Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> 60" 72LB?
 
Message Subject: 60" 72LB?
lifeisfun
Posted 8/13/2016 5:39 AM (#827148)
Subject: 60" 72LB?





Location: Ontario
60" 72LB ?
I know I couldn't hold 72LB that way

http://oxfordleader.com/?p=74694
muskie-don58
Posted 8/13/2016 7:33 AM (#827151 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 213


Location: FIB land
Terrific Muskie 4 sure
lifeisfun
Posted 8/13/2016 9:29 AM (#827156 - in reply to #827151)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Location: Ontario
muskie-don58 - 8/13/2016 8:33 AM

Terrific Muskie 4 sure


Beautiful clean fish but why the need for the exaggerating silly story?

Not many anglers can claim they’ve landed a fish in the world-record range, but Tom and Tim Berger can.
The father-son team hooked a muskellunge (muskie or musky, for short) that was 60 inches long July 26 while fishing in Ontario, Canada’s North Channel.
“We’ve seen and caught a lot of big fish up there, but nothing like this,” said Tim, a resident of Orion Township and 1991 Lake Orion High School graduate.
“This was a monster,” said Tom, an Oxford resident. “When you see one that big in real life, it’s almost hard to believe. Just the mass. Unbelievable.”
This muskie’s girth measured 31 inches.
“That’s my grandson’s waist (size),” Tom said. “This fish was so thick all the way back to the tail. We couldn’t bend the fish to get it in the net completely.”
The Bergers didn’t have a proper scale aboard their boat to weigh the beast, but based on the measurements they took, they estimated it weighed about 72 pounds.
“This definitely dwarfed all the other ones that we’ve caught up there,” Tim said.
“It was a dream come true,” Tom said. “We’ve been fishing for so many years, trying to hook a big one . . . I can’t even tell you how many hours we have (spent) on the water.”
To put this great fish’s size in perspective, it’s important to know that, according to the International Game Fish Association, the all-tackle world record for muskie is 67½ pounds and 60¼ inches long with a girth of 33½ inches.
It was landed by Cal Johnson on Lac Court Oreilles, a large freshwater lake near Hayward, Wisconsin. The famed catch occurred on July 24, 1949.
The Bergers, along with Orion resident Ethan Beckman, were trolling in 17-foot deep water along the edge of a weedbed near a 120-foot drop-off when they encountered this giant muskie.
They had four lines out, one of which contained a jointed wooden lure handcrafted by Ziggies Muskie Lures in Marine City.
The lure’s pattern is called “$9 Bass” and that’s the one that piqued this hungry, underwater predator’s appetite.
“It looks just like a smallmouth bass,” Tom said. “It’s a great bait.”
When the fish hit, they definitely knew it.
(The reel) just started singing,” Tom said. “It peeled out so much line at first, it was crazy.”
Beckman grabbed the rod and commenced the fight. But after about 10 minutes, he was worn out, so Tim tagged in, while Tom drove the boat. “It was a battle,” Tim said.
“The rod was just bent right over – looked like a C,” Tom noted.
They were using a 60-pound test leader attached to 30-pound test main line.
“We fish purposely for big fish with big equipment,” Tom said. “You don’t catch big fish on little, teeny hooks and line. That just doesn’t happen with a muskie.”
Several times, Tim managed to get the muskie close to the boat, only to have it take off on another run. “To get it in the boat was a chore,” Tom said.
They tried netting it, but that was easier said than done.
“I have a large muskie net and it wouldn’t even fit,” said Tim, who noted it was only able to cover about three-quarters of the fish.
They were finally able to get it alongside the boat and unhook it while it was still in the water. “It wasn’t hooked deep,” Tim said.
The muskie was too heavy to lift with the net. “It would have broke the net,” Tim said.
So, using one hand to hold the outside of the gill plate and the other to support the belly, Tim hoisted it out of the water and into the boat. It was so massive and he was so fatigued that Tim stumbled a bit.
“That’s not like me,” he said. “I was worn out. I was definitely tired from the fight.”
The whole battle lasted at least 40 minutes. “He’s stronger than me,” said Tom, referring to his son. “I couldn’t have done it.”
Once the fish was in the boat, they worked quickly and efficiently to measure and photograph it for posterity. “I started snapping pictures pretty fast,” Tom said. “We were all hyped up. It was a beautiful specimen.”
Instead of keeping the fish and turning it into a trophy to hang above the fireplace, the Bergers opted to let this mighty muskie live to fight another day.
“We have always let big fish go,” Tom explained. “That’s our habit.”
“I didn’t see a need to kill the fish,” Tim said. “The fish was in very good shape, very healthy.”
So as to not put too much strain on it, the muskie was only out of the water for about two or three minutes before being released.
Tom described the feeling of watching it swim off as “rewarding.”
The Bergers are no strangers to muskie fishing. The father and son have been angling in this area of Ontario for decades and staying at the Bay Villa Lodge in Whitefish Falls. Tom’s been going there for 54 years, while Tim’s been making the trip for more than 30 years. Closer to home, they fish Lake St. Clair.
“I’ve caught a lot of muskies. We’ve caught several in the 50-inch range,” Tim said. “I’ve never seen or had one this large up there. It was the fish of a lifetime for us.”
“We caught a 54-inch (muskie) on Lake St. Clair a while back and we thought we would never exceed that,” Tom noted.
For Tom, the best part of the whole experience was being able to share it with his son.
“That’s what fishing’s all about,” he said. “That’s priceless.”






