|
|
Posts: 7049
Location: Northwest Chicago Burbs | Ok, yes I saw pics on fb, just as I see them here from time to time...of people holding muskies, sturgeon, bass, walleyes that are just straight up TINY. That kind of bugs me. We yell and scream about c&r, size limits, fish handling...but then people are taking way undersized fish out of the water, unhooking them, and taking pics.
This bugs me. ALOT.
Am I crazy here? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 173
| Not crazy , maybe ahead of current normal. I'm old and cranky at times and not a fan of seeing pictures of EVERY SINGLE muskie guys catch. Guides I understand ,a kids first , anyone's first or biggest but after catching a few dozen why bother with pics of the 30 inchers ? |
|
| |
|
Location: Eastern Ontario | If it's some ones first or a kids go for it. I've played this game for a long time and fish big fish water so I don't need any more pictures of 40 inch fish. That being said I took some pictures of small fish last year while checking out camera placement for timer shots in a new to me boat I fish alone a lot of the time. I would rather new comers learn fish handling and hone their photography skills on small rather than large fish. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 311
Location: Lake St.Clair | Im the same way if its under 40" I keep em in the the water and unhook without net unless needed.
theres no sense anymore when I first started out I took pics of alot of smaller fish but now i dont. I can understand peoples first fish and yadda yadda |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1000
| those first 20 are exciting, no matter what size. After those, I get your point
That said, I'll take a pic of every Shoepack muskie I get over 30". Those things are gorgeous |
|
| |
|
Posts: 572
Location: Maplewood, MN | I've only personally boated 5 muskies. So far a pic for everyone. Once I hit 10 I probably won't take pics unless its a girthy momma or 45" +. But then again all but one are over 40". I have a buddy who takes a pic of everything and drives me nuts. Nobody cares if you catch 20 30"-37" muskies… I matured very fast with smallies on mille lacs. I was taking pics of all fish over 3.5 lbs and netting them… After being spoiled there, I try to only net and take pics of only 4.5lb+. I hope to be cocky enough someday to only want pics of 50"+ muskies, but then again I'm dreaming. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 20229
Location: oswego, il | As long as the fish are handled properly like any other caught, wgaf? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 84
| After I spent tons of money on boat and tackle I would want a picture to show for. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 140
Location: Northern Illinois | Tiny is in the eye of the beholder. Who are we to judge? Yes you are
crazy. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 897
| I take pics of every single one I catch, even the 18 inchers, and don't feel bad about it at all. Every Muskie is fun to me, and pics get me thru the winter. If anything, the argument should be against taking pics of bigger fish which are more prone to damage from being handled improperly. To each his own, as long as the fish is handled properly, is what I say. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 455
| Well good for the guy who only takes pictures of big ones. Myself included. However the smaller the fish the easier the release so who really cares? If you water released 50" fish and took pictures of 30" you would be doing the fishery more justice than taking pictures of just big ones. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 455
| Keep in mind most photos are take with a phone now days. Long gone are the days of digging a camera out of storage, taking it out of the case, warming it up and screaming instructions to your partner. Oh no the lens cap! The photo is taken by the guy who didn`t catch it with his rite handy phone he is familiar with. The photo is then texted or emailed to the catcher. Takes all of a few seconds. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 84
| I agree the advancement of technology has made it so easy it can all be done in the matter of 5 seconds. I mean really who doesn't have a smartphone these days cameras are a thing of the past. |
|
| |
|
Location: Sawyer County, WI | Small fish photos are OK, but only if they're taken during the Apocolypse. 
Slamr - 6/12/2014 5:02 PM
Ok, yes I saw pics on fb, just as I see them here from time to time...of people holding muskies, sturgeon, bass, walleyes that are just straight up TINY. That kind of bugs me. We yell and scream about c&r, size limits, fish handling...but then people are taking way undersized fish out of the water, unhooking them, and taking pics.
This bugs me. ALOT.
Am I crazy here? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1405
Location: Detroit River | Why should it matter what size fish it is? Taking any size fish out of the water for a picture can still yield the same results. I took this one because it was the very first musky that I ever landed plus I liked the pattern on it. I had been casting with my musky gear all morning & got a little wore out so I switch to casting for smallmouth & caught this little guy.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 16632
Location: The desert | dfkiii - 6/12/2014 8:24 PM
Small fish photos are OK, but only if they're taken during the Apocolypse.
Slamr - 6/12/2014 5:02 PM
Ok, yes I saw pics on fb, just as I see them here from time to time...of people holding muskies, sturgeon, bass, walleyes that are just straight up TINY. That kind of bugs me. We yell and scream about c&r, size limits, fish handling...but then people are taking way undersized fish out of the water, unhooking them, and taking pics.
This bugs me. ALOT.
Am I crazy here?
I laughed. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 483
Location: NE PA | yea, i think its over the top. this isn't like taking a pic of every bluegill you caught. a lot of time and effort goes into each fish caught regardless of size. i have skipped out on pics of fish that were hooked hard in favor of getting it back in the water, but just because a fish isn't huge doesnt mean it cant get it's pic taken. i skipped taking a pic of my personal best for this very reason. If anything, i think a smaller fish is the one you would want to take a pic of if you are purely concerned with the fish's well being. small fish are def more resilient.
the below pics are all tiny fish, but all moments i remember because of the pics.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v643/ljinx23/Fishing/72FECFE5-6785-458C-AC55-BCBDEA64A2AB_zpspsv1uy3n.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v643/ljinx23/null_zps8aba66fb.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v643/ljinx23/null_zps3f652dd5.jpg[/IMG] |
|
| |
|
Posts: 32892
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Tiny fish picture.
