Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Save the bullheads!
 
Message Subject: Save the bullheads!
DJS
Posted 8/29/2010 12:02 PM (#457220)
Subject: Save the bullheads!


http://www.startribune.com/sports/outdoors/101687188.html?elr=KArks...
My favorite is the following: "The group also fears muskies would target bullheads and reduce their populations" Funniest anti-muskie bulls!^& statement I have ever heard. Feel free to and any of your own.
leech lake strain
Posted 8/29/2010 1:03 PM (#457224 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 536


if all there lakes our loaded with bullheads what's the big deal if muskies are in one lake there? and what's with the darkhouse association against the muskies being in the five lakes! it's not like there not gonna be allowed to spear northerns still in those lakes?
happy hooker
Posted 8/29/2010 3:52 PM (#457241 - in reply to #457224)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 3147


Because Iowa people like bukllheads!!! in regards to Tetonka their afraid if the bullheads get wiped out so will the Iowa dollars
Pepper
Posted 8/29/2010 4:40 PM (#457249 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 1516


Come on it's the Bullhead Capital of the World and the world is a mighty big place. It needs protection. BTY I live in Iowa and don't like bullheads
Guest
Posted 8/29/2010 5:11 PM (#457252 - in reply to #457249)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!


If bullheads and invasive species are the only reasons they can come with to not stock Muskies, it's a slam-dunk.
shaley
Posted 8/29/2010 5:13 PM (#457253 - in reply to #457252)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!





Posts: 1184


Location: Iowa Great Lakes
Iowan here to and don't care for bullheads.....
bturg
Posted 8/30/2010 8:24 AM (#457306 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 716


So the point is to take 4 minutes and be involved grab one of the links in the other thread and write a quick note and support your fish !

or be bummmed later if it doesn't work out for lack of support
bturg
Posted 8/30/2010 10:02 AM (#457316 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 716


Here is the email link, be nice and tell them you support muskies !

[email protected]
jakejusa
Posted 8/30/2010 10:44 AM (#457325 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 994


Location: Minnesota: where it's tough to be a sportsfan!
There are fears of the unknown and fear of change also involved in this issue. The important thing is the safeguard that by stopping the stocking later on it's just a matter of time before Muskie are very scarce in the Tentonka bio mass. I can understand a fear that the lake would be visited by many high powered go fasts, and that the sleepy mornings could be disrupted. But that is not a fear and has just not proved to be the case else where either. It's almost a shame the actual opposition & stories that come out of just a few people from that area.
Troutwater
Posted 8/30/2010 11:37 AM (#457333 - in reply to #457325)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 87


Location: Minnesota Metro
I love bullheads, they make excellent flathead bait!
kriesel
Posted 8/30/2010 11:51 AM (#457340 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 5


The interesting thing about Tetonka is that there was an acidental release of Muskies about 8 years ago,from a rearing pond. I have personally caught 3 40+ inch fish from that lake
dcmusky
Posted 8/30/2010 4:16 PM (#457405 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!


See the funny thing is the Waterville city council voted against the stocking also and the said it was partially becouse of the invasive speicies that could be brought in by people comeing from Iowa or Ill. to muskie fish. But they want the Iowa bullhead fishermen. Why do you ask? The lake shore assoc. and evedentally most of Waterville is anti-fishing, The funniest thing is 3 weeks after the city council voted no to muskies the voted yes to adding more boat slips on the lake to "boost tourism". And guess what, the lake assoc. people didn't object. Seems to me they want pontoons and not fishermen. Kind of hippocritical if you ask me.
I can't understand the darkhouse being against it either as it was Erv Halstead the MDAA pres down there that was the first person to go to the DNR in Waterville and suggest this be stocked with muskies.
Dan Crooms ch54
dcmusky
Posted 8/30/2010 4:26 PM (#457407 - in reply to #457405)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!


Found this on the comments page, and about sums it up. Boy you should of been in the meeting with these people, I should write a book some day.
Is it just me...
or do the organizations mentioned in this article from the city of Waterville seem to be living in the 1950's? How many people today, under the age of 60, still want to fish for bullheads? That city wants to maintain a fishing heritage, but they reject a new opportunity that would usher it in. They don't want invasive species, but they don't mind tourists at all the resorts and campgrounds. Hypocritical. They reject the DNR's studies of muskie introduction to substitute their own reality (muskies eating all the bullheads, lol). By the way, why does it matter what the Le Sueur county board thinks? They're that against tourism? I hope the general townspeople of Waterville are more prudent than the leadership of the organizations mentioned in this article that are painting their residents as hickish rubes
dcmusky
Posted 8/30/2010 4:49 PM (#457410 - in reply to #457407)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!


