Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Navionics vs others

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
tswoboda
Posted 8/7/2012 9:51 AM (#576444 - in reply to #576431)
Subject: Re: Navionics vs others




Posts: 349


I'll clarify...

I'm not saying Navionics numbers for their own data is incorrect.

What I'm saying is what they have for the other companies listed is incorrect, particularly Lowrance Insight.
A quick trip to Lowrance's website shows well over 1000 lakes WITH CONTOURS for MN and 250~300 of those lakes being high def.
What does Navionics list for Lowrance Insight?? 603 lakes in MN with contours and ZERO HD lakes.
It aggravates me when company A will post pretty important statistics comparing themselves to company B, and use false data for company B. Call it good advertising, but to me that is a low blow. If a company is going to talk about it's competition, at least be honest about it.

Also notice how ND and SD were left out of the graph... just so happens that the Lake Insight chip is better in those states which do have popular fishing destinations.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)