Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Cast Length?
 
Message Subject: Cast Length?
BettieBait
Posted 10/25/2005 3:21 PM (#163513)
Subject: Cast Length?




Posts: 41


When do you guys and gals find that a short cast is the best choice, versus a long bomb?

BB
Crash_McGolden
Posted 10/25/2005 3:34 PM (#163515 - in reply to #163513)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?





Posts: 127


Location: NW burbs of Chicago
When I've just seen a fish go by? But then again, I've been working on trying to have longer casts sans backlashes this year, so that's mostly what I've been doing.

Crash McG
Beaver
Posted 10/25/2005 4:41 PM (#163524 - in reply to #163515)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?





Posts: 4266


When I target something. A shorter cast is much more accurate.
Throwing at a log, or stump, or milfoil edge or pocket...I'll make much shorter casts.
Beav
esox50
Posted 10/25/2005 5:09 PM (#163530 - in reply to #163513)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?





Posts: 2024


Fishing stump fields or laydowns short casts are a necessity. Think about it. It's easier to toss a bean bag in a trash can 10 feet away than it is if the trashcan were 60' away. Hit each branch or stump precisely and from different angles. This can only be accomplished by "sniping" the structure.

Also, thick, sloppy weedbeds are not conducive for long-bomb casts. You have less control over your bait and it is harder to hit pockets or other small nuances in the weedbed.
The Handyman
Posted 10/25/2005 6:14 PM (#163534 - in reply to #163513)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?




Posts: 1046


Also shorter casts work better in heavy current situations and in gale force winds. I see alot of fishers drifting with a very heavy wind and making a football cast in those 2' waves, not good as you loose alot of control and feel! I think you possible can miss alot of fish, going long!
sworrall
Posted 10/25/2005 8:42 PM (#163546 - in reply to #163534)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?





Posts: 32886


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Unless I am parallel to a long breakline or weedline, I usually fire LOTS of short casts at where I feel the fish should be. Long casts are the exception for me unless topwater fishing on large expanses of good water.
musky_grrr
Posted 11/3/2005 12:13 PM (#164396 - in reply to #163513)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?




Posts: 18


I have been working a lot on boat control this season, and one of the things I'm trying to learn is about doing a better job covering an area. Because of that, I have found myself making much shorter casts because I know I will be doing several runs through an area covering the various depths. I think that has been more successful of a technique for me, as you have more control over the bait, and it also forces you to spend more time targeting a specific area rather than plowing through there once and giving up because you didn't see a fish.
Steve Van Lieshout
Posted 11/3/2005 3:05 PM (#164402 - in reply to #163513)
Subject: RE: Cast Length?




Posts: 1916


Location: Greenfield, WI
I agree with Senior Worrall.
The Slammer Third Theorum of Fishing is: The longer the cast the higher the likelihood that your bait will catch a weed on one of the hooks within the first three feet of the retrieve!
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)