There are some brains left in southern MN.
http://mankatofreepress.com/outdoors/x2014325213/Another-muskie-lak...
Muskie Treats
Posted 8/30/2010 6:23 PM (#457423 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!





Posts: 2384


Location: On the X that marks the mucky spot
It's amazing how there can be such a hatred for a fish. One that doesn't muddy up the water, reproduce at an amazing rate, jump up and hit people off their boats, etc. I wonder if these people would be this up and arms about Asian carp?
Muskiefool
Posted 8/30/2010 10:56 PM (#457455 - in reply to #457423)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!





I find it funny that the Waterville City Counsel member that pushed for the city to make a resolution to stop stocking Muskies, and also was concerned about more boats (Muskie anglers) meaning more invasive species; and how the only real concern to letting mooring rentals is there should be some restrictions on the color of the canopy's!!! Do any of these people ever listen at what they are saying?
Pepper
Posted 8/31/2010 9:47 AM (#457488 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 1516


I have heard that muskie love to munch bullhead and that would be a primary food source. Is that not true?
happy hooker
Posted 8/31/2010 9:57 AM (#457493 - in reply to #457488)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 3147


and how many eggs do bullheads eat in the spring of other panfish,, being the bottom feeders that they are
Troutwater
Posted 9/2/2010 9:49 AM (#457809 - in reply to #457488)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 87


Location: Minnesota Metro
Pepper - 8/31/2010 9:47 AM

I have heard that muskie love to munch bullhead and that would be a primary food source. Is that not true?


A lake in central IL I fish all the time used to have tons of bullhead in it, mainly small ones. The state started stocking muskie(mainly tigers) in it during the early 90's, and now they are pretty much wiped out. The biologist said the muskie love eating the bullheads.
happy hooker
Posted 9/2/2010 9:55 AM (#457814 - in reply to #457809)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 3147


troutwater
are the tigers has big has they used to be or average smaller??? thats whats happening in a couple twin cities lakes that used to have bullheads-second generation falloff
Troutwater
Posted 9/2/2010 10:43 AM (#457822 - in reply to #457814)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 87


Location: Minnesota Metro
Funny you ask that because the tigers have all pretty much died off in that lake. Now the state only stocks the pures in there. While they were in their prime though they were good healthy fish.
jakejusa
Posted 9/2/2010 1:35 PM (#457861 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 994


Location: Minnesota: where it's tough to be a sportsfan!
Lake Tetonka has a healthy population of bullheads. I can't see outside of draining this chain of lakes how the population would take a dent. There's allot of surface area there, not a small pond. In the fall when the bullheads group up in small feeding groups and are visible on the surface it's not uncommon in some parts of the lake to see 30 - 40 pods of fish working a stretch of shoreline. There's allot of B.H. in that water.

Todays the day to let your voice be heard on these five lakes. Now through the 30th.
happy hooker
Posted 9/2/2010 2:07 PM (#457864 - in reply to #457861)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 3147


Jake
the muskie WILL dent them,,,do you fish Minnetonka??? do you see bullhead rafts ever??? are you old enough to remember the bullhead rafts on tonka in the 70's pre musky??? theyl dent em in fact better get maaco!!!
Guest
Posted 9/2/2010 4:47 PM (#457889 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!


Tetonka is also full of sheephead which the DNR says is a primary forage for Muskies. I wonder how upset the lake shore homeowners will be about losing some sheephead in the bargain. ??????
Muskiefool
Posted 9/2/2010 11:07 PM (#457942 - in reply to #457889)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!





The biggest difference with these new lakes is the target in Tetonka is to have about 40 adult fish in the entire 1100 acres in 10 years.
The biggest detriment to Bullheads is quality water, if you have clean water your going to hurt the wolly bully population. Waterville cannot be the Bullhead Capitol of the world( a moniker I hear they have left off the new city sign I'm told) and have the clean water they are working towards.
This will be a fun lake if it gets stocked.
MuskieMruz
Posted 9/5/2010 1:39 PM (#458192 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 101


And I thought this post was going to be about catching and saving bullheads for late fall fishing as alternative to suckers! LOL
honkermusky
Posted 9/5/2010 8:58 PM (#458216 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: Re: Save the bullheads!




Posts: 383


Location: SE Wisc and Vilas County
i know the muskys love the bullheads in most of the lakes that i fish!!!!! Quick striked rigged bullhead???? now there's an idea.....

Edited by honkermusky 9/5/2010 8:59 PM
Luke_Chinewalker
Posted 9/7/2010 6:09 PM (#458502 - in reply to #457220)
Subject: RE: Save the bullheads!





Location: Minneapolis, MN
If you want to see what they are sending to the lake residents, see attached.


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(Waterville Letter.gif)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Waterville Letter.gif (155KB - 103 downloads)
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)