Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: New 4 strokes vs new 2 strokes?

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Almost-B-Good
Posted 8/1/2012 6:37 AM (#575199 - in reply to #575179)
Subject: RE: New 4 strokes vs new 2 strokes?




Posts: 433


Location: Cedarburg, Wisconsin
Don't waste the cash rebuilding it. It was a fine motor in its day but that's ancient history. The new E-TEC 2 strokes will purr like a kitten compared to the old Johnson while giving you probably around 30% greater fuel efficiency. No warm up, no stumbling on acceleration, just turn the key and fish. For 17 years I ran a '91 Fast Strike 150, a great motor that's still running strong, but my 2008 200HO E-TEC crushes it for fuel consumption frugality and when you start, there's no trademark cloud of smoke before the Hi Ho Silver and Away!

The only thing to watch is the HP rating. Back in the "good old days" they way under rated the motors to where my '91 was close to 20% more HP than decaled on the shroud. That changed and now "X" HP is "X" HP, or a HO version is up to 10% more max.

Lots of good motors out there now to choose from.

Edited by Almost-B-Good 8/1/2012 6:52 AM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)