|
|
| Big differences between them? Smoothness, durabily? Going to be top water jerk baits rod. Always a shimano guy, looking to save a few bucks. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 546
Location: MN | Both are good reels, but I think you might be happier sticking with Shimano and going 300e or 300ej. They are very durable and cost less than the nacl. I own both a 300E and 50 Nacl. The 300e is more comfortable, and although the big foam handles of the Nacl make it feel like a powerhouse, I feel that the 300e is more durable and is a smoother reel. For your application, I would suggest the 300e or 300ej. Is there a reason why you are looking at the 300D over the E? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 432
Location: Eagan, MN | I have both, well my nacl is a 60 hs. Pretty much comparable. I like the power handle on the nacl. The 300d is noticeably smoother, but I don't see where that smoothness translates into actual performance --- casting distance is the same as far as I can tell. Maybe the shimano will be more durable in the long run, maybe not. I added a power handle to the 300d. I consider them interchangeable. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 127
| cast10K - 7/10/2013 1:23 PM
The 300d is noticeably smoother, but I don't see where that smoothness translates into actual performance
Smoothness can typically be attributed to less friction in the gearing. Less friction means more energy is translated through the gears, thus more cranking power when compared to gears of a similar size and ratio. Now is it enough to translate into actual performance? I believe it does, but that is subjective and is absolutely up to the eye of the beholder!
Having a dual bearing supported pinion gear and the pinion gear placement in relation to the drive gear (X-Ship) is a awesome feature in the new Shimano reels. Generally speaking, Shimano's gears have always been an advantage in comparison to the competition.
My Calcutta D is one of the smoothest reels I have ever operated. Only one that compares is a Shimano Stella in my book. |
|
| |
