Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Anyone one else see this
 
Message Subject: Anyone one else see this
bbradley
Posted 10/15/2015 10:35 AM (#788650)
Subject: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 114


I know its not musky related, but couldn't believe this.


http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2015/10/14/wis-judge-allows-chippewa-...
TonyT65
Posted 10/15/2015 10:46 AM (#788651 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: RE: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 52


Hey lots of poachers take their deer that way ..... way to go cheeze land judge !!

Edited by TonyT65 10/15/2015 11:00 AM
North of 8
Posted 10/15/2015 11:05 AM (#788656 - in reply to #788651)
Subject: RE: Anyone one else see this




First, Crabb is a federal judge, not state. Second, the reason this was allowed after being turned down before was because the WI DNR when first setting regulations for wolf hunting, allowed night hunting for wolves. This was reversed eventually but the DNR under our clueless secretary, Stepp, set the precedent by allowing it. Judge Crabb in an earlier case a few years ago denied night hunting for the tribes, but the DNR's okaying it for wolf hunting opened the door and the judge changed her ruling accordingly.

Some time ago a retired DNR employee told me this would happen. He said the agency today is not being run by scientists and natural resource professionals but by politicians. And not very competent politicians at that.
sworrall
Posted 10/15/2015 11:06 AM (#788657 - in reply to #788651)
Subject: RE: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 32892


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
'A federal judge has ruled Chippewa tribes can hunt deer at night beginning next month across most of northern Wisconsin'

'U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb issued an order Tuesday'

Same judge who ruled on many of the treaty rights ceded territory issues. Federal.
KenK
Posted 10/15/2015 11:33 AM (#788664 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 574


Location: Elk Grove Village, IL & Phillips, WI
This will only strain relations up north! Not a good thing.
Flambeauski
Posted 10/15/2015 11:39 AM (#788667 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 4343


Location: Smith Creek
A little less sleep for the wardens.
Headlock
Posted 10/15/2015 1:00 PM (#788684 - in reply to #788667)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 116


Flambeauski - 10/15/2015 11:39 AM

A little less sleep for the wardens.


I have not seen a warden in the "northwoods" in 20 years.
Musky952
Posted 10/15/2015 1:27 PM (#788690 - in reply to #788684)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 400


Location: Metro
Headlock - 10/15/2015 1:00 PM

Flambeauski - 10/15/2015 11:39 AM

A little less sleep for the wardens.


I have not seen a warden in the "northwoods" in 20 years.


So you're saying they are just none existent? lol.
sworrall
Posted 10/15/2015 1:35 PM (#788692 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 32892


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
They are too few in numbers, under payed and overworked, and unloved. I should'a been a warden, at least then I would have a gun and look far more threatening.
Musky952
Posted 10/15/2015 1:57 PM (#788696 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 400


Location: Metro
I understand what he was trying to say but if there are less Wardens it is going to be even LESS sleep for those few individuals. I'm being too analytical, got the musky jitters at work right now.
Headlock
Posted 10/15/2015 1:58 PM (#788697 - in reply to #788692)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 116


sworrall - 10/15/2015 1:35 PM

They are too few in numbers, under payed and overworked, and unloved. I should'a been a warden, at least then I would have a gun and look far more threatening.


That is fact.
North of 8
Posted 10/15/2015 2:18 PM (#788703 - in reply to #788697)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Well, the warden here in Oneida county seems like a good guy and is hardworking. In the first 45 plus years I have had to have a fishing license, I was checked a grand total of one time on the water. So far this year I have been checked twice, once on the ice and the second time musky fishing, plus I ran into him at the boat landing on a third occasion.

geo
Posted 10/15/2015 7:17 PM (#788742 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 32


Location: Centeral Wisco
If they want night hunting then they should have to close a casino
ToddM
Posted 10/15/2015 7:27 PM (#788746 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 20230


Location: oswego, il
Pardon some of my ignorance here. Expanding to ceded territory there is private property correct? If so what permissions are granted? Will there be limits on the amount of deer taken? Did not see this in the article.
Jeff78
Posted 10/15/2015 7:30 PM (#788747 - in reply to #788746)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 1660


Location: central Wisconsin
I am wondering if it is shotgun only. I cannot believe rifles would be allowed.
jonnysled
Posted 10/15/2015 7:32 PM (#788749 - in reply to #788747)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 13688


Location: minocqua, wi.
won't be as easy for them to go nocturnal during the gun season this way ...
Jeff78
Posted 10/15/2015 7:40 PM (#788755 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 1660


Location: central Wisconsin
Good article on JS online
jaultman
Posted 10/16/2015 7:29 AM (#788791 - in reply to #788746)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 1828


ToddM - 10/15/2015 7:27 PM

Pardon some of my ignorance here. Expanding to ceded territory there is private property correct? If so what permissions are granted? Will there be limits on the amount of deer taken? Did not see this in the article.

