Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Replica vs. skin mount?
 
Message Subject: Replica vs. skin mount?
BMuskyX
Posted 9/16/2012 11:53 AM (#585001)
Subject: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 275


What is the going prices on replicas vs. skin mounts.  I'm 100% CPR but I was just curious and got into a conversation with a friend over this topic.

Thanks,

Jaimy

esox911
Posted 9/16/2012 12:31 PM (#585004 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 556


In myu area about 30-40% more for the replica---BUT-- Isn't it worth it--not only in the releasing of the fish but that replica will last longer than us !
horsehunter
Posted 9/16/2012 12:55 PM (#585007 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Location: Eastern Ontario
For me it's the photo holding the fish and if possible a nice release shot , skin mount = dead fish.......replica = plastic fish I can order whatever I want and if I wanted pink and baby blue I could have that too.
BMuskyX
Posted 9/16/2012 1:01 PM (#585010 - in reply to #585004)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 275


30-40% more than what? I haven't had a fish mounted in 21 years and I have no idea what they charge now.

Jaimy
ToddM
Posted 9/16/2012 1:49 PM (#585025 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?





Posts: 20230


Location: oswego, il
Skin mount all the way. Before you attack me, I still release the fish but I do take its skin first. Anold timer told me it grows back.

Edited by ToddM 9/16/2012 1:51 PM
sworrall
Posted 9/16/2012 2:32 PM (#585030 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?





Posts: 32895


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
I agree with Todd, skin 'em and release, especially this time of year after they have lost their teeth. For pricing from your taxidermist, I'd call.
2labradors
Posted 9/16/2012 2:45 PM (#585032 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?





Posts: 125


Location: Barnesville MN
I had a 53" fish die on me last year, to have it mounted it was 800.00 for one side showing or 1800.00 for a pedestal mount so you can see both sides.
Pepper
Posted 9/16/2012 6:11 PM (#585057 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 1516


How do you get them to hold still for the skin removal?
greenstealth
Posted 9/16/2012 6:42 PM (#585058 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 142


Nyquil treated bucktails
Tilky
Posted 9/16/2012 7:15 PM (#585064 - in reply to #585057)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?


Grab'm by the Tail
fishcrazed
Posted 9/16/2012 7:37 PM (#585067 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 171


Location: indiana
hold em vertical for for longer than you can hold your breath and they slide right out
BMuskyX
Posted 9/16/2012 8:21 PM (#585076 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 275


I will never do either, pictures are enough for me. Just curious how much mounts have gone up.

Jaimy
muskymania
Posted 9/16/2012 10:12 PM (#585102 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 208


Location: musky waters , WI
Got a 52.5 replica from last fall and price was right at $14 an inch. This was through fittante from antigo ,wi. Lax was close to that in pricing as well.
hunter991
Posted 9/17/2012 7:10 AM (#585166 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 139


A few years ago i paid only $12 an inch for a replica. Replica's are the way to go, sure they may be more expensive but the fish lives and so does your mount vs a skin mount.
AndyM
Posted 9/17/2012 11:24 AM (#585216 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?


Pricey but only certain taxidermists can do a replica and a skin mount of the same fish and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference - you pay for what you get.
Anonymous
Posted 9/17/2012 12:28 PM (#585230 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?


More than likely the first 50" I catch will get the club. It will depend on the moment. Most of the lakes I fish would probably never produce a 50" anyways and if they did, it would not be growing much bigger than that. Point being, if the fish is at the end of it's life cycle anyways, why not harvest it. Better than keeping a 40" fish in my opinion. Not at all saying I believe all 50's should be kept by any means.

Myself, who does not have a single fish or animal on my wall now, I want a skin mount of the first 50" I get. Especially if the fish were to have some deep, healed over scars or something neat that gives the fish character. Although some replicas do look really good, I just don't think you can exactly 'replicate' a fish. And if I were to actually harvest one, I would vow to never get another skin mount (of a musky anyway).

I will remain anonymous to deflect the bashing.


Edited by Anonymous 9/17/2012 12:31 PM
JKahler
Posted 9/17/2012 1:17 PM (#585242 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 1290


Location: WI
I always said I would thump a 50" if I got one...then I released it without even a picture. Won a replica last year for a 52.5" from Artistic Anglers. Haven't got it yet, but should be ready any day now!
guest
Posted 9/17/2012 4:24 PM (#585280 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?


