Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors -> Tuffy or Ranger?
 
Reply New post
Message Subject: Tuffy or Ranger?
shaley
Posted 11/12/2010 7:40 PM (#466518 - in reply to #466512)
Subject: Re: Tuffy or Ranger?





Posts: 1184


Location: Iowa Great Lakes
I have the Skeeter version and a great ride, has taken all V has wanted to give me with ease.....
kodiak
Posted 11/15/2010 11:43 AM (#466783 - in reply to #466484)
Subject: Re: Tuffy or Ranger?





Posts: 1224


Location: Okoboji
JRedig - 11/12/2010 3:27 PM

kodiak - 11/12/2010 3:08 PM

forgot to add, i have been in some nasty stuff with my 17 and it got me through almost dry


What exactly does "nasty stuff" mean? Mille lacs in 20mph winds? Or tonka?


mille lacs like stuff, nasty prop come out of water stuff.
MuskieMike
Posted 11/15/2010 11:45 AM (#466784 - in reply to #463416)
Subject: RE: Tuffy or Ranger?





Location: Des Moines IA
I've had my 1700's prop clean out of the water a few times as well. That hull takes a beatin' and keeps on runnin'.
kodiak
Posted 11/15/2010 8:37 PM (#466878 - in reply to #463416)
Subject: Re: Tuffy or Ranger?





Posts: 1224


Location: Okoboji
Yeah I was in smiths bay in west boji during the easter seals walleye tourney this spring and I went across some stuff I had no buisness in. Shaley can attest to how bad that lake can get. It isn't a 20 footer but she can handle some stuff..I wanna know what a 1990 Tuffy with a big etec can go through?

Edited by kodiak 11/15/2010 8:38 PM
guest
Posted 12/1/2010 7:07 AM (#468705 - in reply to #463416)
Subject: RE: Tuffy or Ranger?


Sworral, any chance of the X176 being at Chicago?
sworrall
Posted 12/1/2010 7:43 AM (#468706 - in reply to #468705)
Subject: RE: Tuffy or Ranger?





Posts: 32880


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
The new X170 T and the new Osprey 21' model will be there, the X176 is probably looking like a Milwaukee show addition.
guest
Posted 12/1/2010 8:10 AM (#468710 - in reply to #463416)
Subject: RE: Tuffy or Ranger?


Is it too early for dimensions on the 176? Curious about beam and perhaps a rough idea of what it will be capable of for rough water?

sworrall
Posted 12/1/2010 8:16 AM (#468711 - in reply to #463416)
Subject: Re: Tuffy or Ranger?





Posts: 32880


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Dimensions are not in stone yet, but boat will be a 17 1/2 foot class, rate at 150, and run the same waters the X190 will. This boat will be the X190's little sister.
Mak51
Posted 12/1/2010 5:34 PM (#468763 - in reply to #468711)
Subject: Re: Tuffy or Ranger?




Location: MN
Wow, I would imagine a 17.5ft boat which is lighter than the X-190 with a 150 will fly!

Do they have any idea on pricing yet? Gussing a little early for this question...

Edited by Mak51 12/1/2010 5:39 PM
muskyone
Posted 12/10/2010 1:00 PM (#469883 - in reply to #463898)
Subject: Re: Tuffy or Ranger?





Posts: 1536


Location: God's Country......USA..... Western Wisconsin
Ranger has a 1760 Angler in it's lineup. The "Angler Series" was absorbed into the Fisherman lineup for 2011. The boat is 17' 6" long with a 94" beam rated to 150 HP. Nice looking boat, 4 seats, front and rear storage, live well and bait well, center rod locker. (up to 7'6" rods)The largest drawback to any of the less than 19' to 20' boats is length of rod storage. Hard to put 8 and 9 footers in a 17' to 18' boat rod locker.
DJS
Posted 2/4/2011 1:35 PM (#479750 - in reply to #463416)
Subject: RE: Tuffy or Ranger?


Any fresh news on the X-176 yet?
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]
Reply New post
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)