Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Big St. Germain Needs Your Help |
Message Subject: Big St. Germain Needs Your Help | |||
Peter Stoltman |
| ||
Posts: 218 | There has been a proposal to essentially privatize the boat launch at Big St. Germain Lake and charge a "reasonable" daily use fee ($7-$10). This would take the boat launch out of the hands of the DNR and has many hidden side effects. Lakes without public launches typically do not get stocked by the DNR for one. This proposal was initiated by members of the Big St. Germain Lake Council. The current boat launch is maintained (and upgraded a couple years back) by the DNR and paid for with your tax dollars, license fees etc. My opinion is that charging a daily use fee would be a HUGE mistake. The lakes committee has a meeting coming up and I would encourage anyone with an interest in this topic to attend or at the very least send a note expressing your questions or concerns. Here's a copy of the meeting announcement letter I received from the Chamber of Commerce. As we stated during our Chamber after 5 social event we would let you know when the next Lakes Committee meeting was to be held. Town Chairman Walt Camp has told us that it will be Tuesday, May 8th at 7PM at the St. Germain Community Center. The topic came up as a result of conversation about charging a launch fee at the Big St. Germain boat ramp. If you have an opinion on this fee per launch proposal this meeting may be worth attending. It is the belief of the St. Germain Chamber that this fee proposal would be detrimental to tourism in the St. Germain area. St. Germain Area Chamber of Commerce, Inc. PO Box 155 St. Germain, WI 54558 (715) 477-2205 / 800-727-7203 / Fax (715) 542-3423 www.st-germain.com / email: [email protected] | ||
CiscoKid |
| ||
Posts: 1906 Location: Oconto Falls, WI | Pete was is the reasoning behind this? Why make it private, and what do they need the daily fee money for? | ||
Public Waters |
| ||
What do they think they'll be able to use the money for? The law says they can't charge more than $7 without prior DNR approval and the money must be used to maintain the launch itself. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/caer/cfa/accessabandonment/AllowableFees.html If the launch is already being adequately maintained by the DNR, there's no need for the town to collect money to maintain it. If that's the case this sounds a lot more like an attempt to reduce public use of the lake - good for the priviledged few who live on the lake, bad for everyone else in town running a business. | |||
sworrall |
| ||
Posts: 32882 Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | That is exactly what it looks like. | ||
jonnysled |
| ||
Posts: 13688 Location: minocqua, wi. | it's a fear-based money-grab playing scare-tactics to people who are "used to paying where they are from". i'm in the valley monday and tuesday and hope to be back in-time for the meeting. this is what could happen if we continue to "ask" to pay more fees. they will use it to charge us ... in spades. | ||
Peter Stoltman |
| ||
Posts: 218 | Public Waters - 5/3/2012 9:09 AM What do they think they'll be able to use the money for? The law says they can't charge more than $7 without prior DNR approval and the money must be used to maintain the launch itself. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/caer/cfa/accessabandonment/AllowableFees.html If the launch is already being adequately maintained by the DNR, there's no need for the town to collect money to maintain it. If that's the case this sounds a lot more like an attempt to reduce public use of the lake - good for the priviledged few who live on the lake, bad for everyone else in town running a business. I agree completely with a slight note of correction. It is NOT the town that would collect for this or for that matter even want it to happen. This is the brainchild of a few members of the Big St. Germain Lake District. At the previous meeting I attended the dollar figure was not set but it was stated that there is a mechanism in place that would allow such a group to do this and charge a "reasonable fee" and the $7-10 numbers were thrown around. | ||
Guest |
| ||
Or more accurately what happens when we get a little too conservative. | |||
Public Waters |
| ||
This is the brainchild of a few members of the Big St. Germain Lake District. Is the launch in good shape? If so, it sure does sound like the brainchild of a few people who want to exclude everybody else from "their" lake. Who owns the launch site, or has the agreement with the DNR for maintaining it? I assume it's the lake district or else they wouldn't be exploring this option? Lake management districts are one of the groups specifically listed in NR 1.91 (11) allowed to charge "reasonable" fees if they're the responsible group. http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code/admin_code/nr/1/91 | |||
esox69 |
| ||
Posts: 802 | If this happens on Big St., what'll keep this from becoming the new accepted way of access on the other lakes? Imagine all the lakes you hit with fees, nice huh? Especially puts the hurt on us lake jumpers who hit 3-6 lakes over our 16 hour fishing days... Steve | ||
cincinnati |
| ||
Posts: 1120 Location: West Chester, OH | Something not clear to me: Is the BSG Lake Council a private lake association? (vs a public entity) If so, how are they able to assume ownership of a publicly owned facility? | ||
WI Skis |
| ||
Posts: 547 Location: Oshkosh | I agree with the comment of if this passes, what stops more lakes from doing this and the effect it would have on the lake jumppers. What I feel would be a good idea is to charge a 5 od 10 dollar yearly county wide launch fee that is used strictly for launches. Think of how much money that would raise a year for Onida and Vilas county even at $5! Yet it is not a large fee that it will prevent anyone from going on their vacation, or force them to leave their boat or jet ski at home. Just my 2 cents. Peter Edited by WI Skis 5/3/2012 11:08 AM | ||
Jon Jantzen |
| ||
Big Saint is only a few miles from my house, and I seldom fish it; however, if this fee passes, it most likely won't be long before other lakes follow suit. That is my real concern especially for people that like to hit several lakes in a day as previously mentioned. | |||
scmuskies |
| ||
Those interested in contacting the lake association can reach them by following this link: http://www4.uwsp.edu/cnr/uwexlakes/lakelist/orgdata.asp?OID=69 | |||
ulbian |
| ||
Posts: 1168 | jonnysled - 5/3/2012 10:33 AM it's a fear-based money-grab playing scare-tactics to people who are "used to paying where they are from". i'm in the valley monday and tuesday and hope to be back in-time for the meeting. this is what could happen if we continue to "ask" to pay more fees. they will use it to charge us ... in spades. Why not just offer a stamp you can buy with your fishing license that gives you access to the ramp? Problem solved! | ||
JKahler |
| ||
Posts: 1286 Location: WI | Why not just buy a fishing license that has money added into it to go towards those things. Oh wait... | ||
jonnysled |
| ||
Posts: 13688 Location: minocqua, wi. | ulbian - 5/3/2012 10:15 PM jonnysled - 5/3/2012 10:33 AM it's a fear-based money-grab playing scare-tactics to people who are "used to paying where they are from". i'm in the valley monday and tuesday and hope to be back in-time for the meeting. this is what could happen if we continue to "ask" to pay more fees. they will use it to charge us ... in spades. Why not just offer a stamp you can buy with your fishing license that gives you access to the ramp? Problem solved! ;) well played Bob! ... lol | ||
CiscoKid |
| ||
Posts: 1906 Location: Oconto Falls, WI | jonnysled - 5/4/2012 6:20 AM ulbian - 5/3/2012 10:15 PM jonnysled - 5/3/2012 10:33 AM it's a fear-based money-grab playing scare-tactics to people who are "used to paying where they are from". i'm in the valley monday and tuesday and hope to be back in-time for the meeting. this is what could happen if we continue to "ask" to pay more fees. they will use it to charge us ... in spades. Why not just offer a stamp you can buy with your fishing license that gives you access to the ramp? Problem solved! ;) well played Bob! ... lol While that was a good funny, it would solve the problem and I wouldn't have an issue doing it. | ||
jackson |
| ||
Posts: 582 | This is nothing more than local people living on this lake to stop people from going on this lake. its a power grab. | ||
sworrall |
| ||
Posts: 32882 Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Perhaps we should set up a system where everyone places the vast % of our income into a fund the legislators and private interests can squabble over, and we get access to hunting and fishing, roads, city services, all our taxes paid, health care and the level of service increases on all fronts. Worked for the Communists and Socialists. | ||
jonnysled |
| ||
Posts: 13688 Location: minocqua, wi. | jackson - 5/4/2012 6:59 AM This is nothing more than local people living on this lake to stop people from going on this lake. its a power grab. yup ... suckering liberal minded people who "can justify it vs. coffee or a tank of gas" ... stp oil treatment on a pig i believe was the best analogy. hey, minnesota people ... do you enjoy paying your vehicle value tax each year? i thought you pay the tax to the state when you buy the darn thing? it astonishes me how clear the power grab of taxation is, yet it's applauded by bleeding hearts. unreal | ||
Peter Stoltman |
| ||
Posts: 218 | Yes, the point is we ALREADY PAY for these launch ramps. It's sort of like going to the grocery store and buying your goods then having the grocery store charge you some additional fee to maintain the store. This IS a power grab, nothing more nothing less. | ||
CiscoKid |
| ||
Posts: 1906 Location: Oconto Falls, WI | Mind you I am not saying what is done is right (completely against). What I am saying is if I want to use the lake I will do what I it takes to use it. I sure hope this doesn't go too far, and as others mentioned set a precedence for the future. | ||
jonnysled |
| ||
Posts: 13688 Location: minocqua, wi. | don't trip while you backpeddle travis :0) | ||
Johnnie |
| ||
Posts: 285 Location: NE Wisconsin | It has been a few years, but as I remember from being a Conservation Congress delegate on a Public Access Comm with the DNR, a taxable entity such as a county, town, city, or "lake district", not a lake association, can charge up to the daily entrance rate of a state park, at boat landing they control and the landing will still be consider a PUBLIC LANDING in the eyes of the DNR. Like it or not, ask anyone who fishes in the southern 2/3 of the state and they will tell you free landings are getting rare. | ||
jonnysled |
| ||
Posts: 13688 Location: minocqua, wi. | Johnnie - 5/4/2012 8:45 AM Like it or not, ask anyone who fishes in the southern 2/3 of the state and they will tell you free landings are getting rare. HOT ... HOT ... HOT ... HOT | ||
Public Waters |
| ||
So who actually owns the access on Big St Germain? It sounds like a private site being maintained by public money for public use. Shouldn't that private entity have the right to make their own decisions about it? Shouldn't they be able to pick whether to let the DNR maintain it for the public, or charge a fee to maintain it privately themselves, or even (gasp!) shutting it down completely? If it's private, would you rather that the government decides what they can and cannot do with it? Or should we decide? Or maybe Sled should decide for them? If it's a private-public partnership (as it sounds) and they're considering going entirely private, then Pete is on the right course by working with the Chamber of Commerce to try and apply pressure to them to make a different decision and keep it free and open. I assume that will involve showing them the benefits of keeping it free. Which benefits are likely to matter to THEM? | |||
jonnysled |
| ||
Posts: 13688 Location: minocqua, wi. | there is a local action group that is putting together an appropriate response. it's involvment includes Pete along with the owner of a major resort among others and represents this group specifically. i'm confident they will articulate the position well. i think the attendence will show a lot of support and keep it from getting out of control. at least i hope so ... don't like the precedent if it comes to that. Edited by jonnysled 5/4/2012 10:32 AM | ||
Sam Ubl |
| ||
Location: SE Wisconsin | This isn't a fun topic. The "free" launch on Big Saint should be left as it is.. | ||
scmuskies |
| ||
Public Waters - 5/4/2012 10:18 AM So who actually owns the access on Big St Germain? The State of WI owns the launch, which is why a private group shouldn't be able to impose a fee on a launch they don't own. | |||
Gander Mt Guide |
| ||
Posts: 2515 Location: Waukesha & Land O Lakes, WI | In a time where fuel is 4.00 a gallon, bag limits are dropping and property values are falling like meteors, placing a tax on public lake use is idiotic. Its like saying, "hey we know that 1/2 the amount of people are visiting than use to be, so to express our gratitude to those who do show up.....pay us 7.00 please" I wonder what Rob Manthei thinks of this. | ||
Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
Copyright © 2024 OutdoorsFIRST Media |