Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> Lures,Tackle, and Equipment -> The case for 65lb test or thinner???
 
Message Subject: The case for 65lb test or thinner???
happy hooker
Posted 10/27/2018 5:42 PM (#921890)
Subject: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 3147


I've used 80-100 lb line exclusively for 20 years,,,
I'm wondering if you guys have found ANY advantage to smaller diameter lines on standard size or regular muskie fishing reels not finesse techniques,,does the thinner diameter make for higher retrieve speed-less diameter lost after the cast or do you feel a little more vibration from your blades,cranks etc or any other type of advantage??
gregk9
Posted 10/27/2018 7:32 PM (#921896 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???





Posts: 791


Location: North Central IL USA
With 40 pound test power pro on my Curado 300ej I can bomb double 7 inline spinners. Casting distance is the benefit I like from going with a smaller diameter.
Fishysam
Posted 10/27/2018 9:13 PM (#921907 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 1209


Also it will pick up a lot less water and that's important when it's cold
Fishysam
Posted 10/27/2018 9:16 PM (#921909 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 1209


More depth on my buck tails as well with 65 over 80, I will probably only use 80 on rubber rods instead of 100 and 65 on the rest of my setups. Except I may go less on really big bass stuff I can finesse with
muskihntr
Posted 10/28/2018 9:54 AM (#921942 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 2037


Location: lansing, il
I would say 80 to 90 percent of the Hi Seas Braid in 65# test that we sell during the Musky Show season, is to guys who are able to start fishing in very early Spring, or have open seasons year round where throwing the smaller sized lures like Rattle Baits and smaller Twitch and Glide baits are common.
NPike
Posted 10/28/2018 11:01 AM (#921947 - in reply to #921942)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 612


I use 40# Suffix 832. Never had a problem in many years. With a good rod and drag set right no reason ya can't pull in the big one. The biggest fish I've seen was 50" was actually caught on 20# mono, by my bud. The advantage hands down is that better for casting yet heavy enough for the 6" to 9" baits. Mind ya 4 oz. is my heaviest bait.
Ciscokid82
Posted 10/28/2018 2:42 PM (#921958 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???





Posts: 333


Location: SE Wisc
Definitely matching line with reel to rod gives you best action on lures
pklingen
Posted 10/28/2018 5:27 PM (#921964 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 864


Location: NE Ohio
i've used 50# masterbraid for years. that's some tough stuff!
ToddM
Posted 10/29/2018 12:40 PM (#922017 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???





Posts: 20218


Location: oswego, il
What baits do you want to throw? I would not use 65 for pounders, a.mag dawg maybe but you will lose it on a backlash. 8 and 10" cranks with 65 in the winter gives you less water on your reel. Really the only reason to use it unless you are downsizing baits.
14ledo81
Posted 10/29/2018 2:03 PM (#922023 - in reply to #922017)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???





Posts: 4269


Location: Ashland WI
ToddM - 10/29/2018 12:40 PM

What baits do you want to throw? I would not use 65 for pounders, a.mag dawg maybe but you will lose it on a backlash. 8 and 10" cranks with 65 in the winter gives you less water on your reel. Really the only reason to use it unless you are downsizing baits.


I agree with Todd on this.

Remember the strong line is not necessarily for fighting the fish, but to be able to withstand the force put on it from repetitive casting of heavy lures.
tkuntz
Posted 10/29/2018 4:32 PM (#922039 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: Re: The case for 65lb test or thinner???




Posts: 815


Location: Waukee, IA
I run 65lb on my MH action rod for oversized bass jigs, smaller topwaters, smaller spinners, shallow raiders etc. Helps casting distance with light baits. I would never use it for rubber, big bucktails or anything over 2 ounces that is prone to causing backlash.
Raider150
Posted 11/3/2018 5:33 PM (#922532 - in reply to #921890)
Subject: RE: The case for 65lb test or thinner???





Posts: 434


Location: searchin for 50
Cortland musky master 35# dacron was the standard for many years! Food for thought!
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)