Anon, isn't a skin mount also another replica?? Maybe a little less of one than a true replica since the skin/scales and fins/tail are used (though backed by plastic reinforcement). However, the skin loses color post-mortem and is stretched over a mold, then has to be re-painted like a true replica any way. The taxidermist must have a good eye and artistic ability to get your 'skin mount' even close to the real thing. Case in point #1: I have a largemouth skin mount that looks very much like a smallmouth bass! The thing was painted so poorly that the mount doesn't look at all like the real thing, even though the real skin and fins/tail were used.

I'm pro replica and know I won't change your mind re. clubbing your first big fish, but aren't 'skin mounts' and 'replicas' both really replicas in the end?

guest
thrax_johnson
Posted 9/17/2012 5:36 PM (#585301 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?





Posts: 313


Location: Bemidji, Lake Vermilion
There are unfortunately many people like Anon who have or intend to club their first one. Seen it happen firsthand in my area. Surprising number of people are coming to the "blessed land of 50 inchers" ie MN and clubbing one. Guess its a personal preference but logistically, fish of that size from anywhere should not be killed. If its really at the end of its life cycle its going to look like heck anyways. Healthy fish, decent girth etc are NOT near the end of their lifecycle. Way way too many identifiable 50+ inch fish have been caught over and over again throughout the years by locals in my area. Passing the enjoyment on to the next person to catch the big girl is part of the fun!
Slow Rollin
Posted 9/17/2012 6:46 PM (#585321 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 619


Got a 54.5 half on the wall, its skin.. I had to keep it cause it swallowed my cowbell.... it was so deep i could hardly get the lure out when i got home... still bummed about killing it. Anyway that one ran me $550 - that was 4 yrs ago too. Cowbell is death sentence to alot of fish and has changed alot of lakes. All my back hooks are now barbless for the most part.
reelman
Posted 9/17/2012 10:21 PM (#585400 - in reply to #585216)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 1270


AndyM - 9/17/2012 11:24 AM

Pricey but only certain taxidermists can do a replica and a skin mount of the same fish and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference - you pay for what you get.


With all do respect I've yet to see any replica musky that I couldn't tell was a replica from across the room. The replica guys ae good, no doubt, but they just can't get the mold to look like the real thing, I think it has to do with the scales.

On a side note is a replica painter really a taxidermist? They're artists for sure but if all they do is replicas do they even need a taxidermy liscense?
Ja Rule
Posted 9/18/2012 9:41 AM (#585464 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 415


reelman - 9/17/2012 10:21 PM

AndyM - 9/17/2012 11:24 AM

Pricey but only certain taxidermists can do a replica and a skin mount of the same fish and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference - you pay for what you get.


With all do respect I've yet to see any replica musky that I couldn't tell was a replica from across the room. The replica guys ae good, no doubt, but they just can't get the mold to look like the real thing, I think it has to do with the scales.

On a side note is a replica painter really a taxidermist? They're artists for sure but if all they do is replicas do they even need a taxidermy liscense?


I would also say the majority of real skin mounts I see of all species look like garbage. Very few fish mounts I have seen look all that much like the real fish they came from. Just look at deer mounts. No replicas there, and some look downright funny, and others look like the real thing. In the end its mostly art whether its real or not.

I have three replicas from three different guys, and IMO the Fittante is simply the best one out there. Well worth a little longer waiting period.
Sorgy
Posted 9/18/2012 10:05 AM (#585471 - in reply to #585464)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 304


Location: Lino Lakes, MN
I am sure that there are taxidermist who will "stuff" a fish for half of what a reproduction cost.
However a world class fish like many of these 55" fish should get world class taxidermiy work and I believe that would cost well over the cost of a replica by Lax or Fittitani- sorry for the spelling

My two cents

Steve
Anonymous II
Posted 9/18/2012 12:21 PM (#585495 - in reply to #585230)
Subject: RE: Replica vs. skin mount?


Anonymous - 9/17/2012 12:28 PM More than likely the first 50" I catch will get the club. I will remain anonymous to deflect the bashing.


