Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: After about a half-mile the fella stopped and stooped over, with his hands on his thigh's to catch his breath, and the Game Warden finally caught up to him."Let's see yer fishin' license, boy," the Warden gasped.
- (Added by: FISHFINDER101)

Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

More Muskie Fishing -> Basement Baits and Custom Lure Painting -> Maple or pine
 
Message Subject: Maple or pine
past.the.cast.mike
Posted 2/14/2017 11:32 AM (#849730)
Subject: Maple or pine





Posts: 109


I know lots of guys love using cedar for lure making, how would maple or pine work for a crank or glide bait? What would be the benifit or downside to using these other types of wood?
musky513
Posted 2/15/2017 9:07 AM (#849837 - in reply to #849730)
Subject: Re: Maple or pine




Posts: 531


Either of those types of wood should work. The properties of the wood will have an effect on the buoyancy and how the bait moves. I mostly use cedar for my baits, which is very buoyant. Harder woods are less so if I recall correctly...
esox911
Posted 2/15/2017 4:46 PM (#849911 - in reply to #849730)
Subject: RE: Maple or pine




Posts: 556


Maple works good for gliders since it is already heavy and thus easy to weight.... Pine could certainly be used for a crank---lots use pine for topwater and dive/rise baits
North of 8
Posted 2/16/2017 8:01 AM (#849963 - in reply to #849730)
Subject: Re: Maple or pine




I have a glider made by a friend that is maple and it has just the right buoyancy for a glide bait. It is not real large but heavier than you would expect. Have caught a couple fish on it and it still looks brand new.
past.the.cast.mike
Posted 2/16/2017 2:01 PM (#850026 - in reply to #849911)
Subject: RE: Maple or pine





Posts: 109


esox911 - 2/15/2017 5:46 PM

Maple works good for gliders since it is already heavy and thus easy to weight.... Pine could certainly be used for a crank---lots use pine for topwater and dive/rise baits


I heard pine is stronger than cedar but pine tends to rot easier. Is this true?
NathanH
Posted 2/16/2017 3:55 PM (#850046 - in reply to #850026)
Subject: RE: Maple or pine





Posts: 859


Location: MN
Cedar is really rot proof and pine is rot prone.
esox911
Posted 2/16/2017 4:41 PM (#850055 - in reply to #850026)
Subject: RE: Maple or pine




Posts: 556


I would say YES Pine would Rot faster than Cedar----But SUICKS are made of pine and I have some that are 40 yrs old--original round belly models that I still use today---Not much paint on them and they soak up water---BUT--they have never rotted-----I think ROT is absolutely Nothing to worry about--If a Pine Lure lasts 40 yrs--what more could you want.
past.the.cast.mike
Posted 2/21/2017 9:59 AM (#850569 - in reply to #850055)
Subject: RE: Maple or pine





Posts: 109


esox911 - 2/16/2017 5:41 PM

I would say YES Pine would Rot faster than Cedar----But SUICKS are made of pine and I have some that are 40 yrs old--original round belly models that I still use today---Not much paint on them and they soak up water---BUT--they have never rotted-----I think ROT is absolutely Nothing to worry about--If a Pine Lure lasts 40 yrs--what more could you want.


This is true, none of my old wood suicks have rotted. They soak water like crazy now

Edited by past.the.cast.mike 2/21/2017 10:00 AM
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)