Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2 3 4
Now viewing page 4 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> 60x29.5?
 
Message Subject: 60x29.5?
esox911
Posted 11/29/2011 9:47 PM (#526535 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?




Posts: 556


Congrats on a lifetime achievement for both angler and captain. Fantastic that it still swims those Waters of the ST. Lawrence where the monsters live. BUT-- I also can't wait for the RECORD ( whatever that # is ) to be VERIFIED with a actual FISH !! just so much B.S. about every large fish that is caught and so many question everything. But here-- there is no doubt that is a GIANT MUSKY !!

Edited by esox911 11/29/2011 9:48 PM
Simple fisherman
Posted 11/30/2011 5:36 AM (#526557 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?




Posts: 69


Location: Pittsburgh
Congratulation Angler and Capt both, hope that feeling on your faces lasts a good long time.
jonnysled
Posted 11/30/2011 10:07 AM (#526578 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?





Posts: 13688


Location: minocqua, wi.
Go Habs!!
Guest
Posted 11/30/2011 2:30 PM (#526607 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?


Hats off to Capt. Clarke on a fish of a life time, possibly a record breaker. Has to be one of the largest to be landed and photographed. One fish no one talks about is the Robert Malo musky. Which if it actually weighed 70lbs., it would have to be the biggest fish to lay in a net ever. Has anyone seen or have pics of the 70lb. fish caught out of the Middle Eau Claire in 1954. I've seen one pic from the freshwater hall of fame. it looks like it just ate a dog. If I am correct it would be the world record had it been weighed on a certified scale.
Guest
Posted 11/30/2011 2:37 PM (#526610 - in reply to #526426)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?


Thank You
PHISHMAN
Posted 11/30/2011 3:32 PM (#526623 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?




Posts: 47


Greatest catch in our time. She is a beast. Do they even make bumpboards that big
dougj
Posted 11/30/2011 5:28 PM (#526643 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?





Posts: 906


Location: Warroad, Mn

That's a giant! Congratulations to the guide and the lucky angler. Quite possible the largest release ever and maybe the biggest muskie ever caught. Great work!

Doug Johnson

Storm Strike
Posted 12/1/2011 10:51 AM (#526750 - in reply to #526643)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?




Posts: 159



Capt.Rich,

Now you know what it must be like to win the Super Bowl and be the MVP!

Amazing fish---Congrats---Way to go!

Couple thoughts---In your opinion-are there even bigger fish in the system she was caught?

What are your personal thoughts on the whole world record Musky controversy?

Practically--will this change anything about the way you fish or approach guiding in general?

Finally--What does it feel like personally to catch the fish every guy out there is chasing?
Don Pfeiffer
Posted 12/1/2011 11:02 AM (#526754 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?




Posts: 929


Location: Rhinelander.
CONGRATS TO THEM, a piggie it is.
kustomboy
Posted 12/1/2011 4:11 PM (#526802 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?





Posts: 256


What a hog! Congrats to everyone involved. You can tell that it is clearly a world-record class monster just by how small the guys fingers look compared to the fish. WOW!
Capt. Rich
Posted 12/1/2011 6:35 PM (#526825 - in reply to #526750)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?


First I would just like to say thanks for all the nice comments.

To answer your questions...

1. Yes I absolutely believe there are bigger fish in the St. Lawrence. We truly have the potential for the world record to come from the waters here in Clayton, NY

2. I always said it would have been good if the old records were froze and honored as historic record. A new category for current records could have be opened and the new rules would be followed by current anglers. It is a shame to bash reputations of anglers who can not speak for themselves. Do I believe there are some records that are not valid? Yes. But that was then and this is now.

3. This will not change anything as far as how I conduct my business.

4. It feels great! I have dreamed about this since I was a young boy. It is very satisfying to accomplish a goal honestly.

Best of luck to all and don't ever stop chasing the big one. There is always a bigger one out there. Mine will be bigger the next time someone catches her.
Muskie_Addict
Posted 12/1/2011 6:56 PM (#526827 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?





Posts: 2


Awesome fish, great job Captain!
Big Pete
Posted 12/1/2011 6:59 PM (#526828 - in reply to #526827)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?





Posts: 36


Location: Terril, IA
Awesome!!!! Congrats Captain Rich, dreams do come true!
MuskyStalker
Posted 12/1/2011 9:58 PM (#526845 - in reply to #526825)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?





Posts: 317


Capt. Rich - 12/1/2011 6:35 PM

First I would just like to say thanks for all the nice comments.

To answer your questions...

1. Yes I absolutely believe there are bigger fish in the St. Lawrence. We truly have the potential for the world record to come from the waters here in Clayton, NY

2. I always said it would have been good if the old records were froze and honored as historic record. A new category for current records could have be opened and the new rules would be followed by current anglers. It is a shame to bash reputations of anglers who can not speak for themselves. Do I believe there are some records that are not valid? Yes. But that was then and this is now.

3. This will not change anything as far as how I conduct my business.

4. It feels great! I have dreamed about this since I was a young boy. It is very satisfying to accomplish a goal honestly.

Best of luck to all and don't ever stop chasing the big one. There is always a bigger one out there. Mine will be bigger the next time someone catches her.


Well done! And thank you for your humble and well said answer. I agree 100%
joemsanderson
Posted 12/2/2011 8:45 AM (#526880 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?




Posts: 150


Location: Central Minnesota
Congrats on an amazing fish. Your philosophy on Muskie fishing is one that should be looked up too. It's people like you that making Muskie fishing the incredible sport it is. Keep up the great work and keep netting those amazing fish.
Fan
Posted 12/2/2011 8:59 AM (#526886 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?


Rich,

It is refreshing to see your humbleness regarding possibly one of the largest fish to be caught and released. You're a class act and a model for others in the industry. Keep up the good work, enjoy your accomplishment, and hit the 40 for an even bigger one!
JeffinPickering
Posted 12/2/2011 9:12 AM (#526887 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?





Posts: 97


Location: Pickering, ON
Congrats on a supertanker!

I can't believe no one has asked yet, but was it a Canadian side (40 acre shoal) fish, or a US side fish?
sworrall
Posted 12/4/2011 8:19 AM (#527187 - in reply to #526886)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?





Posts: 32886


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Fan - 12/2/2011 8:59 AM

Rich,

It is refreshing to see your humbleness regarding possibly one of the largest fish to be caught and released. You're a class act and a model for others in the industry. Keep up the good work, enjoy your accomplishment, and hit the 40 for an even bigger one!


That's a fact. We really appreciate your allowing us to publish the image of the fish, and truly appreciate your participation in this thread. Giant fish.
JakeStCroixSkis
Posted 12/4/2011 6:24 PM (#527267 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: Re: 60x29.5?





Posts: 1425


Location: St. Lawrence River
canadian side
Guest
Posted 12/7/2011 5:23 PM (#527732 - in reply to #526167)
Subject: RE: 60x29.5?


Now that's a mind-boggling Monstosity of a Musky! Kudos to him for the CPR and releasing the Musky back into the water to fight again. I heard he caught it while trolling a big crank with an adjacent shelf or some type of flat off the deep water. He didn't see the Musky on his locater.......the Musky just came out of nowhere and the battle ensued for his newbie Musky client. The Musky had one inch teeth and from what he could "gather" was healthy, robust, and showed plenty more years to grow. Now, the guide says he's after a 61incher, hey I think I'd be pretty elated with a 52. Keep casting those line's fellas because one day you just never know.
Jump to page : 1 2 3 4
Now viewing page 4 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)