|
|
Posts: 1438
| http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/112667509.html?page=1
|
|
|
|
Posts: 2361
|
Well, let's see, WI is too far inland and flat for mountaintop removal, so I am guessing the next best thing is to remove wetland designations as quickly and painlessly as possible. Read that as mining and urban blight.
Pretty much says screw you to sportsman of either party. |
|
|
|
Posts: 32892
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Everything normal in the process our state employs for the leadership of our DNR. Politics. |
|
|
|
Posts: 829
Location: Maple Grove, MN | As long as the same requirements are met for the permits, it shouldn't matter. After all, applications are supposed to be approved on their merits. But if the requirements are changed for the worse through either law or administration changes, then we might have something to worry about.
Just my thoughts.
Edited by Herb_b 1/1/2011 7:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Posts: 2361
| Herb_b - 1/1/2011 7:54 PM
As long as the same requirements are met for the permits, it shouldn't matter. After all, applications are supposed to be approved on their merits. But if the requirements are changed for the worse through either law or administration changes, then we might have something to worry about.
Just my thoughts.
This is kind of funny.
How exactly did you think they would "streamline the process"? |
|
|