MuskieFIRST | Size by size comparison calcutta 400B or TE vs Calcutta 400D » Lures,Tackle, and Equipment

Muskie Discussion Forums

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Moderators: Slamr	View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> Lures,Tackle, and Equipment -> Size by size comparison calcutta 400B or TE vs Calcutta 400D

Message Subject: Size by size comparison calcutta 400B or TE vs Calcutta 400D

jedec

Posted 1/15/2013 10:31 AM (#609944)
Subject: Size by size comparison calcutta 400B or TE vs Calcutta 400D

Posts: 4

Hi Guys,

I'm in the market for a new reel and really can't decide between the 301D or 401D. I owned a 401 TE in the past but got rid of it because it was a tad to wide for my comfort. Can someone make a picture of the 400B / TE next to a 400 or 401D? I live in the Netherlands and this reel isn't available here so I can't check it out in a tackleshop.

Krgds,

Richard

Riverrat351

Posted 1/15/2013 6:02 PM (#610030 - in reply to #609944)
Subject: RE: Size by size comparison calcutta 400B or TE vs Calcutta 400D

Posts: 279

Location: Central Wisconsin

As you can see, the side of the reel you palm is also smaller in diameter which makes it more comfortable.

NOFEAR

Posted 1/15/2013 6:55 PM (#610048 - in reply to #609944)
Subject: Re: Size by size comparison calcutta 400B or TE vs Calcutta 400D

Posts: 208

I own the 400 TE and also own a 400 D. The 400 TE feels big in my hand now after using the 400 D. I use the 400 D on my rubber rod and plan on picking up a 300 D this spring for my jerkbait and glider rod due to the faster line pick up.

Nice Reels IMO

Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread