Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Phantom Red Power Pro
 
Message Subject: Phantom Red Power Pro
Marshall
Posted 1/28/2007 10:36 AM (#234666)
Subject: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 406


Location: Stones throw away...finally!!
I was wondering if anyone has tried the Phantom Red Power Pro. The information that they provide makes sense, but I would love to hear if anyone has tried it (with success). I have always used the Moss Green, but the Red intrigues me. Thanks for the help.
California_Muskie
Posted 1/28/2007 10:52 AM (#234668 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 299


Location: Ontario, California
I haven't but i've been thinking lately..... with the craze of red hooks that are supposed to attract bites because of the color, now red line that it supposed to disappear? Whose gimmic is better. Personally I believe that red is the first color to disappear in the water column or at least wash out.

I guess it really doesn't matter to me because I don't buy into the red hook theory and I still have a couple thousand yards of green Tuf-Line.

Edited by California_Muskie 1/28/2007 10:53 AM
muskie_man
Posted 1/28/2007 11:21 AM (#234671 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 1237


Location: South Portsmouth, KY
http://muskie.outdoorsfirst.com/board/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=29...
sworrall
Posted 1/29/2007 10:21 PM (#234938 - in reply to #234671)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 32930


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Interesting how some ads say one thing a color is supposed to do, and other advertise near the opposite...
Pointerpride102
Posted 1/29/2007 10:25 PM (#234942 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 16632


Location: The desert
Red color is the first to scatter with depth. The only colors that are really left at 25m is purples and blues....(why the ocean is blue) Red is gone the fastest....I personally dont think line color, hook color or any of that hoop la makes a difference.
curleytail
Posted 1/29/2007 10:45 PM (#234946 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro




Posts: 2687


Location: Hayward, WI
I think the question is what depth DOES red wash out at? Does it depend on water clairty and sunlight? Sure, red might be the first, but if it doesn't wash out until 10 or 15 feet, a very large percentage of my musky fishing is shallower than that. In that case, red hooks might give the "blood red" appearance everyone talks about, but the line would still be visable.

With all the talk about red hooks, my theory is this: If red does wash out within 10 feet or less, red hooks work because the fish CAN'T see them, not because they trigger them to strike. Red hooks seem pretty popular with walleye anglers using live bait. If you are livebaiting in 15 feet of water, and the fish see nothing but the bait, I would assume more strikes would occur.

I have another question. Why does line color matter for musky fishing unless you are using Flouro leaders? I would think a fish would be more likely to see the large snap connected to a solid wire leader, which is all hooked to my bait, than they are to notice the line a foot in front of it.

Interesting topic. Makes me want to do some "red research."

curleytail
sworrall
Posted 1/29/2007 10:48 PM (#234947 - in reply to #234946)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 32930


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
I've done a ton of work with color underwater. SOOOOO many variables, including the 'when' and 'how' muskies see color, etc...etc...
Pointerpride102
Posted 1/29/2007 11:17 PM (#234951 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 16632


Location: The desert
The color red gives off a 650 nm wavelength. I attached a graph of where wavelegths scatter/become unseen under ocean water. I imagine that the darker the water the less it penetrates.


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(underwater spectrum.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments underwater spectrum.jpg (45KB - 167 downloads)
sworrall
Posted 1/29/2007 11:25 PM (#234953 - in reply to #234951)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 32930


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Add light penetration angle( time of day, time of year), particulate, wave action, and a bunch of other variables, and red is frequently gone in a couple feet of water.
curleytail
Posted 1/30/2007 12:28 AM (#234957 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro




Posts: 2687


Location: Hayward, WI
If you say that in most cases red is gone in a couple feet than I would say the blood red hooks work because the fish don't see them.

As for the case of red line, are fish more likely to see the line or the leader? Not necessarily looking for an answer, just thinking outloud.

curleytail
Will Schultz
Posted 1/30/2007 7:58 AM (#234976 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Location: Grand Rapids, MI
The answers you seek are likely in the other thread that was posted above.

Just because the color dissapears doesn't mean it becomes invisible. The "color" red isn't visible anymore, it has now become a gray/green (underwater). It's not like red is some kind of magic color that makes things invisible underwater... though some line compnaies would lead you to believe that. The real reason for the line is so that it's more visible above water.
Pointerpride102
Posted 1/30/2007 8:39 AM (#234986 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 16632


Location: The desert
How many people actually think fish "see" the line? I honestly believe that they dont even care about the line or the leader and cant really see it at all. Think about it.....how many of you have had fish enter a figure 8 or chase up to the boat? Dont you think that the boat and your rod in the water are SO much bigger and more noticeable than a few millimeter in diameter line and a leader??
sworrall
Posted 1/30/2007 9:03 AM (#234990 - in reply to #234986)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 32930


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Pointer thinks somewhat along the same lines as I do. The logic goes like this:

Red is good on hooks. Makes the fish think the prey they see is wounded.
Problem 1) We don't know what the fish actually react to here, especially in the case of a Muskie with their poor olfactory senses.
2) The red on the hooks doesn't actually match the color of any injury
3) The bait doesn't behave like a wounded anything, doesn't swim like one, sound like one, look like one, or in any manner really mimic a wounded or for that matter healthy baitfish.
and so on...

Conversely, red is good beacuse the fish won't see the hooks as readily.
1) This takes the HUGE leap that fish know what a hook is and that they worry about them.

Line is red, this is good...

Why? Why not blue for sunny days and white to gray for cloudy days?

Anthropomorphism. That's how most concepts like these are sold to us. We lend human attributes to Muskies, and expect they will react and reason, think and see, hear and behave as we would if WE were THEM.
RiverMan
Posted 1/30/2007 9:48 AM (#235001 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro




Posts: 1504


Location: Oregon
I tend to agree with you Pointer. I think if fish were smart enough to say to themselves "hey there's some fishing line" we wouldn't be able to catch any of them! But, I have fished some crystal clear waters in Idaho for trout where if you weren't using a 4# tippet or lighter you wouldn't touch a thing!

RM
Pointerpride102
Posted 1/30/2007 10:10 AM (#235009 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 16632


Location: The desert
Perhaps the use of a 4lb tippet causes your bait to flow more naturaly through the stream than a larger tippet would. A larger tippet could create more drag in the water and cause the bait to act much differently in the current.

I have talked to guys up in canada when walleye fishing that said if you had anything heavier than 6lb test on you wouldnt catch many walleyes. So me being a dumb kid and having 20lb line on throwing 1/8th ounce jigs really defied all odds by catching over 50 in something like a half hour?

Fishing companies use these gimicks to attract fisherman. And they do this rightfully so because it flat out works. Do I think fish care about color of line, thickness of line etc? Nope, but will I still by "invisible underwater line" and thinner diameter line and blood red hooks? Most likely. Why? Because it appeals to me and makes me think I'm doing all that I can to better my odds.
MACK
Posted 1/30/2007 10:12 AM (#235012 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro




Posts: 1086


Like the Moss Green Power Pro...the color is gone within the first few outings on the water and you're left with gray colored line...so...with the red Power Pro, I'd guess that the color would be gone soon as well and leave you with a faded pink color? Regardless...it won't stay that color long. I've used the yellow Power Pro and bright yellow monofilament for other species for several years..and still catch fish.....whether the line is clear, green, blue, gray, yellow, red.....I see it more as a marketing gimic to "catch" the angler than the fish...
Obfuscate Musky
Posted 1/30/2007 10:54 AM (#235019 - in reply to #234976)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro




Posts: 654


Location: MPLS, MN
Will Schultz - 1/30/2007 7:58 AM

It's not like red is some kind of magic color that makes things invisible underwater...


lol
esoxaddict
Posted 1/30/2007 11:07 AM (#235024 - in reply to #234666)
Subject: RE: Phantom Red Power Pro





Posts: 8833


If they're not afraid of the leader, the hooks, the snap, the lip on a crankbait, or the boat, the line (or what color it is) isn't going to be a deal breaker.

It's a brilliant marketing ploy, developed by guys who are spart enough to realize that people are dumb enough to believe that the color of their fishing line will help them fool something with a brain the size of a gumball...

I might buy the red line, however. I get tired of green fingers in the spring, and besides, it might look cool on a couple of my reels. Personally I think that white color that all line fades to eventually suits the fish just fine.
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)