They talked about this on NPR for a little while yesterday and made it sound like it will be a heavily-regulated thing. Hunters must first take a safety course AND pass a test on the rifle range, to name a couple specifics.
KenK
Posted 10/16/2015 7:51 AM (#788796 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 574


Location: Elk Grove Village, IL & Phillips, WI
Not much time to take the safety course if this is opening up on November 1st.
dfkiii
Posted 10/16/2015 8:37 AM (#788802 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Location: Sawyer County, WI
So they pull out their high powered spotlight and shine the deer, then blast away. I guess the judge has never heard of the concept of fair chase. Pretty disturbing, but like the treaties there's nothing you can do about it.
BornToFish1
Posted 10/16/2015 12:01 PM (#788822 - in reply to #788802)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 51


I see this matter somewhat differently than the previous post, as I believe there is something that can be done about it. I think about issues such as spearing and night-time hunting for deer every time that I drive by a casino. I just drive right by without stopping. I know many other outdoorsmen that do the same thing.
sworrall
Posted 10/16/2015 12:05 PM (#788825 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 32892


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Which will be completely ineffective, unfortunately.
jonnysled
Posted 10/16/2015 12:10 PM (#788827 - in reply to #788825)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 13688


Location: minocqua, wi.
last winter i drove around my neighborhood at night with a spotlight for about 5 hours helping to look for a neighbors dog that was lost. with a rifle in hand i could have fed the whole town for a month. the don't move off of beds with spotlights and don't even get startled. granted this herd is a bit on the tame side but i would imagine by this experience that night hunting will be pretty productive.

maybe we could get the same judge (in chicago, right?) to open feral cat and feral human hunting on the streets of Chicago at night?
Flambeauski
Posted 10/16/2015 12:26 PM (#788831 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 4343


Location: Smith Creek
The way it's written it doesn't look like road hunting is an option. Guess we'll see.
Lumpy
Posted 10/16/2015 12:38 PM (#788834 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 102


Road hunting is definitely legal for this hunt. Read the FAQ, answers a lot of questions people have. I can't believe they can put out a corn pile, use thermal imaging and infared for locating them, then flip on a 1 million candle power spotlight, put their high caliber rifle on the edge of the window from the driver's seat of their truck, and shoot them. Yup, just like their ancestors did it. AND, the justification is for sustenance. Just shows you that non-native americans are superior hunters compared to native americans, as we get it done during daylight and we can't shoot from our vehicle...we actually have to walk out there. Disgusting.

http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/hunt/documents/tribalFAQ.pdf
North of 8
Posted 10/16/2015 1:05 PM (#788837 - in reply to #788834)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




While I don't like the ruling and regret that the incompetence of the WI DNR management made it possible, I don't think non-native hunters can feel all that superior. It isn't native hunters that pay big bucks to outfitters in northern WI for bear hunts where the outfitter hauls gummy bears and other sweets/breads into the woods for months ahead of the hunt. Shooting a bear with his head inside a blue barrel filled with stale gummy bears doesn't seem a whole lot more sporting than shooting a deer with a spot light.
ToddM
Posted 10/16/2015 1:06 PM (#788838 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 20230


Location: oswego, il
Our gun laws.were written when we had muskets so the ancestry argument is mute.

As I read it, you have to have a mound to be shooting at. Which most likely means a fairly fixed location. Can they bait? My only concerns would be impact of numbers, unless there is some sort of quota.
ARmuskyaddict
Posted 10/16/2015 1:09 PM (#788839 - in reply to #788838)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this





Posts: 2024


Mute/moot... their you go... or is it they're?
jaultman
Posted 10/16/2015 2:13 PM (#788844 - in reply to #788838)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 1828


ToddM - 10/16/2015 1:06 PM
My only concerns would be impact of numbers, unless there is some sort of quota.

Exactly. I really hate the thought of shining and gunning deer as much as the next guy, but if it doesn't change their harvest numbers, what's the difference?

All arguments of what is "sporting" and/or "ethical" are so relative and emotion-based that they don't hold any water.

If they can safely harvest deer at night and maintain the herd, then whatever, have at it. Personally, I don't feel it's safe, or easy to regulate, but I strongly believe personal preferences shouldn't play a role.

Also, totally agree that the DNR screwed up by allowing night-hunting for wolves. Came back to haunt them.
ghoti
Posted 10/16/2015 3:58 PM (#788869 - in reply to #788650)
Subject: Re: Anyone one else see this




Posts: 1279


Location: Stevens Point, Wi.
I think the biggest concern with this ruling is going to be all the extra wasted time spent by DNR wardens responding to the night shooting. Is it a legal or illegal shooter? I'll bet their phones will be busy.
I'm sure the poachers are licking their chops with this new opportunity.
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)