Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: triton vs ranger?

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
jonnysled
Posted 6/11/2013 9:35 AM (#645920 - in reply to #645918)
Subject: Re: triton vs ranger?





Posts: 13688


Location: minocqua, wi.
a tuffy esox mag fishes bigger than a 620 with a full windshield ... sorry, a huge ranger fan but a 619-620 with full windshields is an enormous space waster throughout their brand. too much fishing area is taken by console and floor space. from the molding to the nose isn't much different and fishing right next to a guy especially on eagle could be the difference between a hay-maker and a day you wish you could forget. i've witnessed it first-hand.

having comfort to keep your eyes dry on a ride vs. fishing performance ... unless you are working the back of the boat trolling or fishing with a family with chics and kids as stated above (which is why full windshields are offered), you sacrifice fishing performance and if you hit it hard, it will eventually cost you.

teach the wife to drive it or hope her name isn't sally and get a single console like you want.


(Delete all cookies set by this site)