Edited by lifeisfun 8/13/2016 9:55 AM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(hmmm.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments hmmm.jpg (245KB - 756 downloads)
Bondy
Posted 8/13/2016 10:40 AM (#827161 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 720


Giant. Those size fish are certainly in the system. I've seen two in my life that were 60-62" cruising on the surface. One day 'Clair' is gonna bite. They may have just got her though.... Or her sister.
wild
Posted 8/13/2016 11:23 AM (#827164 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: RE: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 101


Nothin for nothing, however, an over 40 min fight with a 60" fish..... and it was released alive... that's along time for a big girl to be pullin...(most I've ever battled is maybe 5-8 min, 40-50" ski's)...and they were armed with Muskie gear per say, and picked clean from the water...... not that it didn't happen but...looks like a 48"-50" class fish... IMO

And agree, I've boated a 55" and a 52" in the last 2 years and I couldn't hold em out like that....my 55" went from below my knee to my shoulders held on an angle...I believe Gerry posted it on here a while back...If it's 5ft and 70lb... it's one hell of a fish, and he's an Olympic weight lifter.
Pointerpride102
Posted 8/13/2016 11:27 AM (#827165 - in reply to #827161)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 16632


Location: The desert
40 minute battle, after 10 minutes they had to switch off? Were they fighting the fish in free spool?

Obviously, a blatant exaggeration in every aspect of this story.
169sportsman
Posted 8/13/2016 11:56 AM (#827167 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 99


Come on they were fishing with big fish gear. 30 pound test and a 60 pound leader. Lol
mnmusky
Posted 8/13/2016 12:01 PM (#827169 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




nice fish. a lot of stress build up in the last third of her.
detroithardcore
Posted 8/13/2016 2:21 PM (#827171 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 299


Wow! Now that's a story! So funny! 40 minutes and a brutal fight! Man....I've landed Tarpon on Fly in the 150# range and it only took maybe 20 minutes. That is surely a super fish! That Muskie must have saltwater in its blood. Funniest story of 2016! I'm all for positive vibes and not at all jealous so before you attack me just know I'm trying hard to believe the story! I wish it was true!!
Jeremy
Posted 8/13/2016 4:14 PM (#827175 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 1150


Location: Minnesota.
That's a monster of a fish. Can't say much about all the info. given as I've not ever come close...HUGE fish!!

You gotta love fishing forums tho!
Fish4muskie
Posted 8/13/2016 4:19 PM (#827176 - in reply to #827167)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 112


Location: Illinois
Exactly. Load of BS. Nice fish but no way
NPike
Posted 8/13/2016 5:40 PM (#827179 - in reply to #827176)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 612


I'm stuck between 36" to 45", not complaining, so I can't say. It's one heck of a fish.
Randy
Posted 8/13/2016 7:16 PM (#827184 - in reply to #827179)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 243


Location: South Central Wisconsin
Nice fish for sure! Figure his hand is 6-7 inches. It will easily be a 24 inch girth fish. I can even see a bit more. The guy doesn't seem to be very tall.
Landry
Posted 8/13/2016 9:50 PM (#827196 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 1023


I have a buddy that catches an incidental 48" Muskie every other year. when I took him Muskie fishing he held his 36" and called it a 40+.
They all look really big when u first start catching them, even for big fish anglers like the guys above. Lol.

Edited by Landry 8/13/2016 10:47 PM
ToddM
Posted 8/14/2016 7:26 AM (#827207 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 20277


Location: oswego, il
Looks bigger than 60 to me.
Junkman
Posted 8/14/2016 8:07 AM (#827212 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 1220


So, let me restate the rules: if you post a photo with no specifics, you will receive two days and 46 posts of the most heart-felt congratulatory and admiring applause you ever saw. If you post length, you will be a liar. If you add girth, you'll also be mentally incompetent. If you add the name of the lake, you will be burned at the stake.

