Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> DNR shocks giant at Mille Lacs |
Message Subject: DNR shocks giant at Mille Lacs | |||
Yep |
| ||
Posts: 31 | Anyone see the giant muskie shocked out of Mille lacs by the DNR? Giant | ||
Brian Hoffies |
| ||
Posts: 1671 | Better post a link or the guys here will BBQ you. | ||
Yep |
| ||
Posts: 31 | Info on how to post a pic? | ||
mnmusky |
| ||
. Attachments ---------------- 60552312_2100117496952584_3165903187966164992_n.jpg (17KB - 538 downloads) | |||
tolle141 |
| ||
Posts: 1000 | tribe shocked it during a pike study. no official measurement, but estimated at 57-59 inches is what I heard | ||
Baby Mallard |
| ||
Dang big fish! Was it released healthy? | |||
Brian Hoffies |
| ||
Posts: 1671 | Baby Mallard - 5/18/2019 4:38 PM Dang big fish! Was it released healthy? LOL......Good one. I've never known them to release anything. | ||
muskiehunter51 |
| ||
Posts: 174 Location: Naperville, IL | The dnr there said that’s not someone from their team. If I can find their post on fb again I’ll link it. It also wasn’t measured it’s a guess, looks to be the locals are out shocking fish. Edited by muskiehunter51 5/18/2019 8:22 PM | ||
Kirby Budrow |
| ||
Posts: 2280 Location: Chisholm, MN | Why the hell wouldn’t you measure it? | ||
Baby Mallard |
| ||
Looks to be a fat pre spawn 50"+ full of eggs anyway. Not sure about shocking fish when fish are trying to spawn. | |||
Pepper |
| ||
Posts: 1516 | muskiehunter51 - 5/18/2019 8:17 PM The dnr there said that’s not someone from their team. If I can find their post on fb again I’ll link it. It also wasn’t measured it’s a guess, looks to be the locals are out shocking fish. So locals can go shock fish as the mood strikes them? | ||
Dan111 |
| ||
Location: ontario | Its a pig with fins | ||
Smell_Esox |
| ||
Posts: 267 | If it was tribal fish sampling it would have been GLIFWIC. They are biologists and fisheries employees hired by the tribe and would be qualified fisheries people. If they were sampling walleyes, they may not have had a long enough bump board aboard to measure such a long fish. | ||
North of 8 |
| ||
When the DNR did a comprehensive survey of the chain I live back about 10 years ago, it was three parts. First they set nets right after ice out. Game fish were measured, sexed and then fin clipped. Then two days before the general opener they came back after dark and shocked. There they counted fish and counted the percentage of game fish that were fin clipped. They did not measure each fish and after they shocked they used a mathematical formula based on netted vs shocked to come up with the estimated numbers of fish in the lake. Then a tech spent a lot of time on the lake from the opener until the lake iced over checking with fishermen to get a count of fish boated by species, etc. So the only time fish were actually measured was out of the nets. Maybe that is what was happening here, shocking for a count but not measuring? | |||
Cfollow |
| ||
https://www.twincities.com/2019/06/29/possible-world-record-muskie-b... 61.5" JUST WOW!!!!!! | |||
mikie |
| ||
Location: Athens, Ohio | "It doesn't look and inch bigger than 59!" well, someone had to say it. m | ||
supertrollr |
| ||
a real monster ,no bs ,fish inch away from the cam.look the head ,it's gigantic | |||
happy hooker |
| ||
Posts: 3136 | We're actually thinking of having the leader of the crew has a speaker at our Twin Cities MI meeting,,there could be some pretty cool info to hear about on M Lacs and other waters. | ||
ToddM |
| ||
Posts: 20181 Location: oswego, il | Cfollow - 6/30/2019 3:42 PM https://www.twincities.com/2019/06/29/possible-world-record-muskie-b... 61.5" JUST WOW!!!!!! Some goof got on one of the Facebook groups and made for a funny read about this article. | ||
supertrollr |
| ||
couldn't be the same fish Edited by supertrollr 7/1/2019 10:58 AM | |||
esoxaddict |
| ||
Posts: 8723 | Seems like the same guy in both pictures, so I'd say it probably is. #*^@ shame they didn't have a scale big enough to weigh the fish, or a girth tape. It would be very interesting to compare length/girth and actual weight to the formulas. Oh well. At least we know they get to 61.5" Provided that measurement was accurate, that is. I really wish someone would catch that fish and put all the previous (questionable) records in the past for good. I wonder how many more guys are going to be fishing Mille Lacs this year... | ||
supertrollr |
| ||
then the other pics is that bad that the fish don'T even look that big | |||
muskiehunter51 |
| ||
Posts: 174 Location: Naperville, IL | Pepper - 5/19/2019 3:41 PM muskiehunter51 - 5/18/2019 8:17 PM The dnr there said that’s not someone from their team. If I can find their post on fb again I’ll link it. It also wasn’t measured it’s a guess, looks to be the locals are out shocking fish. So locals can go shock fish as the mood strikes them? That’s what it seemed at first, with the new info out it looks like I was incorrect in what i read in the beginning. | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
Copyright © 2024 OutdoorsFIRST Media |