Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Lowrance vs Hummingbird mega SI

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Glaucus_
Posted 1/24/2018 3:34 PM (#890461 - in reply to #890310)
Subject: Re: Lowrance vs Hummingbird mega SI




Posts: 135


Matt Cook works in promotions for Johnson Outdoors, something that should be considered when reading his comments. I wish pro-staff, employees, or others with business relationships would identify themselves as such.

I have used side imaging along time and feel I am fairly good at interpreting the data that is displayed. I also know I do not need to count the twigs on a branch to know its a tree.

Exactly! Comparing the differences in level of detail on SI images is foolish at this point, imho. It's a "great vs greater" debate that gets falsely presented as if it's a "good vs bad" argument.

I think the differences that matter to actual owners lie in other functionality: Screen speed, ease of screen navigation, sonar target separation, ability to network with a particular trolling motor, mapping features, recording maps on uncharted waters, etc. For me, the combination of Humminbird/MinnKota/Lakemaster for follow-the-contour and map depth highlights are some of the most muskie-fishing-useful features available.


Edited by Glaucus_ 1/24/2018 3:36 PM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)