|
|
Posts: 32954
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Larry Ramsell sent me this image on his way to Canada. Supposed to have washed up on shore. Big fish...
Attachments
----------------
 index.png (89KB - 1302 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 670
Location: mercer wi | Wow!! That's all I know about it |
|
| |
|
Posts: 16632
Location: The desert | I believe that's the musky that wrecked the walleye fishery there. According to my sources around here. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1150
Location: Minnesota. | Man, that thing is HUGE!! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 130
Location: Duluth, MN | Maybe it's just me, but that fish looks like it is a LONG ways in front of that guy. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 558
| Had a buddy send that to me and he was told it was supposed to be 73 inches. Who knows? Big fish, that's forsure! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 133
| Hate to be a doubter.... But where does the rest of his right leg go under neath the gill plate??? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 8863
| This muskie is no more. It has ceased to be. It's expired and gone to meet its maker. This is a late muskie. It's a stiff. Bereft of life, it rests in peace. If you hadn't held it up for a picture, it would be pushing up the daisies. It's rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. This is an ex-muskie. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 558
| Thuawk - 8/4/2016 9:05 PM
Hate to be a doubter.... But where does the rest of his right leg go under neath the gill plate???
Good eye and good point! Lol |
|
| |
|
Posts: 576
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL & Phillips, WI | I love Monty Python! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1000
| saw this 2 days ago. thought it looked weird, but thought about it more and no way would I have toughed that either. should've bumped/measured it. no way they didn't. We need to find the source
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 20277
Location: oswego, il | It said 73" in the email I seen today.
EA, the parrot skit is one of my favorites. And your wrong, it's just restin.
Edited by ToddM 8/4/2016 9:49 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 1760
Location: new richmond, wi. & isle, mn | I'm pretty sure that's vermilion. ;-). |
|
| |
|
Posts: 299
| I would certainly hope someone didn't lie or photoshop to get a rise or attention. These days it's so hard to believe anything posted on the Internet. I would hope or wish it was true but I'm having a hard time believing. Either way if not photoshopped or someone exaggerated the length it's still a big fish! I would like to hear more about this entire story. 73" is beyond crazy....that Tarpon length... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 13
| Talked to a co-worker yesterday that has a place on Mille Lacs. He mentioned that he heard of a big fish that washed up on the north end that was roughly measured by stepping off a little over 6 shoe lengths (mentioned roughly 65"). I've been around a few really big fish in my day - the fish in that photo was a VERY special creature. If any of us had that thing (alive)slide up behind your bait at boat side - we'd be a stuttering shaking mess for a couple of minutes. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 444
Location: Duluth, MN | OK so what did they do with the fish? Did they call the DNR so this can be looked at? Is it sitting in someones freezer? We need a full story:} |
|
| |
|
Posts: 133
| Can someone please explain how they see this picture? Maybe Im wrong but the man's leg that his elbow is leaning on. How come you can't see the rest of it under the gill plate? I can't get over that fact. Maybe he is an amputee and if thats the case I'm sorry |
|
| |
|
Posts: 151
Location: Chippewa Falls, WI | agree with the other skeptics...he appears to be missing his lower right leg and how do you grab a gill plate with your right hand that way without torqueing the heck out of your wrist? I hate to be one of the guys questioning something that I have no knowledge or first hand experience with but in this day and age who can blame us! I'm betting staged pic of a big fish making it appear epic... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 576
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL & Phillips, WI | Something weird going on below the fin on the right side of the fish. If you zoom in, it looks like a straight line of different color background. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 133
| Sorry boys 65's still don't exist!! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 13
| The guy appears to have taken the photo on a slight hill or stairs down to the dock. Fish is on the uphill side and his left leg is on the bottom of the hill. This isn't rocket science or camera trickery - it's spatial separation. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1425
Location: St. Lawrence River | I wonder how that guy cooked it up? Wrap some in aluminum foil with some butter, pepper, little lemon, throw it on the grill. A little poor mans lobster. MMMMMM MM. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 133
| Left leg is not the question I asked. His right leg is |
|
| |
|
Posts: 135
| Photoshop. Shins don't bend. 73"? 65"? 6 shoe lengths?
Whatever. You're being trolled...
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 2384
Location: On the X that marks the mucky spot | If it was real the fish would have been made available or at a taxidermist by now. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 770
| I agree if it were true it would be EVERUWHERE outdoor news, field and stream, ect. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 994
| it's photo-shopped (poorly). There are 3 layers to that pic if you open in it in a photo-editing program. Still a big fish though |
|
| |
|
Posts: 20277
Location: oswego, il | Maybe someone from Hayward can put some calipers on this fish photo and tell us how long it is. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| That is funny LOL I hope we are thinking of the same guy. That guy is a > wait i will just shake my head. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1638
Location: Minnesota | Somthing smells fishy
I vote photo shop |
|
| |