I can understand why you would want to remain anonymous and it is certainly your right to keep a legal fish. However, if you do decide to keep one I would recommend you just keep it quiet and not mislead anyone into thinking that you released it like this guy did.

http://www.lake-link.com/Wisconsin-Fishing-Reports/report.cfm/26069...

Pretty amazing because Alexander estimates the fish to be 44-45lbs, when he knows it full well it only weighed 35lbs at Smokey’s on Bay when he brought there. It's very excusable to have a fish die, but when a well-known guide like this deliberately misleads people showing off release shots of a dead fish on this other web-site to shamelessly promote his business, it really gets my goat.

It's one thing to have an individual stretch of fish here or there, who really cares anyway. But when a guide or business purposefully misleads people in an attempt to part them with hard-earned dollars, well, the public should be made aware.

In my opinion, this is not the first time this guy has done this and many muskie fishermen are being seduced with his false advertising.
Guest
Posted 9/18/2012 12:25 PM (#585498 - in reply to #585064)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?


Tilky - 9/16/2012 7:15 PM

Grab'm by the Tail


Tilky knows the above is true but may not want to get in the middle of it.
Kleck
Posted 2/27/2013 12:24 PM (#621362 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 68


Dumb question as I know nothing about taxidermy so take it easy on me here... How do you tell the difference between a newer skin mount and replica? I impulsed bought a mount from a consignment/estate sale sort of store for dirt cheap and they did not know or have any info about it or who did it. Except that they thought is was a 45" tiger but is actually a 50 x 27 barred (f'n pig!).

The head, gills and fins are fake. Does anyone even use a real head or head skin anymore, or fins???

Seems like some real thick clear on it which makes it harder for me to tell on the body. It's not glossy smooth and has quite a few tiny pinpoints spots where it appears to have collected some dust while the clear was drying. There is a distinct seem at the top and bottom, and a few areas around the fins where it gets thicker and has some minor separating/detaching from what I think is the form. The skin detail is pretty good, especially between the pelvic fins. No seem running between them, more of a diamond/triangle pattern where it meets up with the belly seem and where the fins were attached. At the top it kind of looks like skin may have been attached but I'm really not sure. It was mounted to drift wood with some long screws going into the reverse side. From the holes I can see where the screw separated the paint and clear from the body, and then underneath that is a thicker yellowish/off-white sort of layer before the actual form (skin?).

Just curious. I'd like to repaint it or see if it can be lightened up since the bars are real dark, almost black, and I'd like to see if it can be made to look like a more traditional barred musky. Before I take it to a taxidermist I'd like to call around and get some quotes, and to make sure they would even want to do it since I know many would rather just start over with a replica since I'm assuming it's a lot more prep and hassle to repaint real skin.

I can post some details pics of certain areas later tonight if it helps.

Thanks

Edited by Kleck 2/27/2013 12:26 PM
jchiggins
Posted 2/27/2013 9:48 PM (#621628 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?




Posts: 1760


Location: new richmond, wi. & isle, mn
You have to be a artist to paint graphite or the real thing. A buddy had a fish done "repo" by artistic anglers. I will say a beautiful job. They guaranteed it for life. While in the process of moving he broke off a fin. They fixed it up as good as new no questions asked .
Wood_Duck
Posted 2/28/2013 7:39 AM (#621689 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?





Posts: 555


Location: Tennessee
I'll say with the high end replicas I've saw vs skin mounts, the replicas win hands down! the quality made replicas look like the fish just slid out of the water. There are some fantastic skin mounts as well but I've saw way too many boogered up looking ones.
Waldo not logged in
Posted 2/28/2013 7:53 AM (#621693 - in reply to #621628)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?


jchiggins - 2/27/2013 9:48 PM
You have to be a artist to paint graphite or the real thing.


Exactly. Lot of guys in this thread don't understand how taxidermy works. If you're unhappy with a replica or skin mount, you're mostly unhappy with the painting skills of the taxidermist.

Guy I fish with learned taxidermy from Neal Long. IMO no one paints better muskies than Neal did.
Pointerpride102
Posted 2/28/2013 9:44 AM (#621778 - in reply to #585001)
Subject: Re: Replica vs. skin mount?





Posts: 16632


Location: The desert
If you're unhappy with any mount, you didn't do your homework and look at a gallery of the taxidermist's work. The old adage "you get what you pay for" also applies to taxidermy.
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)