Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> 58" Or Better
 
58" Or Better
OptionResults
I have seen a 58" or better (or I think I have)14 Votes - [33.33%]
I have caught a 58" or better1 Votes - [2.38%]
I will never see or catch a 58" or better27 Votes - [64.29%]
This is a multiple choice poll.

Message Subject: 58" Or Better
dickP
Posted 8/29/2026 2:09 PM (#1037880 - in reply to #1037820)
Subject: Re: 58" Or Better




Posts: 361


Ya all ‘floats’ are not attached to float planes. ??
8HPTROLLER
Posted 8/29/2026 3:26 PM (#1037882 - in reply to #1037820)
Subject: RE: 58" Or Better




Posts: 47


Back in 2009, I had the pleasure of netting a 58.5" musky caught by my late fishing partner Bruce Wisner A thunderstorm was moving in and the fish was cruising the surface when we first saw it. It paid no attention to the first cast Bruce made, but it crushed his globe on the second cast. this was on the 'O'. I have since seen two other fish in that class.
Rich
miket55
Posted 8/29/2026 4:25 PM (#1037883 - in reply to #1037820)
Subject: Re: 58" Or Better




Posts: 1364


Location: E. Tenn
dickP - 8/29/2026 4:15 PM

Ya all ‘floats’ are not attached to float planes. ??


Evidently they shed them come winter..

(photo taken at Sky Harbor Airport/Seaplane base in Duluth MN)

Edited by miket55 8/29/2026 4:52 PM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(P1100008.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments P1100008.JPG (58KB - 30 downloads)
IAJustin
Posted 9/20/2026 8:27 AM (#1037979 - in reply to #1037820)
Subject: Re: 58" Or Better




Posts: 2118


Steve’s example of just landing a 56” and then seeing one considerably larger is interesting, I’d be interested to hear how many Dick P has seen in NW Ontario that might have been 58”? … as Matt pointed out many have zero experience with 53” fish let alone 55”+ fish…I’m sure many saw this a few years ago but google Darcy Cox 55 3/8, (I’d post a pic but not my fish) ..I promise you 90% of muskie anglers see that follow there bait and they think they saw a 60” fish! Heck I’ve been fooled with big fish in the net! Both ways, longer and shorter- they aren’t all built the same …I’ve been a part of 7 fish between 53-57” in my boat - some really fat, one abnormally skinny… when they get over 53” they become increasingly difficult to judge them in the water, and being off 2-3” is common… for me I generally underestimate, I’m thinking of 2 that we moved and then came back and caught… bottom line is a 58”+ is a unicorn on 99% of the waters they inhabit- they aren’t out there acting different than the dozen’s of 54-56” Ontario and MN fish that get caught every year, it’s not that we aren’t using big enough baits… Mike Lazarus has caught plenty over 57” on 8” depth raiders, no he and Thorpe and others out east catch 58” fish because, hmm they are actually there to catch …the problem becomes how many true 58” plus live on say Lotw or eagle? Personally I think you could count them on one hand, on either lake …needle in a haystack!

Edited by IAJustin 9/20/2026 8:37 AM
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)