|
|
| Is there a huge difference between the two nets? The cost is quite a bit. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 663
| It's all about the size. For musky I'd only use the Big Game or Big Kahuna in the Power Catch series http://frabill.com/landing-nets/powercatch-nets.html?SID=f67ciijmfe... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 75
| I highly recommend what ever Frabill you go with that you get the one with the Thicker Netting. The thinner crap is junk when you are dealing with big toothy critters and big hooks. My 1st year of musky fishing I had 2 mid 40's fish in the bag and power right through that Cheaper Frabill Musky Net! That year sucked! lol
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 218
| The Big Game and Big Kahuna which are the two "musky size" nets in the Power Catch series both have the heavier coated netting. The thinner netting is on the Conservation series. |
|
| |
|
| The reason I ask is because Fleet farm had a Power Catch 32"x41" (#8430), the same size as the "Big Game", but without the flat bottom net.
The #8430, #8435, #8440, #8445 all have the same net (As far as I can tell on the internet).
But the same size: 32"x 41" Big Game, has the flat bottom net. Are you all saying the net on this one is better/stronger?
Unfortuately, I have no one near me that carries all of these nets.
Thanks.
|
|
| |
