Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Lund Predator 1810 vs 1675 Impact SS

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Wood_Duck
Posted 2/4/2012 11:03 PM (#536828 - in reply to #536654)
Subject: Re: Lund Predator 1810 vs 1675 Impact SS





Posts: 555


Location: Tennessee
Yea that is definately a thought on the width. I use to think an 80ish" track was wide enough, but after getting in a couple with 92-95" the difference is pretty dang nice. For anyone who's been on the water in the Alumacrafts, how stable are they moving around on the deck and such? Alot of roll, more or less than the Lunds? I know the Lunds advertise stability quite abit standing on the gunnels and such which I know they also have a ton of floatation since they can drill one full of holes and still float it. I know alot of it might be overboard for advertisement but I'll admit, marketing like that does speak alot to me anyways. And anytime I see guide boats, it's always Lund. Never saw an Alumacraft. I'm use to bassboat stability right now. Been originally looking at a Pro 185 Alumacraft ModV but I'm really leaning more on the deep v for storage and safety especially with my little boy being old enough to fish in about 2 more years.

Edited by Wood_Duck 2/5/2012 11:53 PM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)