|
|
| After all the controversy about the
largest musky ever caught legally,
which record should be recognized?
Art Lawton's 69lb 15 oz. fish......
Louis Spray's 69lb plus.......
The 70lb Malo musky......
The 65lb plus fish from Georgian Bay????
Another fish we should know about??
So confusing..........[:knockout:]
John S.
Believe in Seamonsters |
|
| |
|
| I would love to say one of the Wisconsin fish, but with all the controvery over those fish I feel the 65lber., caught out ot Georgian Bay, should be the record. It kills me because the guy was fishing for walleyes and nothing to gain by the fish. It was witness and weighed by people. Al[:blackeye:] |
|
| |
|
| I feel that Louis Spray's fish should be the current world record. |
|
| |
|
| I say we set all the records to zero and start new this year.[:)]
Dave |
|
| |
|
| I would like all of you to recognize my world record which I plan on catching this summer! 70 lbs.+, just to take the doubt out of it! |
|
| |
|
| Legitimately speaking, Malo's is the biggest ever caught. Technically speaking, O'Brien's is the Record. My opinions |
|
| |
|
| Here's a pretty good link with some photos of those monsters of yesterday.
http://www.geocities.com/toothycritters/giantmuskies.html |
|
| |
|
| Cant we just start over....and give everyone a chance.
How about starting at 1/1/00 |
|
| |
|
| Larry Ramsell was right...we should not start over... I was wrong with that statement...Please forgive me..
Those that have caught record muskies in the past should be rewarded. |
|
| |
