MuskieFIRST | Do we as muskie fishermen really want the WR's discredited? » General Discussion

Muskie Discussion Forums

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Moderators: Slamr	View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page] Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Do we as muskie fishermen really want the WR's discredited?

Message Subject: Do we as muskie fishermen really want the WR's discredited?

Guest

Posted 12/22/2009 10:54 AM (#413807 - in reply to #413736)
Subject: RE: Do we as muskie fishermen really want the WR's discredited?

Larry Jones,

You have either O'Brien or Williamson as the world record holder before these fish have even been researched by the WRMA! What if the true world record turns out to be a fish UNDER 60 lbs and this fish is recognized by BOTH the NFWFHF and the IGFA? Then the NY record you're so worried about wouldn't stop people from bonking fish from the waters you fish, right? This situation would also make the 60 lb. minimum for the "Modern Day Records Program meaningless also. It just might be that there has never been a muskie taken over 60 lbs and this is something for you to consider.

Larry Jones

Posted 12/22/2009 12:39 PM (#413824 - in reply to #413379)
Subject: RE: Do we as muskie fishermen really want the WR's discredited?

Guest,Yes,you could be right,but the O'Brien muskie has been gone over with a fine tooth comb in the past,but nothing came out as true facts to change the certified weight.The Wiliamson muskie may have a problem with the certification of the scale used to weigh it as well.There is also the posability of a Ceritied Unknown Muskie at 60 lbs being out there!What ever happens we will have to deal with it.Just do not need your who cares about New York attitude while we wait.

Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread