Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: X-190 Motor Choice

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Paul S
Posted 1/7/2016 4:20 PM (#798558 - in reply to #798538)
Subject: Re: X-190 Motor Choice




Posts: 228


Location: Tinley Park, IL
kjgmh - 1/7/2016 2:08 PM

I'll go against the grain. A lot of boats will perform just fine without max HP. If you prop it properly you will be able to get a decent hole shot and what sounds like an acceptable top end. If you know this up front and it makes $$ sense, go for it.


I'm not sure. I have heard several places that this boats will do mid 50s with a 150. This thread has definitely given me more to think about.

I just don't understand all the variables and how they affect performance. You have 18' tin deep Vs that weigh a couple hundred lbs more than the X-190 and they have a max HP rating of 150. There's even the Skeeter WX-1850 that weighs 1900 lbs (600 more than the X-190) and it has a max HP rating of 150. How do these boats perform with a 150 when they have a comparable hull and an even heavier weight? The X-190 is longer and narrower- is that the difference why these other boats can get away with having a smaller HP and still have acceptable performance?

(Delete all cookies set by this site)