Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
| Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
| Jump to page : 1 2 3 Now viewing page 3 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Biggest Minnesota Musky in 2011 |
| Message Subject: Biggest Minnesota Musky in 2011 | |||
| Herb_b |
| ||
Posts: 829 Location: Maple Grove, MN | Jerome, I hear you. Finding big fish on Minnetonka can be very, very difficult. But that is what allows those fish to get so big. The whole thing is that those big fish do not hang out where other Muskies hang out. The people you mention are all very good fishermen, but that doesn't mean they are fishing where the largest Muskies on Tonka are or throwing the right bait at the right time in the right spot. The Big V is almost the opposite. The big fish there are much easier to find. I was finding +55 inch Muskies last summer on my second day there. Getting them to eat was another story, but finding them was easy. Can you say "around the rock bar in the middle of the lake"? Same can be said for Mille Lacs. Lots of water, but still only so much structure. Minnetonka has so much more structure for the Muskies to hang out in. Miles and miles of milfoil weedlines, many shallow areas with cabbage and/or rocks, every single bay - both large and small, many sunken humps, the many points, the deep edges, the secondary breaks, and the open water with all the schools of baitfish can all hold Muskies. I sometimes find Minnetonka overwhelming by the amazing number of locations the fish can be. They can be virtually anywhere and all to often it seems they are nowhere. Just finding any Muskie on some days is a challenge in itself. Finding the really big ones is often like looking for a needle in a very large hay stack. Which bay? Shallow or deep? Deep edge or secondary break? And then try to fit that into a six hour outing? Good luck. That is why many people don't see the really big Muskies on Tonka. Finding them is almost impossible. Sometimes I wonder why I even fish the ^#@$@#%!!! lake! OK, now I'm just complaining. Good luck on the Big V this year. Hope you catch one of those big girls. Herb Edited by Herb_b 6/7/2011 4:59 PM | ||
| Guest |
| ||
| Woman | |||
| Guest |
| ||
| That's very interesting. I never knew Lake Minnetonka was so structured, and big fish were hard to find. It makes me want to fish it more for the challenge. I am fishing Cass/Bemidji in July, and i have a feeling the Bemidji could produce the heaviest fish. Mille Lacs might win that one too. | |||
| Hammskie |
| ||
Posts: 697 Location: Minnetonka | I love Tonka just as much as the next guy but I don't think the biggest fish in 2011 will come from there. Especially since Herb says all the big ones from Tonka are kept a secret, and nobody but Herb can catch them because they're all on weird spots and only respond to obscure presentations. :-P At the risk of sounding cliché, I think the "biggest" fish of 2011 will come from Mille Lacs or Vermilion, judging by the results of the last decade... at least the results that I am aware of. Maybe the secret file of documented Tonka 50-lbers will be leaked to the public this year as well??? Herb_b - 6/7/2011 4:48 PM The Big V is almost the opposite. The big fish there are much easier to find. I was finding +55 inch Muskies last summer on my second day there. If I ever fished a lake where it was easy to find 55+ inch muskies, I'm not sure I'd waste my time on any other lake, especially if that lake was scenic Lake Vermilion. | ||
| Tim Schmitz |
| ||
Posts: 540 Location: MN | Andy I'll email you the top-secret tonka 50# file later today. Then if your not busy tonight we can go chase a few of them down. LOL | ||
| Herb_b |
| ||
Posts: 829 Location: Maple Grove, MN | Never said that I'm the only that can find big fish there. Hardly. What I am saying is that the big fish in Minnetonka don't hang out on the community spots. That and most people fish at or near the community spots. In over ten years of Muskie fishing on Minnetonka, I can remember seeing only two really big fish at community spots. The big fish seem to move off the community spots very quickly and go to areas of the lake where they aren't harassed so much. The smaller fish often seem to frequent the community spots no matter how heavy the fishing pressure gets. Sometimes there are four or five boats on a spot and the fish are still there. Just not the really big ones. As for the 50 lbers, the one near my login was near that size and I have seen larger fish as well. But then seeing and catching are two different things. I have also seen pictures of larger Muskies caught from Minnetonka. Like the other lakes, the fish do seem to top out around 40-50 lbs. Not many caught in any lakes that are much larger than that. As for the structure on Minnetonka - just look at it. With few exceptions, the miles of shoreline throughout the entire lake are wrapped with milfoil in the 7 to 12 ft depth range. There are many different bays and a lot of water to cover. There are many points, humps and rock bars scattered throughout the lake. Combine that with the Muskies being very mobile and moving often and it makes the fish hard to find at times. I have talked to many fishermen who don't fish Minnetonka because its just to hard to find the Muskies there. The truth is that the smaller metro lakes are much easier to fish and its not like the smaller lakes don't hold nice fish too. And I am not saying that I think the largest Muskie will come from Minnetonka this year. Could, but not likely. If I would make a bet, I'd guess Mille Lacs or the big V as the two most likely to produce the largest fish. Why? There are more large fish in those lakes and the fish are, generally speaking, easier to find there. But the biggest could come from many other lakes too. Minnetonka is just one of many good lakes in this state. I fished Leech Lake this weekend and we saw a couple of +50 inch Muskies. And one of those big fish hit my daughter's lure on a figure-8. All she got was a big splash at boat side, but she hasn't stopped talking about it since. The important thing about fishing is to have fun. If what you're doing isn't fun, then do something else. Lots of lakes to choose from. The MN DNR has done a tremendous job, haven't they? Good luck all. Edited by Herb_b 6/13/2011 9:45 AM | ||
| guest |
| ||
| About 10 years ago my boat partner and I discovered a clue as to the curious Minnetonka pattern. It seemed our smallest fish were next to the largest mansions and the biggest fish were located near the smallest cabins. Perhaps there is a pattern developing in regards to finding the obscure locations. | |||
| Herb_b |
| ||
Posts: 829 Location: Maple Grove, MN | Actually, the big fish tend to just move away from the fishing pressure..... | ||
| Al Swearingen |
| ||
| 40#???? 50#?????? Wow, these numbers get thrown around an awful lot. 80% of muskie anglers have never seen a LEGIT one(40 or 50#) , let alone held one. They are a different class altogether. More rare than we think. | |||
| Herb_b |
| ||
Posts: 829 Location: Maple Grove, MN | The point I'm trying to make is that the really big fish tend to be in different areas. And just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there. That holds true on most lakes. 40# to 50# fish are indeed rare and catching one is even more rare. But they are becoming less rare every year. What I find amazing is how some of the guides such as Luke, Gregg, and Jason, can find and catch those big fish year after year. | ||
| Jump to page : 1 2 3 Now viewing page 3 [30 messages per page] |
| Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |


Copyright © 2026 OutdoorsFIRST Media |