Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Fish Holds For Pics?
 
Message Subject: Fish Holds For Pics?
Slamr
Posted 1/13/2009 3:37 PM (#354803)
Subject: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 7084


Location: Northwest Chicago Burbs
Purusing the 'net, looking at pics of fish (and whatever else), wondering what pose most of you guys prefer for fish? My personal feeling is that the safety of the fish comes first (no vertical holds, not dropping the fish), I don't want to try to exaggerate the size of the fish (a 45" I catch is a 45", no matter how far I hold that fish out), while also showing the features of the fish the best I can.

Your thoughts....with examples?
BNelson
Posted 1/13/2009 3:43 PM (#354806 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Location: Contrarian Island
imo there is nothing wrong with holding the fish out from your body to make it look better, not necessarily bigger. why not make the fish look as good as it can, why hold it tight to your body only to have the fish look less than impressive...a big fish can be made to look, well, unimpressive by some of the holds and pics people get. We are out there for countless hours, countless casts, why not "show off" our prize catch a bit...not to the extent of straight arms out from your body but why not put the fish out there a bit. I try to take and get the best pics of the people's fish in my boat, to the point I have to coach most of them to get the best shot...but why not? again, why get a pic of a fish only to have you look at it later and think to yourself, that sucks, the fish was bigger than that...personally I like holds that are 45 degrees on up to straight horizontal...if somewhat vertical, the weight of the fish is supported with both hands, no straight up and down with the entire fishes weight being held by one hand....here are some examples of some fish and holds that I think work well...or just look thru some of my photo albums on here..most of my holds/pics end up being somewhat the same...but I think they look ok...not a big fan of the straight horizontal holds for all pics..gotta mix it up a little..

Edited by MSKY HNR 1/13/2009 3:49 PM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(52_5_7-11-07_(3).JPG)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(mike_11-9-08.JPG)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(49_5_a8-25-06.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 52_5_7-11-07_(3).JPG (25KB - 131 downloads)
Attachments mike_11-9-08.JPG (155KB - 127 downloads)
Attachments 49_5_a8-25-06.jpg (18KB - 123 downloads)
momuskies
Posted 1/13/2009 3:49 PM (#354807 - in reply to #354806)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?




Posts: 431


This is my favorite. Definitely on the knees to make the transition from net to pic back to water smooth.

Edited by momuskies 1/13/2009 3:54 PM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(lotw 2008 002.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments lotw 2008 002.jpg (31KB - 119 downloads)
esoxaddict
Posted 1/13/2009 3:52 PM (#354809 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: Re: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 8828


I've seen a lot of horizontal holds where the belly is all pushed in and the fish is bent all weird. Think about a fish in the water... They bend side to side, but not top to bottom. The traditional vertical hold is obviously frowned upon these days, so I think somewhere in between is probably best. For smaller fish, horizontal is fine. But on longer fish I try to keep the fish from bending too much or smashing its guts.

My favorite hold though, has to be the two armed, cradling the fish close to the body, bear hug. You know -- when the fish is just so big you can't hold it any other way...





Edited by esoxaddict 1/13/2009 3:57 PM
stormynick
Posted 1/13/2009 10:59 PM (#354896 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?




Posts: 75


like this when ur wet and cold and ur hands nice n bloody n somone says screw it take the #*^@ picture?


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(Fishh.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Fishh.jpg (49KB - 126 downloads)
MuskyTaleMike
Posted 1/13/2009 11:16 PM (#354897 - in reply to #354896)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 314


Location: Bristol, IN
I hold the "dangerous" end with my left hand. A natural instict to keep my bowling hand free from getting mangled. Attached are a couple photos, the first is a 48" while standing up. The second is a 38" while knelt down on a knee.
curleytail
Posted 1/13/2009 11:18 PM (#354898 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?




Posts: 2687


Location: Hayward, WI
I tend to be a little boring. I should try to, and have been trying to mix it up a little. In general, I hold the fish roughly horizontal - generally with the nose of the fish "up" a little higher than the tail. I have tried to take a few different shots that I do like though. With some fish, I have tried taking two pictures, each with a different hold. Some shot angles seem to show off certain fish better than others. When alone, my pictures are typically pretty much the stock horizontal hold. I know that the fish will be in the frame this way, and I have a pretty limited time to get the fish from the net and into position before the camera snaps the picture.

This year I started the kneeling pose, and really liked it a lot. Not only is it easy to get the fish from the net and back in, it seems to show the true size of the fish pretty well. So many of my previous shots came out with me saying just what BN said about taking poor pictures, "That sure makes that fish look smaller than it really was."