Attachments
----------------
 tiny.jpg (50KB - 360 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 167
Location: Tomahawk, WI | You are absolutely crazy on this one. There is nothing wrong with taking a picture of any fish no matter what the size!!! If the fish is handled with care and released it's just fine. I don't know how long you have been at this game, but you should know that the only record we used to have, was the fish on a stringer after we clubbed it over the head. Taking a picture and releasing is soooooo much better. I don't think we should be chastising people for taking a picture and releasing the fish.
Big or small, they are all trophies!!! |
|
| |
|
Location: Eastern Ontario | If you catch many fish don't expect me to sit and look at every 34 inch fish you ever caught. Cameras take better pictures than phones IMHO. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 619
| no reason for small pics if you have been there before. just another chance to tear a gill or even cut yourself. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 437
| sworrall - 6/13/2014 12:35 AM
Tiny fish picture. Uh oh, not only will we have controversy about tiny fish pictures, but now vertical holds! 
#SARC |
|
| |
|
Posts: 84
| ToddM - 6/12/2014 7:13 PM
As long as the fish are handled properly like any other caught, wgaf?
^^^THIS^^^ |
|
| |
|
Posts: 4343
Location: Smith Creek | I do believe you're crazy, but for different reasons entirely.
I consider the source. If you're an 11 year old girl, posting a pic of a little fish is OK. If you're a guide or seasoned angler then I agree, it's kind of dumb, unless the pics are posted in jest.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 2753
Location: Mauston, Wisconsin | Definitely crazy! I saw the same pic's this morning posted by a well known individual. I took it for what it was, interesting.... keep in mind those stupid little fish bit a hook, they deserved to have the moment documented. LOL
Have fun!
Al
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 2687
Location: Hayward, WI | Who cares? Most likely had to handle the fish to unhook it anyway. If you want a picture have a buddy be ready with the camera to snap one quick. The fish is out of the water 2 seconds longer. Small fish usually take right off anyway. If I'm alone and the fish has to sit in the net and wait for me to get a camera out and setup (still only takes seconds while the fish is resting), I'll let the smaller fish go without a picture.
Most of the time though, what is it going to hurt?
I thought winter was over? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 325
Location: Otsego, MN | Practice a quick photo and safe release with the little ones so that when the big girls are ready for a photo there is no mishandling...
I see nothing wrong with a picture of a smaller fish as long as the water temps aren't extreme, the fish isn't overly exhausted and the fish is well taken care of. Sometimes the memories of the small fish live for ever...
I personally take a picture of all small fish while in the net or over the side of the boat and only measure or bring a fish into the boat if its for league or over 40" but each individual can decide if that magic number is larger or smaller. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7049
Location: Northwest Chicago Burbs | Please allow me to retort (while acknowledging I am probably crazy in this way and others): so often we as muskie anglers take the care and treatment of captured muskies to a a nearly fanatical place. We advocate for water releases, raising money for stocking, raising size limits to allow for more bigger fish, appropriate holds, not fishing when the water is above a certain temperature...but then when we are on the water, if we catch it, we should photograph it. Now this portion of my argument is going to sound a bit peta-ish, but it's the truth: hooking fish is bad, yanking hooks out of their faces is bad, and holding fish out of the water where they can't breath is also bad.
I fully understand the "first fish, unusual fish, fish with wife, fish with mom, fish on a new body of water, fish with kids" pics, I really do. I also understand the feeling that we spend so much time, so much money to pursue these fish so therefore we can reward ourselves with a pic.
BUT, the more we stress fish, the higher the chances for delayed mortality. AND, if we're truly committed to more and bigger fish, shouldnt we be doing everything we can to minimize delayed mortality on the fish that will hopefully become those more and bigger fish? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7049
Location: Northwest Chicago Burbs | Jeff78 - 6/13/2014 9:37 AM
It looked to me like you were still trying to cut down the apocalypse fish guy.
Who cares if people take pics of tiny fish???
I hardly take pics of any of my fish any more.
NOT actually thinking of the apocalypse fish guy at all here.
And I did ask if I was crazy, invited the wrath of the masses.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 146
Location: Alsip, IL | Half the reason I fish is to get a good picture of a pretty fish. Some of the smaller ones have the best color patterns. As long as anglers use the proper equipment and a net big enough to allow the fish to oxygenate I'm fine with it. I know probably the first 100 I landed I took a pic of every one. 20 inches to 48. I'm all for CPR. |
|
| |
![[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v643/ljinx23/Fishing/72FECFE5-6785-458C-AC55-BCBDEA64A2AB_zpspsv1uy3n.jpg[/IMG]](http://smg.photobucket.com/user/ljinx23/media/Fishing/72FECFE5-6785-458C-AC55-BCBDEA64A2AB_zpspsv1uy3n.jpg.html){kind=link}
![[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v643/ljinx23/null_zps8aba66fb.jpg[/IMG]](http://smg.photobucket.com/user/ljinx23/media/null_zps8aba66fb.jpg.html){kind=link}
![[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v643/ljinx23/null_zps3f652dd5.jpg[/IMG]](http://smg.photobucket.com/user/ljinx23/media/null_zps3f652dd5.jpg.html){kind=link}
