Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Recon vs Tuffy

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Paul S
Posted 8/9/2017 9:33 AM (#873634 - in reply to #873630)
Subject: Re: Recon vs Tuffy




Posts: 229


Location: Tinley Park, IL
Glaucus_ - 8/9/2017 9:07 AM

Could you share your evidence for this? (That Recons, Rangers, Skeeters, or whatever are breaking their hulls/transoms at a higher rate than Tuffys.) All brands have some issues, it's most often a small percentage that get over-generalized; considering how they get used, it's actually amazing that there aren't more problems. The question for the end-user is: does the "tough as hell" Tuffy experience this less often?


Are you talking about QC issues or strength of hull? Either way, I highly doubt you will get the data you are looking for.

My opinion of the "tough as hell" Tuffy hull is based on what I have seen with a couple different Tuffys versus incidents I have read about with other boat brands. Yes, it is all anecdotal but this is how I formed my opinion.

Edited by Paul S 8/9/2017 9:35 AM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)