Posts: 2323
Location: Stevens Point, WI | NMG - 12/25/2011 1:56 PM
Thanks for the replies folks! I'm definitely going to max out the HP on whichever I choose. Mike, I had considered that but going that route would put me roughly $4K to $5K more (1625 vs 1725) than the Navigator with the E-TEC. It would appear that the Merc's are heavily discounted when you package them up with the Lund's, so to go with just the hull and then add a different make engine afterwards, you almost get hit twice (the base boat being more plus you loose out on the discounting for the engine). Because of that, if I went Lund, it would have to be with the Merc, which I think is a bit of a downgrade from the E-TEC in some respects.
I wish I were rich, LOL :)
In what ways do you think the Merc is a downgrade?
The Merc fourstroke or the Optimax will get better fuel economy than the E-Tec. If you don't like the little extra weight of the 75 Merc Forstroke than I would suggest going to the 75 Mercury Optimax. All three motors are within 80lbs, the Fourstroke being 399. You'll get the best fuel economy, holeshot and for sure the best overall performance with that motor. It will or typically is the cheapest motor when you compare with any other brands. I'd certainly compare the Optimax and the E-Tec, thats more apples to apples than the 75 Fourstroke. Pair the Optimax with the big tiller handle and you've got an awesome setup.
Don't forget, Mercury has a much better dealer presence nation wide than Evinrude, something to keep in mind.
I wouldn't hesitate to own another Alumacreft, very good boat. I've never really ever heard of anyone having issues with one, very solid boat IMO. |
