push/persuade/ask for particular lakes to be stocked?
FAT-SKI
Posted 3/5/2014 2:34 PM (#696482 - in reply to #696481)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 1360


Location: Lake "y" cause lake"x" got over fished
Medicine Lake... I swear that lake would do really well for Muskie, Plus its small so the numbers would not have to be super high to get the job done. Plus I can darn near cast to it from my deck

I would have wished the Sauk Chain of lakes if the same question was asked 5 years ago. But they already did that, which is awesome!

Edited by FAT-SKI 3/5/2014 2:35 PM
T-Bone
Posted 3/5/2014 3:35 PM (#696499 - in reply to #696452)
Subject: RE: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 223


Location: Victoria,MN
jakejusa - 3/5/2014 1:24 PM

Spread them out in all areas. dreaming= Madison Lake in LeSuer County. The lake is full of shad up to around 5 lbs. Would be a great fertile growth factory of a lake. Southern MN needs two more lakes bad!

Madison or Washington I think would be good , southern Mn definitely needs more.

dami0101
Posted 3/5/2014 4:04 PM (#696505 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?





Posts: 750


Location: Minneapolis, MN
I'd really like to see something in Anoka County but the forage base probably isn’t that great, no shiners or anything like they have up north to get big, so I don't think you'd get giants. They might actually make pretty decent tiger musky lakes though as they have similar forage bases to Lake Johanna.

I could get behind medicine lake as well.

I would certainly get behind the whitefish chain as it would present an option for a weekend trip that isn't as far way from the metro.

Edited by dami0101 3/5/2014 4:06 PM
Tonka Boy
Posted 3/5/2014 4:27 PM (#696511 - in reply to #696505)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 96


All of them!! Call me selfish but miss the days when I was the only one fishing muskies.

Still my fav but WAY too many people on the ski bandwagon these days...just not enough lakes to get away from the crowds no matter where you go.
bigred2198
Posted 3/5/2014 5:01 PM (#696518 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 397


Francis would be a good lake as well. Like said above we need more lakes in Southern MN more than we do up Nirth
jakejusa
Posted 3/5/2014 5:10 PM (#696520 - in reply to #696057)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 994


Location: Minnesota: where it's tough to be a sportsfan!
"Might as well stock Lizzie, there are already a few in there." That's what was thought about TeTonka they are already there. But the new DNR commissioner pulled the plug on the stocking in another truly political maneuver.
Boots Electric
Posted 3/5/2014 5:18 PM (#696526 - in reply to #696450)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 45


Nershi - 3/5/2014 1:16 PM

I'd love to see Fish Lake by Duluth but good luck with that. The DNR and locals will pound their heads against a wall trying to make that a walleye lake. To say Boulder and Fish flow directly into musky waters is a stretch. There are mutliple dams between them and the St Louis trib where the majority of the muskies live.

IMO Big Sandy would not be a good candidate. Look at how many fish died and escaped during the 2012 flood. There also a lot of escape routes that would reduce the stocked fish population. I'd love to see it stocked but I would be suprised if the DNR did.


Not a stretch at all. Boulder flows directly into Muskie water. Fish flows into the outflow of the Muskie water. The reason many of the lakes already stocked, were chosen, was there assimilation to(if loosely) to the great lakes or bodies of water harboring(if but a remnant) Muskie pop. In terms of Duluth area waters, there aren't many better choices, and as the second largest populated region of the state, arguing for another Muskie lake in the area isn't a stretch. Having ties to waters already containing Muskies would be ones best chance for being chosen imo.

Edited by Boots Electric 3/5/2014 5:21 PM
tolle141
Posted 3/5/2014 9:38 PM (#696605 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?





Posts: 1000


Kabetogama would become the next Vermillion. Diddo for Rainy.

A couple more:
Clearwater by Annandale - big, lots of structure/forage, and would take some pressure off of Sugar
Farm Island - for the days when you get blown off Mille Lacs
Crow River in the west metro - would add a different type of fishing experience and provide opportunities for anglers who don't have boats.
brenth
Posted 3/6/2014 6:57 AM (#696641 - in reply to #696605)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 12


Location: Maple Grove MN
i would like to see the natural musky lakes that no longer have a fishable population of musky be restored.
May
Sugar
Mule
lower Bottle
upper bottle
emma
stocking
little sand
big sand
Belle Taine
Ida
Long
Spider
Steamboat
Wolf
Girl
Woman
northernmn
Posted 3/6/2014 7:33 PM (#696861 - in reply to #696641)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 69


brenth - 3/6/2014 6:57 AM

i would like to see the natural musky lakes that no longer have a fishable population of musky be restored.
May
Sugar
Mule
lower Bottle
upper bottle
emma
stocking
little sand
big sand
Belle Taine
Ida
Long
Spider
Steamboat
Wolf
Girl
Woman


While they are at it they could fix the lakes they diluted the gene pool on with shoepac fish, moose deer (spider only has shoepac) by stocking a few year classes of leech lake strain.
leech lake strain
Posted 3/6/2014 9:32 PM (#696893 - in reply to #695639)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 540


woman lake needs more so does little boy and wabedo. also as a new lake ten mile lake in Hackensack would be awesome, technically it should be already with the river systems and the connecting swamps from leech and boy river chain but it never happened naturally I guess or it did but not enough to sustain healthy enough over the yrs and slowly died out of muskies as some of the lakes in this area i believe maybe have.
bisonthunder
Posted 3/6/2014 9:40 PM (#696894 - in reply to #696035)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 13


Location: Dawson, MN
Only problem with lac qui parle is the best part of the lake is closed during Oct and Nov
Green lake or Minnewaska or Ida get my votes
Sidejack
Posted 3/6/2014 10:11 PM (#696902 - in reply to #695711)
Subject: Re: What MN lake would you stock?




Posts: 1084


Location: Aurora
BFD - 3/3/2014 2:04 PM
The Whitefish Chain, Gull, Pelican, North Long, the Brainerd Lakes area is in dire need of a musky fishery that is close. So many lakes with potential here.

x2
Jump to page : 1 2 3
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)