Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Best place for a 40 pounder? |
Message Subject: Best place for a 40 pounder? | |||
R/T |
| ||
Posts: 89 | If 40lbs was the goal my vote goes to Eagle Lake, ON. It has a history and I have seen a 54.5" 45 lb fish harvested back in the late 90s. | ||
Craig Holland |
| ||
Posts: 52 | Larry Ramsell - 10/16/2018 8:20 AM Craig Holland: The Ohio record is legit...April caught fish when it was full of eggs. Manitou Dan: If you like long and skinny, you'd love the 65-incher caught on the Ottawa River near Ottawa this year...it weighed only 38 pounds! Horsehunter: Is your boat pinstriped like the Yankee uniforms? You are indeed in HUGE muskie heaven! Sorry I didn't realize who stated this fish was legit.i wasn't paying attention to the username. I guess my mind is changed. If anyone would know if it was a legit fish it would be Mr ramsell. Thanks for weighing in with your opinion, sorry again, didn't mean to doubt your credibility. | ||
Sudszee |
| ||
Posts: 152 | Any pics of that 65? Bet its head is yuuuge. | ||
IAJustin |
| ||
Posts: 2015 | My boat, next week..full moon and 44 degree water sounds deadly!, a big blonde Cisco muncher wants her picture taken I can feel it... Cheers to the chase!!! | ||
Top H2O |
| ||
Posts: 4080 Location: Elko - Lake Vermilion | IAJustin - 10/16/2018 3:34 PM My boat, next week..full moon and 44 degree water sounds deadly!, a big blonde Cisco muncher wants her picture taken I can feel it... Cheers to the chase!!! Gee,... Wonder where your going to be | ||
Larry Ramsell |
| ||
Posts: 1291 Location: Hayward, Wisconsin | No verification on the 65 incher, but sure looks like it could be that long. Heard of a 66 years ago from there also, but no pic or verification. "IF" it was 65, it would be the longest I'm aware of. Will try and post the pic, but if no luck I'll send it to Mr. Worrall to post. | ||
BNelson |
| ||
Location: Contrarian Island | here it is. Attachments ---------------- 65.jpg (40KB - 298 downloads) | ||
Craig Holland |
| ||
Posts: 52 | In fisherman had a video of a 65 incher out of Cass lake as well. It was and older video though. | ||
BigC |
| ||
Location: On the O | Pretty sure that was last year and looks more like a Larry fish then an Ottawa fish imo. The Ottawa is more like chocolate milk then an emerald blue. Might be closer to where the two meet then near the city of Ottawa. Lots of guys around there max out at 5'4" Edited by BigC 10/17/2018 1:23 PM | ||
bturg |
| ||
Posts: 716 | That is a cool fish, thanks for throwing it up. XXL Length is cool and XXL girth is cool. Get both and you have a true freak and the giants in any species are freaks. | ||
woodieb8 |
| ||
Posts: 1529 | definatly st clair. right time of years theres some piggies. green bay fish are originally from st cl stock.. as said its about timing . I live here 1 mile from l.s.c. boat ramp. | ||
JakeStCroixSkis |
| ||
Posts: 1425 Location: St. Lawrence River | BigC - 10/17/2018 2:21 PM Pretty sure that was last year and looks more like a Larry fish then an Ottawa fish imo. The Ottawa is more like chocolate milk then an emerald blue. Might be closer to where the two meet then near the city of Ottawa. Lots of guys around there max out at 5'4" :) i immediately thought franny when i saw it.. | ||
BNelson |
| ||
Location: Contrarian Island | LSC for the best place for a 40 lber? huh? likely best place for a 50 incher but wouldn't put it in the top 10 for a 40 lber… | ||
Craig Holland |
| ||
Posts: 52 | I was thinking that. A lot of really good fish , but maybe not as many monster s as GB. Green Bay worth the extra 6 hour drive for a biggy in the fall? | ||
SouthernONTgent |
| ||
Posts: 6 | That pic of the 65 is impressive! We have some pigs in GB, personally I don't think I've reached the 40lber mark but then again I don't weigh 'em. Couple that have been darn close. Still my vote would be the Larry for your best shot. | ||
jvlast15 |
| ||
Posts: 303 | BNelson - 10/17/2018 9:55 AM here it is. Wait wait wait...so this is a verified 65" fish? Hasnt there been thread after thread after thread on here about 60" fish dont exist? And now we have a verified sixty FIVE inch fish? I guess I would have thought there would have been a lot more talk about it. | ||
BNelson |
| ||
Location: Contrarian Island | did you read Larrys post above? | ||
undersized |
| ||
Posts: 93 | BNelson - 10/18/2018 3:09 PM did you read Larrys post above? I don't see anything about that measurement being "verified." Doesn't mean it wasn't, I just don't see any evidence. If a vertical hold picture is all that's required, Louis Spray is back on top! | ||
Rudedog |
| ||
Posts: 624 Location: S.W. WI | This fish makes Louie's look like a 48" Edited by Rudedog 10/18/2018 7:14 PM | ||
Ciscokid82 |
| ||
Posts: 333 Location: SE Wisc | I think as a fisherman progresses they look to catch “ heavier” fish, not necessarily longer fish, although the two are usually linked. A skinny 50” muskie that weighs 20 pounds probably won’t excite a guy who’s caught fish over 40 pounds, like it would for the guy breaking the 50” mark for the first time. I think there are more opportunities to catch true trophy size fish now then most times in our history and though a 40# is uncommon it is very doable and actually probable if you’re fishing the right water at the right time of year. The problem for most guys is that they’ve got their boat in storage when they should still be fishing. The fish are there and in more waters than most people think, not just the big Great Lakes systems. | ||
Craig Holland |
| ||
Posts: 52 | I fish til it freezes. I live in Ohio so deer hunting often takes priority as we also have some monster deer. | ||
Ciscokid82 |
| ||
Posts: 333 Location: SE Wisc | Craig Holland - 10/18/2018 9:43 PM I fish til it freezes. I live in Ohio so deer hunting often takes priority as we also have some monster deer. It’s the same(hunting) in all states in the Midwest. I’m a huge hunter too so it really is a tough decision. You often have the deer rut or opener of gun season corresponding with whitefish or Cisco spawns across the north. Some years I’ve had to make a choice of which I was going to persue. I’m fortunate to be self employed so I can wait for ideal conditions/ times to take off work however muskie trips usually need to be booked in advance so I usually do a fall trip around Halloween then come home and bowhunt first week of November. Greatest time of the year! | ||
supertrollr |
| ||
unfortunately 40 pounder body of water are mostly (if you are lucky )1 fish per trip not by angler but per boat. im talking about georgian bay, nip issing and the st-lawrence portion around 40 acres shoal . i guess that's why too much musky for the available forage rarely produce giant. you got 2 choices. body of waters loaded of muskys like lsc that rarely produce giant (no 30 pound fish are no giant) or you got the low fish density but the real possibility to catch fish of a life time | |||
Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
Copyright © 2024 OutdoorsFIRST Media |