|
|
| i read in outdoor notebook that the 10hp restriction was to be changed to a no wake. but there web site states that the hp restriction will remain .does anyone have more info on this subject. chris cpr |
|
| |
|
| It was my understanding that they had some kind of a vote locally and guess who showed up and out voted the no-wake idea?, yep you guessed it, a ton of guys who didn't want to see their little lake invaded with big boats. I'm a little dissapointed because it may have helped to set a precedent which may have lead no-wake proposals for other big lakes like Evergreen which can be a real bear to get around on with only a trolling motor. |
|
| |
|
| It's discrimination pure and simple and as someone wrote to a magazine recently in the paper, we go elsewhere. They lose our money. To bad, I would frequent these lakes more to but the 10hp discrimination rule has to be there. These rules make absolutely no sense. No wake is the way to go. |
|
| |
|
| The 10 hp limit is "STILL" in effect.
You can use your big motor only to load and unload the boat. |
|
| |
|
| Just another example of bureaucracy in action. A decission made in response to whomever screams the loudest, not what the majority wanted. |
|
| |
|
| Musky99:
From what i observed in this case...you are right about that! I was for the change since it makes sense. Oh well, i have a kicker motor so TTTHHHEWPPTTT!!! [:devil:] |
|
| |
