Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: which 115?

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
sworrall
Posted 10/31/2021 10:20 AM (#997833 - in reply to #996532)
Subject: Re: which 115?





Posts: 32801


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
CincySkeez - 10/17/2021 8:50 PM

If you can afford it Mercury makes the best performing engine, no doubt. But there's a reason they use mules instead of thoroughbreds to move stuff across mountain passes. That I feel is an apt comparison.


The HP being discussed is a 115, not a 350. I have a 60. Sips fuel, runs my 1625 dual console Lund Fury with two anglers at 30 MPH. Starts every time, planes the boat well with a tin 4 blade prop, and has plenty of low-end power. Must be a hybrid horse/mule.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)