As one of those guys who drives those "really obvious" musky rigs, I can tell you that I seldom get away from a busy ramp ( or a gas station ) without being told of the "60" or bigger fish their brother-in-law got just last week. Now, a calmer and older guy, I simply reply, "Wow, that's a really nice fish!"
lifeisfun
Posted 8/14/2016 8:15 AM (#827213 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Location: Ontario
Junkman, you forgot to incorporate in your first paragraph what happens if you provide details on how long you had to battle the fish, and how many people had to take turns to get her in the bag
Sidejack
Posted 8/14/2016 8:22 AM (#827214 - in reply to #827212)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 1082


Location: Aurora
First of all, i had no idea De Niro was a muskie hunter fishing under the guise of "Tom".
Also, he looks healthy but who knew he'd put on so much weight?
sworrall
Posted 8/14/2016 12:35 PM (#827230 - in reply to #827214)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 32954


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
How it's done...
WOLFFMAN
Posted 8/14/2016 3:06 PM (#827235 - in reply to #827184)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 51


agree on girth
WOLFFMAN
Posted 8/14/2016 3:09 PM (#827236 - in reply to #827235)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 51


24 inches at most
tomcat
Posted 8/14/2016 3:17 PM (#827238 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 743


I know this a long shot..and yes, i did the standard google search, but does anyone know how to get a hold of Berger? Tim or Tom? i think i may have released this fish 5 or 6 years ago, but i need a photo of the other side of the fish to confirm.
lifeisfun
Posted 8/14/2016 3:25 PM (#827239 - in reply to #827238)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Location: Ontario
tomcat - 8/14/2016 4:17 PM

I know this a long shot..and yes, i did the standard google search, but does anyone know how to get a hold of Berger? Tim or Tom? i think i may have released this fish 5 or 6 years ago, but i need a photo of the other side of the fish to confirm.


I would think if you contact the guy (C.J.Carnacchio Editor)
who added the article he should be able to do something about it.

Jim Sherman    Publisher
C.J.Carnacchio Editor
Eric Lewis     Ad Manager
[email protected]
Address: 666 S. Lapeer Road, Oxford, Mi 48371
Phone: 248-628-4801
Fax: 248-628-9750

Edited by lifeisfun 8/14/2016 3:30 PM
esox911
Posted 8/14/2016 10:12 PM (#827262 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 556


No doubt a BIG FISH---just look at the head and Girth. I have no Idea by looking at the pics if it was 55-57- or 60"...but it is big. I am not a huge guy but I just picked up my DOG ( A lab ) who is about 65 lbs...And I can hold her out away from my body using my arms similar to the picture with that fish. I would have no problem holding her there for a couple minutes for pictures-== so I think some might be wrong in stating that he could not hold a fish weighing 72# ( an estimate mind you ) out like that. It is a VERY LARGE FISH and Congratulations to the anglers whatever the true size........
Lake Of The Woods
Posted 8/15/2016 1:11 AM (#827263 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: RE: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 63


Muskie sizing chart.



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Muskie 2007_Weight_Estimation_chart.pdf (149KB - 1214 downloads)
Lake Of The Woods
Posted 8/15/2016 1:16 AM (#827264 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: RE: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 63


Ontario Fish Records



Attachments
----------------
Attachments RecordFishMay2013.pdf (251KB - 621 downloads)
Lake Of The Woods
Posted 8/15/2016 1:24 AM (#827265 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: RE: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 63


Ontario Waters Trophy size Muskie



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Ontario Waters Trophy Sized Muskie.pdf (132KB - 1353 downloads)
dfkiii
Posted 8/15/2016 7:22 AM (#827270 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Location: Sawyer County, WI
It's still 1/4 inch shorter than Cal Johnson's fish.
gregk9
Posted 8/15/2016 10:38 AM (#827283 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: Re: 60" 72LB?





Posts: 797


Location: North Central IL USA
Yep, 60", internet ruler.
greyghost
Posted 8/15/2016 5:55 PM (#827338 - in reply to #827148)
Subject: RE: 60" 72LB?




Posts: 36


Location: Honor, MI
I call BS to the whole story. From the size, to the "fight" to the test of line and leader. Take a look at the recent Michigan state record 58"/58#''er, and tell me which is bigger.
Article says there were 3 men in the boat and 4 lines out. Ontario fishing regulations clearly state 1 rod per person is allowed which means that this fish was caught illegally. I'm glad I'm not the only person to catch this fact. Having written Larry Ramsell,
he confirms others have made him aware of it as well. I only hope someone notifies the
Canadian Ministry. I'd love to hear the word "busted." I'm sure there are some out there who would say I'm jealous. Well, I suppose you'd think i was jealous of the guy who tried to register a 12# largemouth as a new Michigan Record several years ago, a fish bigger than my PB. Turns out the Michigan DNR had scale samples sent to a lab that determined this "record" was a Florida strain bass. Busted.
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)