|
|
Posts: 1636
| ...
Edited by Reelwise 3/28/2018 6:28 PM
Attachments ---------------- mdnrmuskie.jpg (78KB - 409 downloads)
|
|
|
|
Posts: 304
| So this means what? |
|
|
|
Posts: 770
| The above is what could be kept from the previous bill almost like it was amended.... That's my understanding atleast |
|
|
|
Posts: 560
Location: WI | Quite a few lake front property owners testifying. This bill is nothing more than lake property owners using anti-musky fears to gain more control over the lakes. Minnesota, The Land of 10,000 Gates will be the new slogan in 10 years. |
|
|
|
Posts: 770
| Look at the titles and compare the in favor vs against. Proprlerty owner, property owner property owner, VS president VP, president, commissioner, co- chair, president.
That right there should be enough to make the decision.... The most important people that are in favor of this bill are property owners. |
|
|
|
Posts: 1636
| jvlast15 - 3/28/2018 7:34 PM So this means what?
Probably not a whole lot when it comes to the final decision... but, I'm sure it could be used as somewhat of an influence. |
|
|
|
Posts: 267
| The scary thing will be what they try to sneak into the Omnibus Bill and try to rush through. |
|
|
|
Posts: 203
Location: Alexandria, Minnesota | We had a spearing ban on a few Muskie lakes for 20 years and Bill Ingebritson snuck in opening those lakes to spearing on an Omnibus Bill, sure that is what he will try with this Bill... Needs to be called out for the fraud he is.
Edited by Dave Williamson 3/29/2018 4:02 PM
|
|
|
|
| what was the result? |
|
|
|
Posts: 1516
| where is this at? Isn't the session almost over? |
|
|