Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> Lures,Tackle, and Equipment -> Swim Whizz vs. Believer
 
Message Subject: Swim Whizz vs. Believer
backdraft
Posted 5/17/2013 7:45 AM (#641842)
Subject: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 241


These two lures look very similar - are they essentially the same thing?

Backdraft
horsehunter
Posted 5/17/2013 8:22 AM (#641849 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Location: Eastern Ontario
Basicly the same as the Grandma Jake story
ToddM
Posted 5/17/2013 8:41 AM (#641852 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer





Posts: 20219


Location: oswego, il
kind of like alien vs predator
cast10K
Posted 5/17/2013 10:30 AM (#641876 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 432


Location: Eagan, MN
They basically do the same thing. In the past at least, I've found believers to be made with much tighter tolerances and as a result were easier to get to run right. Also had a few leaking swim whizzes. Don't know if ol' homer's QC has improved since then.
JKahler
Posted 5/17/2013 4:26 PM (#641919 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 1289


Location: WI
I have friends that troll a lot and say they like the SW more. If the Swim Whiz were bigger maybe I'd use them more. As far as Jakes vs Grandmas...Grandmas hands down! No contest in terms of productivity there.
ILmuskie
Posted 5/18/2013 7:18 AM (#641978 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer





Posts: 371


Location: Dixon, IL
I was thinking same thing and I see that Believer is little lighter than Swim Whizz.

Swim Whizz 8 inch jointed 2.4oz
Believer 8 inch jointed 1.9oz

I guess that Believer have little more hallow inside than Swim Whizz. I think that Swim Whizz is first by Homer LeBlanc Original.
tundrawalker00
Posted 5/18/2013 10:23 AM (#641998 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 504


Location: Ludington, MI
Swim Whizzs require more tuning and don't have the speed or turning tolerances that Believers do, in my experience.
brandonn
Posted 5/18/2013 4:19 PM (#642022 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 4


they make 16 inch swim whiz. rollie and helens sells them. swizz. they arte like 80 bucks though.
larryc
Posted 5/18/2013 6:14 PM (#642031 - in reply to #642022)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 173


Swizz is a custom lure . Several others around made by custom bait makers both US and Canada.
For the comment that Drifter copied Homer's original : Homer copied a lure very closely himself to develop the Swim Whizz. Original lure was made pre World War 1 .
I have too many Whizzes , Believers and a few of the solid resin customs. They still catch fish . Muskies are lazy and won't watch fishing shows or read MH . Delivery of the R&H catalog is problematic too.
Guest
Posted 5/18/2013 9:34 PM (#642055 - in reply to #642022)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer


brandonn - 5/18/2013 4:19 PM

they make 16 inch swim whiz. rollie and helens sells them. swizz. they arte like 80 bucks though.


Your mixing these up a swizz is a swizz hand made out of wood in 16", a swim whiz comes as big as 13" that's it
JKahler
Posted 5/19/2013 12:12 AM (#642086 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 1289


Location: WI
The biggest Swim Whizz is only 8". The 13" is the Believer.
rfraver
Posted 5/19/2013 5:32 AM (#642090 - in reply to #642086)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 30


Swim wiz made some 12" protos last year. I hope they start selling them soon, but haven't heard anything as of yet
Guest
Posted 5/19/2013 4:25 PM (#642155 - in reply to #642086)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer


JKahler - 5/19/2013 12:12 AM

The biggest Swim Whizz is only 8". The 13" is the Believer.


The biggest is SWIM WHIZ is 13" NOT 8" I own a few and heres a lot more out in the market and Im sure they will be mass produced soon enough
JKahler
Posted 5/20/2013 1:28 AM (#642242 - in reply to #642155)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 1289


Location: WI
Guest - 5/19/2013 4:25 PM

JKahler - 5/19/2013 12:12 AM

The biggest Swim Whizz is only 8". The 13" is the Believer.


The biggest is SWIM WHIZ is 13" NOT 8" I own a few and heres a lot more out in the market and Im sure they will be mass produced soon enough


Got a link? I searched online before I posted that and 8" was the biggest I could find.
rfraver
Posted 5/20/2013 10:21 AM (#642278 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 30


Their website lists 6 and 8 " sizes. I've seen a lot of 13" believers, but never a 13" whizz. Wouldn't be the first time I was wrong today though
CU301DSV
Posted 5/20/2013 10:50 AM (#642285 - in reply to #642278)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer





Posts: 906


Location: Canada
Here's a a pic of two prototype Swim Whizz's that were made last? year:


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(protoswimwizzes.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments protoswimwizzes.jpg (68KB - 498 downloads)
Reef Hawg
Posted 5/20/2013 12:03 PM (#642302 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 3518


Location: north central wisconsin
On a simple note, Believers have rattles, Swim Whizz do not. That holds true on at least the ones I own.
horsehunter
Posted 5/20/2013 12:39 PM (#642305 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Location: Eastern Ontario
Older Believers have no rattles new ones can be ordered without for additional cost. Never understood why 81mg asprin cost 3 times as much as 325 mg, Or salt free, fat free, or susar free products cost more. My sugar Free caffeine free calorie free cola should be free there's nothing in it.
Old Guy
Posted 5/20/2013 2:11 PM (#642324 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer


CU301DSV

Any idea how much each of those 2 prototypes weighed?
rfraver
Posted 5/20/2013 4:33 PM (#642361 - in reply to #642324)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 30


Heres some more, if I can get the link to work


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(image.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments image.jpg (137KB - 504 downloads)
Guest
Posted 5/20/2013 8:22 PM (#642393 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: RE: Swim Whizz vs. Believer


If they weighed in at about 4 1/2 oz I bet the trolling action could be tremendous as erratic motion can result from a highly buoyant lure for the weight. plus they would still be have a reasonable weight for casting.
Lots of potential here.
What was the action like when trolled?
Any idea if there will be a jointed model?
rfraver
Posted 5/20/2013 10:01 PM (#642406 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 30


Both of the images above came off of swim wizzes FB page. They said they would be in production this year. That's all I know about them
JKahler
Posted 5/21/2013 2:14 AM (#642418 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 1289


Location: WI
Cool, thanks for the pics!
ILmuskie
Posted 5/21/2013 6:38 AM (#642427 - in reply to #641842)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer





Posts: 371


Location: Dixon, IL
I am thinking about to buy two 8 inch for trolling but not sure which is better jointed or straight?
bigbite
Posted 5/21/2013 7:06 AM (#642431 - in reply to #642427)
Subject: Re: Swim Whizz vs. Believer




Posts: 1348


Location: Pewaukee, WI
Sent you a PM.
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)