I have a picture of a 46 that I took by myself. I was standing, not holding the fish out at all, and I could pretty easily convice you that it was a 38 inch fish.

I'll see if I can find a few examples of my holds.

The first picture is the "bad" picture of the 46.

curleytail

EDIT: Sorry for so many pictures, but I thought it was interesting to compare different holds of the same fish. The rest may not agree, but it seems to me that the more horizontal the fish is held, the thicker/deeper the fish looks. It might be partly that when I hold a fish more horizontal, I tend to hold the head away from the camera also. I also found this year that hiding the hand that is supporting the belly makes the fish look a little fatter also. I don't think it makes the fish look heavier than it should. I always thought before that my pictures made the fish look too skinny, but when I started trying to hide my hand a little, they seemed more "true to life."





Edited by curleytail 1/13/2009 11:43 PM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(wissota46.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1850r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1847r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1856r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1857r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1877r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1879r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1895r.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(100_1896r.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments wissota46.jpg (173KB - 126 downloads)
Attachments 100_1850r.jpg (246KB - 115 downloads)
Attachments 100_1847r.jpg (254KB - 122 downloads)
Attachments 100_1856r.jpg (190KB - 117 downloads)
Attachments 100_1857r.jpg (163KB - 114 downloads)
Attachments 100_1877r.jpg (208KB - 115 downloads)
Attachments 100_1879r.jpg (198KB - 130 downloads)
Attachments 100_1895r.jpg (166KB - 123 downloads)
Attachments 100_1896r.jpg (185KB - 120 downloads)
MuskyTaleMike
Posted 1/13/2009 11:23 PM (#354899 - in reply to #354896)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 314


Location: Bristol, IN
I hold the "dangerous" end with my left hand. A natural instict to keep my bowling hand free from getting mangled. Attached are a couple photos, the first is a 48" while standing up. The second is a 38" while knelt down on a knee.


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(mike_s_48_002 (6).jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(38 vilas county wisconsin (4).jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments mike_s_48_002 (6).jpg (292KB - 125 downloads)
Attachments 38 vilas county wisconsin (4).jpg (282KB - 123 downloads)
esoxfly
Posted 1/14/2009 12:58 AM (#354910 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 1663


Location: Kodiak, AK
I fish alone, so most of my pics don't even have me in them.

(Yes, it's pike, but I really like this pic, and it's the "hold" I use most.




Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(P5310054r.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments P5310054r.jpg (52KB - 130 downloads)
nwild
Posted 1/14/2009 7:51 AM (#354925 - in reply to #354910)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 1996


Location: Pelican Lake/Three Lakes Chain
One thing I stress to all in my boat, do not leave your knees. Not only is it a bit quicker from net to picture back to water, but in the odd occurence that you may let one get away from your grip, the drop is much shorter. Of course the solution is not to let one get away from you, but if it does....



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(49self.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(tedtiger.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 49self.jpg (45KB - 126 downloads)
Attachments tedtiger.jpg (59KB - 121 downloads)
Hammskie
Posted 1/14/2009 8:30 AM (#354932 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 697


Location: Minnetonka
I agree w/ momuskies in saying that the safest, kindest way to hold a muskie is from your knees. It makes the transition from the net back to the water a lot smoother. Also... muskies rarely want to be held up here in gravity land, so if one does happen to wriggle loose, you'll have a lot better control over her when you're kneeling... and she won't have as far to fall.

IMO: There is no reason to ever stand up with a muskie.

Put the MuskieFIRST. Horizontal 4 LIFE!!!

Edited by Hammskie 1/14/2009 8:48 AM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(sunday_fish.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments sunday_fish.jpg (102KB - 118 downloads)
jamie
Posted 1/14/2009 8:58 AM (#354939 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: Re: Fish Holds For Pics?




Posts: 43


Location: Warrenville,IL
Here's a couple articles I did on the subject.
Enjoy the...um...fish.
http://www.customfish.com/2007/07/proper-fish-handling.html
http://www.customfish.com/2008/03/picture-article.html

I hope that helps out.
There's nothing worse than getting a bad shot of a great memory.
Joe Cal
Posted 1/14/2009 2:38 PM (#355030 - in reply to #354803)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?





Posts: 294


Location: Bloomer, Wi
I like this hold, it just feels right


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(tonka 48.5.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments tonka 48.5.jpg (101KB - 118 downloads)
CASTING55
Posted 1/14/2009 4:24 PM (#355041 - in reply to #355030)
Subject: RE: Fish Holds For Pics?




Posts: 968


Location: N.FIB
as long as your supporting the fish with both hands I think your fine with whatever hold,some people will disagree but everybody is different.
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)