Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
| Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
| Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Fish Size |
| Message Subject: Fish Size | |||
| Fisher |
| ||
Posts: 427 Location: Roseau | What do you think the length of this fish is?? Thanks Attachments ---------------- northern7ko.jpg (54KB - 120 downloads) | ||
| Lockjaw |
| ||
Posts: 147 Location: WI - Land of small muskies and big jawbones | 38" | ||
| Fisher |
| ||
Posts: 427 Location: Roseau | I hope to get a few responses, it was claimed to be 50.5", I said 41" at the most, no way 50.5" though!! | ||
| thedude |
| ||
Posts: 469 Location: Downers Grove, IL | It looks like a 36" fatty from Lac Seul. | ||
| ToddM |
| ||
| Looks like you are holding it out away from your body a bit. Nice pike for sure but not over 40". | |||
| Mikes Extreme |
| ||
Posts: 2691 Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin | I would guess low 40's. 41 sounds like a good guess. | ||
| Fisher |
| ||
Posts: 427 Location: Roseau | It was from another website, it isnt a fish I caught. They are just claiming a huge number for a pic that is so obvious that it isnt 50.5" Just get sick of large numbers being claimed for alot of fish out there that arent even close!! | ||
| B420 |
| ||
Posts: 382 | Having caught pike over 40" that thing is 38" max. skinny little kid pushing it way out from his body, 50.5", yeah and the Popes jewish! Attachments ---------------- LOW 003.jpg (66KB - 113 downloads) | ||
| Beaver |
| ||
Posts: 4266 | You're looking at a picture of me holding a 43 incher that I caught on Cass.....and I'm 6'2" 230# You make the call. Edited by Beaver 5/25/2006 4:17 PM Attachments ---------------- CASStor fish 43x22.JPG (71KB - 106 downloads) | ||
| EsoxHawk |
| ||
Posts: 89 | Beav C'mon, you're closer to 240lbs.! In the last five years I've caught 15 pike over 40 and unless Luis Spray caught that fish it's (maybe) - 38! However, still a beauty | ||
| esoxaddict |
| ||
Posts: 8849 | 36" - 38" The tail doesn't hang and the belly isn't drooping in the middle like when you hold a long fish | ||
| bnelson |
| ||
| i'd give it 38-40" and I think that is a girl..not a guy holding it? | |||
| ToddM |
| ||
Posts: 20270 Location: oswego, il | Here is a 44 I measured a few years ago. The girth makes her stubby looking but it's 44. Attachments ---------------- 03Tm44pike.JPG (29KB - 109 downloads) | ||
| Shep |
| ||
Posts: 5874 | Here's a 37.5 and a 38 that Eric caught one day while fishing with JoMusky and me. He was 11 then. Attachments ---------------- Eric37a.jpg (142KB - 113 downloads) EricJoe38a.jpg (123KB - 114 downloads) | ||
| Pikiespawn |
| ||
Posts: 921 Location: Apollo, PA | 40" Tops, when you see a person hold a fish away from their body, towards the camera - "that's a baddddd sign". Still a nice pike in my book, but tops 40". PS | ||
| DJS |
| ||
| Closer to 35" than 40" no doubt about it! | |||
| Derrys |
| ||
| If that fish is 50.5 inches, I'll put Mustard on my hat and eat it! Here's a 39.5 from Lac Seul a couple years ago. Attachments ---------------- Lac Seul Pike.JPG (86KB - 111 downloads) | |||
| Bytor |
| ||
Location: The Yahara Chain | Beaver - 5/25/2006 4:16 PM You're looking at a picture of me holding a 43 incher that I caught on Cass.....and I'm 6'2" 230# You make the call. Beaver are you Paul Bunyan.....6'2" on your knee. I agree with Brad that is a girl.....the fish is about 39". Todd why don't you have Beaver show you how to hold a nice Pike. | ||
| JohnMD |
| ||
Posts: 1769 Location: Algonquin, ILL | I would like to think that it was a typo and he intended to say 40.5, It is a nice fish though | ||
| BALDY |
| ||
Posts: 2378 | JohnMD - 5/26/2006 9:04 AM I would like to think that it was a typo and he intended to say 40.5, It is a nice fish though agreed. typo at 40.5. It was also listed with an 18" girth. As fat as that thing is, if it were 50.5" it would certainly have more than an 18" girth | ||
| Obfuscate Musky |
| ||
Posts: 654 Location: MPLS, MN | Right about 40" | ||
| Got Esox? |
| ||
Posts: 350 Location: WESTERN WI | 36"-38" no larger. Nice fish, but the fish lost 12" of length... somehow, someway, it has shrunk. Edited by Got Esox? 5/26/2006 10:28 PM | ||
| gatoRRR |
| ||
![]() Posts: 12 | this is more or less a 50"... 125 cm in the metric sistem Attachments ---------------- Tony125cm_4kgb.jpg (47KB - 135 downloads) | ||
| esox50 |
| ||
Posts: 2024 | Good Lord! It's interesting to see how the markings of North American pike vary from those in Europe. Can I ask if that was caught in the Baltic Sea? | ||
| Derrys |
| ||
| I've caught two fish in Pelican Lake in MN that had those same markings. Mine were both under two pounds. I no longer have the photos, but they looked identical to this fish above. | |||
| esoxlady |
| ||
Posts: 223 Location: minneapolis | WOW!! That pike is huge ! The tail is perfect and the markings are really nice. Great fish ! | ||
| MuskyStalker |
| ||
Posts: 317 | Baltic Pike have those markins. Awesome! | ||
| firstsixfeet |
| ||
Posts: 2361 | Derrys - 5/27/2006 5:51 AM I've caught two fish in Pelican Lake in MN that had those same markings. Mine were both under two pounds. I no longer have the photos, but they looked identical to this fish above. Chain pickerel possibly? | ||
| gatoRRR |
| ||
![]() Posts: 12 | she is an italian girl... very healty and still swimming. fabio | ||
| Derrys |
| ||
| Firstsixfeet, I'm not exactly sure. I sent Rob Kimm the photos and I can't remember what he said. They were very similar to the fish in this previous post. Probably were Pickerel. | |||
| Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] |
| Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |


Copyright © 2025 OutdoorsFIRST Media |
