Muskie Discussion Forums
| ||
Moderators: Slamr | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> New Muskie/Pike Regulations in Michigan |
Message Subject: New Muskie/Pike Regulations in Michigan | |||
JimtenHaaf |
| ||
Posts: 717 Location: Grand Rapids, MI | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Sept. 14, 2012 Contact: Kregg Smith, 269-685-6851 or Ed Golder, 517-335-3014 DNR Fisheries Division recommends regulation changes for muskellunge and northern pike The Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division today announced details for proposed changes to statewide muskellunge and northern pike fishing regulations. Regulation changes were developed after public survey results showed anglers were open to new regulations designed to improve fishing opportunities for northern pike and muskellunge. Fisheries Division staff conducted an internal review of current regulations starting in 2007 and after that solicited broad public input regarding potential changes via separate online and telephone surveys. More than 1,900 responses were received from the public. The proposed changes to current regulations were developed and based upon survey responses and discussions with the Fisheries Division’s Warmwater Resources Steering Committee. Statewide muskellunge regulations are proposed to remain as they currently are except the possession limit would be changed to allow anglers to keep only one muskellunge per season instead of one per day. Muskellunge anglers would also be required to obtain a free harvest tag, similar to a lake sturgeon tag, from any license dealer and would be required to affix it to the muskellunge they intend to keep. The statewide northern pike regulations proposal reflects angler responses to manage and provide for more diverse fishing opportunities compared to muskellunge. The existing regulation, a 24-inch minimum size limit and possession of no more than two per day, would remain on a majority of Michigan’s lakes. The existing regulation of no minimum size limit and a bag limit of five fish per day would be adjusted slightly for lakes with stunted pike populations. The proposal would allow for anglers to still keep five fish per day on selected waters, but only one fish could be 24 inches or longer. Fisheries Division also proposes to eliminate the existing 30-inch northern pike minimum size limit, which has been in place since 2002, on a handful of lakes. Instead a 24- to 34-inch protected slot limit (PSL) is recommended, which means anglers would be required to release any fish measuring from 24 to 34 inches. The PSL would be used on a limited number of lakes across the state. Fisheries Division is recommending adjusting northern pike regulations for a handful of lakes, based on their current population structures. Proposed changes for the 2013 fishing season, which would go into effect April 1, include: Waters changing from 24-inch Minimum Size Limit to No Minimum Size Limit • Nawakwa Lake (Alger County) • Trout (Carp) Lake (Chippewa County) • Eight Point Lake (Clare County) • Lyman Lake (Delta County) • Millecoquins Lake (Mackinac County) • South Manistique Lake (Mackinac County) • Bass (East) Lake (Marquette County) • Shag (Big) Lake (Marquette County) • Pug Lakes (Montmorency County) • Diamond Lake (Osceola County) • Ocqueoc Lake (Presque Isle County) • Tomahawk Flooding (Presque Isle County) Waters changing from 30-inch Minimum Size Limit to 24-inch Minimum Size Limit • Fish Lake (Barry County) • Porter Lake (Iron County) • Cable Lake (Iron County) • Gratiot Lake (Keweenaw County) • Fish Lake (Marquette County) • Grassy Lake (Schoolcraft County) • McKeever Lake (Schoolcraft County) • Big Bass Lake (Schoolcraft County) Waters changing from no Minimum Size Limit to 24- to 34-inch Protected Slot Limit • Pine Creek Flooding (Allegan County) • Bass Lake (Kent County) Waters changing from 24-inch Minimum Size Limit to 24- to 34-inch Protected Slot Limit • Long Lake (Kalamazoo County, Pavilion Township) • Blind Sucker Flooding (Luce County) • Bodi Lake (Luce County) • Townline Lake (Montcalm County) The final decision regarding the proposed northern pike and muskellunge regulations will be announced at the Oct. 11 Natural Resources Commission meeting in Ontonagon, Mich. For additional information on how these recommendations were developed, including full data from the public surveys, please read the Northern Pike Fishing Regulations Statewide Opinion Survey Review and Muskellunge Fishing Regulations Statewide Opinion Survey Review available at www.michigan.gov/fishing. | ||
tundrawalker00 |
| ||
Posts: 504 Location: Ludington, MI | FYI, the Esocid committee wanted a 46-inch minimum for muskies statewide but they were overruled by the public survey. Hence the unenforceable "muskie tag" which will only get put on a speared muskie if the DNR is knocking on the shanty door. | ||
smallmouth/musky |
| ||
Posts: 128 | tundrawalker00 - 9/15/2012 10:03 PM FYI, the Esocid committee wanted a 46-inch minimum for muskies statewide but they were overruled by the public survey. Hence the unenforceable "muskie tag" which will only get put on a speared muskie if the DNR is knocking on the shanty door. Guys who take fish without using their harvest tag would also take fish under a 46inch minimum size. This regulation change is a huge positive, one of, if not the most restrictive out there, and will be a big step toward establishing and maintaining the new GLS stocking efforts. | ||
smada |
| ||
Long overdue! No it wont stop the major violators but then again no regulations will. Many of the MN and WI guys don't realze the amazing potential this state has (not including LSC) as a musky destination and this is a big step towards reaching that potential. | |||
Muskie Treats |
| ||
Posts: 2384 Location: On the X that marks the mucky spot | That's excellent news! | ||
tundrawalker00 |
| ||
Posts: 504 Location: Ludington, MI | Here's the difference. If you have a 45 inch muskie with a 46-inch minimum, you're busted. If you have a 45-inch muskie under a tag system, you say, "Oops, here's my tag officer, left it in my wallet by mistake." The best reg would be a spearing ban on any lakes stocked with muskies. | ||
Guest |
| ||
tundrawalker00 - 9/20/2012 6:18 PM Here's the difference. If you have a 45 inch muskie with a 46-inch minimum, you're busted. If you have a 45-inch muskie under a tag system, you say, "Oops, here's my tag officer, left it in my wallet by mistake." The best reg would be a spearing ban on any lakes stocked with muskies. But then the tag is used so the next time they will get caught. I still think all this is a moot point as Michigan doesn't have any money to enforce these laws. There are just no wardens out there at all so people can keep whatever they want at will. | |||
JimtenHaaf |
| ||
Posts: 717 Location: Grand Rapids, MI | tundrawalker00 - 9/20/2012 7:18 PM Here's the difference. If you have a 45 inch muskie with a 46-inch minimum, you're busted. If you have a 45-inch muskie under a tag system, you say, "Oops, here's my tag officer, left it in my wallet by mistake." The best reg would be a spearing ban on any lakes stocked with muskies. One step at a time... Look at the big picture. This is probably the most restrictive muskie regulations in the entire U.S. 1 per year? That is a huge step. The spearers wanted to maintain the 1/day, and drop the statewide length down to 36". Maintaining status-quo would have been an accomplishment. But instead, we are making some great headway. | ||
tundrawalker00 |
| ||
Posts: 504 Location: Ludington, MI | Well, Hamlin Lake is never gonna take off as long as people are dropping spears on the short ones. | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
Copyright © 2024 OutdoorsFIRST Media |