Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> Fishing Reports and Destinations -> Not a Muskie, but?
 
Message Subject: Not a Muskie, but?
muskie24/7
Posted 11/5/2010 8:25 PM (#465735)
Subject: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 909


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I caught this beautiful Walleye today on the river I guide on in PA! The Youghiogheny River! She measured 35" and 16 lbs! The only reason I killed this fish was because I truely beleived that it was a state record! (17.4lbs) Hell, I thought it was a world record ! (LOL) I would have bet the ranch that it was over 20+ lbs. I took it to a certified scale and it was 16.1 lbs. Still a trophy anywhere in the world! I beleive this is the same Hawg that followed my lure 2 yrs. ago! She ate a Walleye Phantom on a rock pile in 8 ft. of water! When I was admiring her in the net I thought to myself, This must be what it feels like to put a good 50+" Muskie in the net! The Muskies didn't show today but it was still a "Great Day"!

BTW..Youghiogheny is pronounced Yock-O-Gay-Nee


Brian


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(HUGE YOUGHIOGHENY WALLEYE 35 in 16lbs 001 [640x480] [640x480].jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(HUGE YOUGHIOGHENY WALLEYE 35X16 001 [640x480].jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments HUGE YOUGHIOGHENY WALLEYE 35 in 16lbs 001 [640x480] [640x480].jpg (87KB - 206 downloads)
Attachments HUGE YOUGHIOGHENY WALLEYE 35X16 001 [640x480].jpg (120KB - 1029 downloads)
TJ DeVoe
Posted 11/5/2010 8:37 PM (#465737 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 2323


Location: Stevens Point, WI
Wow, that's a big fish, and old!
4reukmuskies
Posted 11/5/2010 8:52 PM (#465738 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 422


Congrats! Monster walleye!
muskihntr
Posted 11/5/2010 8:54 PM (#465739 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 2037


Location: lansing, il
Wholly Crap Brian!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHOAAAAAAAAAAA!
Jsondag
Posted 11/5/2010 9:08 PM (#465745 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 692


Location: Pelican Rapids, MN
I'd take that slob water donkey any day of the week - That is awesome!!! 35" walleye is like a 58" musky in my opinion.
Hunter4
Posted 11/5/2010 9:11 PM (#465747 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 720


Jerry,

Any day of the week and twice on Sunday. What hog.
JKahler
Posted 11/5/2010 9:25 PM (#465748 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 1295


Location: WI
Very nice!
firstsixfeet
Posted 11/5/2010 10:14 PM (#465751 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 2361


Love the aged head on that thing. Wonder how many years it roamed the waters.
wers4455
Posted 11/5/2010 11:05 PM (#465754 - in reply to #465751)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 415


Location: madison wisconsin
Very nice fish. Cool that you've seen walleye follow, would love to see that myself
esoxaddict
Posted 11/5/2010 11:19 PM (#465755 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 8828


Wow!
lehighmuskies
Posted 11/6/2010 4:46 AM (#465761 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 348


just curious im a pa guy where abouts in pa is this river?Out west pittsburg area? looks like the lehigh a little bit that i fish.Awsome fish for sure biggest walleye ive seen in pa ever
pepsiboy
Posted 11/6/2010 8:05 AM (#465762 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?


CONGRATS!
sworrall
Posted 11/6/2010 8:18 AM (#465763 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 32926


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Wow.
Tackle Industries
Posted 11/6/2010 8:34 AM (#465766 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 4053


Location: Land of the Musky
PIGGGGGY!!!!
DR in VA
Posted 11/6/2010 10:31 AM (#465774 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 210


Location: VA
Amazing fish....Think of how many years of great spawning that baby had! Millions of eggs over the years. Keeping that fish at it's age won't hurt the resource one bit. Honor that baby at the dinner table and think of her often.

What a grand fish! Congratulations!!!

DR
bigbite
Posted 11/6/2010 11:01 AM (#465776 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: RE: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 1348


Location: Pewaukee, WI
Way to go Brian! That's a monster in anyone's book.
Cast
Posted 11/6/2010 11:44 AM (#465779 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: RE: Not a Muskie, but?



Don't apologize for keeping the fish. Its spawning days probably ended long ago.
I don't fish for walleyes, but have been on the Yough for other things. I don't want to hit your place, but could you say what stretch of the river you caught this monster on?
spoonva
Posted 11/6/2010 5:19 PM (#465801 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 29


Congrats on such an awesome Walleye.

As others have stated, her spawning years has past so no need to feel bad for keeping her.
Cheza
Posted 11/6/2010 6:09 PM (#465805 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: RE: Not a Muskie, but?


Great fish - you must have been using Trilene!:)
jerryb
Posted 11/6/2010 8:13 PM (#465822 - in reply to #465805)
Subject: RE: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 688


Location: Northern IL
What a great walleye, and no need to be concerned about taking such a brute. As already stated her productive days are behind her. Put her on the wall and be proud that you were the lucky one to catch it.

The taxidermist should be able to determine it's age.

Edited by jerryb 11/6/2010 8:20 PM
fish4life
Posted 11/6/2010 10:33 PM (#465835 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 238


Wow! What a Tank!
Trolling Thunder
Posted 11/7/2010 8:03 AM (#465845 - in reply to #465835)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 390


Location: Ohio
Wow, what a pig!! Congrats Brian!
Medford Fisher
Posted 11/7/2010 8:52 AM (#465848 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 1060


Location: Medford, WI
Brian, like Jerry stated above...I would say catching this walleye is more similar to catching a musky that is 55"+. I don't have any experience with fish that big, but I've caught a few over 50 and I'm pretty sure I'd rather catch that walleye than a musky that just makes the 50" mark. Congratulations...amazing fish!

-Jake Bucki
Chasin50
Posted 11/7/2010 5:36 PM (#465862 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 378


Location: Michigan
Definately a fish of a lifetime... What a hog! Would have to agree, more like 55"+ muskie...
TET62
Posted 11/7/2010 6:32 PM (#465868 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 109


Location: Spencer, Wisconsin
HOLY BALLS... nice Walleye...
jakejusa
Posted 11/8/2010 8:51 AM (#465911 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: RE: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 994


Location: Minnesota: where it's tough to be a sportsfan!
Eye of a lifetime for sure! You get past 30-32" you just don't get to see fish like that very often Congrats!
THA4
Posted 11/8/2010 9:49 PM (#466008 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 468


Location: Not where I wanna be!
awesome catch!!!! Congrats
muskie24/7
Posted 11/9/2010 7:10 AM (#466027 - in reply to #466008)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 909


Hey Guys, Thanks for all the nice replies! I am going to put her on the wall so she can be admired for years. That fish deserves it! If I knew she wasn't going to make the books she would still be roaming the river today! I will put a good scale in my boat so this never happens again. The scale will also be large enough that a Muskie can be weighed on it too! I wouldn't be able to sleep if this were a "potential record muskie" and I kept it for personal gain and it didn't qualify! It may sound like I'm being alittle hard on myself but this is a very small river that seems to be declining a little more each year! (Thanks to the million canoers from ALL the local outfitters) I would like to see my Kids enoy it for a long time as well! Once again thanks to all and Keep throwin' em back! "It works"!

Brian
suicknut
Posted 11/9/2010 5:57 PM (#466100 - in reply to #466027)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?




Posts: 97


Location: Chaska MN.
All I can say is WOW that fish is HUGE
JakeStCroixSkis
Posted 11/19/2010 10:23 AM (#467364 - in reply to #465735)
Subject: Re: Not a Muskie, but?





Posts: 1425


Location: St. Lawrence River
wow what a HUGE walleye.
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)