|
|
| Just read this on another board....
"Just heard an "unofficial report" of a new Canadian record being caught. Anyone have any news?" |
|
| |
|
| I heard 65 pounds and caught trolling. No other details yet. Still waiting! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 198
| Saw a pic of a 59 1/2 x 29 1/2. Heard from the Larry but dont know if kept or released . Maybe same fish? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 198
| I meant 57 1/2 x 29 1/2 |
|
| |
|
Posts: 267
| I believe an announcement will be made re: this fish a few days before the Chicago Musky Show... |
|
| |
|
| Over the past few years, they are getting much looser with information out east. In the past these fish went under the radar. Always fun to see the pics. |
|
| |
|
|
I was told this fish was harvested, not released. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 109
Location: Wisconsin River | has anybody seen this posted anywhere else |
|
| |
|
Location: Hayward WI | On MuskyHunter, but same chatter, no confirm |
|
| |
|
Posts: 5874
| Down Low - 11/29/2012 9:18 AM
I was told this fish was harvested, not released.
Your point is.....what? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1360
Location: Lake "y" cause lake"x" got over fished | If indeed it is an official record the fish must have been harvested. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 8781
| Crap, now what are we going to argue about all winter?? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 357
Location: Duluth, MN | esoxaddict - 11/29/2012 3:11 PM
Crap, now what are we going to argue about all winter??
Lol! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 415
| esoxaddict - 11/29/2012 3:11 PM
Crap, now what are we going to argue about all winter??
I'm sure we can find something!! |
|
| |
|
Location: Sawyer County, WI |
We could debate the timing of the migrating glut of boats from St. Clair to St. Lawrence...
esoxaddict - 11/29/2012 3:11 PM
Crap, now what are we going to argue about all winter?? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1360
Location: Lake "y" cause lake"x" got over fished | esoxaddict - 11/29/2012 3:11 PM
Crap, now what are we going to argue about all winter??
---
Answer.... The next comical guest post |
|
| |
|
| Apparently is not as big as stated, typical guy that's never seen a true 50 lbs that thinks its a world record. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1291
Location: Hayward, Wisconsin | From what I'm hearing, talk here involves two different fish. Time will tell I guess. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 177
| Wait a minute maybe someone should hop on a jet and go and confirm this before it gets in freezer and shrinks lol |
|
| |
|
| There was a 57 3/4 x 25 3/4 caught several weeks ago by a guest on Cpt Dave Curtis boat , a 54 x huge , by Ace Brunner and another 54 1/2 x 29 1/2 ? on a fellow from Windsors boat , The rumour of the new record started a few days ago , still haven't seen any pic's , maybe they are waiting till the season is closed before they share, so someone won't catch one a 1/4 in bigger LOL |
|
| |
|
Posts: 285
Location: NE Wisconsin | Northernlights
Love it, Love it. Love it.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 906
Location: Canada | I've seen the pics of the 54" x 28.5". He's a friend of mine, fished with him and also work with him.
Edited by CU301DSV 11/29/2012 9:08 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| CU301DSV - 11/29/2012 9:06 PM
I've seen the pics of the 54" x 28.5". He's a friend of mine, fished with him and also work with him.
the fish they are talking about is not that size,nobody have tell a single word about this one....... |
|
| |
|
| So what are the supposed dimensions of this one? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 415
| Anybody have any real info yet? Seems like a lot of hints and assumptions but nothing factual. If it is real then why the secrecy? In the era we live in today pictures and the real story of a fish like this gets out within hours, even minutes sometimes. The more this drags on with no actual info the more skeptical I become. |
|
| |
|
| I think a few fish of thise size are taken each year out east and released. It is a different culture and catches tend to stay on the down low. BR |
|
| |
|
| It's naive to believe that every big fish makes it, or should make it, to the internet. Ben's right - the muskie culture is entirely different in eastern Canada then the American muskie culture. |
|
| |
|
Location: Sawyer County, WI | Did Ben say "eastern Canada" or "out east" ?
To think that Canadiens don't report large fish but Americans do is equally naive.
Guest - 11/30/2012 11:04 AM
It's naive to believe that every big fish makes it, or should make it, to the internet. Ben's right - the muskie culture is entirely different in eastern Canada then the American muskie culture. |
|
| |
|
| I see how it could be interpreted that way. Clearly not every big fish will make it to the boards/internet. I take issue with the fact that people *expect* it to be made to the boards. Probably shouldn't involve countries in the discussion, because at the core is the expectation that if someone catches a big fish it should make it to the internet and when one doesn't people get their undies in a bundle because they can't see a picture.
Personally, I'd love to see a photo of a 65lber. Who doesn't? But if the angler chooses to not post it, I'm OK with that and won't think anything of it. It all adds to the mystique... maybe they really do get that big! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 415
| The only reason I "expect" it to be on the internet is because of the people on here teasing about it and talking about this fish, and because of the person who started this thread. Never did I think so many people would get bent out of shape about me asking where any real details were, I guess I should have expected it on here, my bad. And also, I have a cousin who fishes the St. Lawrence religiously and never posts about anything they catch so I have an idea of the "culture" out east. All I'm saying is it is really odd (and pointless) to leak tiny bits of info about a potential record fish, put it on various sites, then not actually give any real info. I also completely agree and like that people don't post every big fish they catch. I personally won't post any myself and respect others right to do the same. Calm down guys. |
|
| |
