Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: how valuable is side and down imaging

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
jwelch
Posted 7/11/2011 11:51 PM (#506711 - in reply to #506490)
Subject: RE: how valuable is side and down imaging




Posts: 233


Location: Iowa
It isn't a necessity, probably the way gps is nowadays. I have the HDS/structure scan and it is a valuable tool to have in the boat and and is worth the money. Most of the time I have the screen split between gps and structure scan. It shows everything with a lot more clarity and you can tell exactly what those red and yellow blobs are on your 2d sonar. Structure will also be alot easier to pick apart especially with side scan.

If you decide against it and you decide to go with a lowrance unit. At least you have the option of adding it later.

The picture is of a rock bar in MN. One of things about side scan is the shallower the water, the less effective it is. As you can see in the picture. Pay no attention to the range numbers on the bottom of the screen. I wonder myself why they put those on there. But on top of the bar it is pretty blurry to the shallow side but to the drop off side it is pretty clear and can see rocks all the way to the rightside of the screen.


Jeremy



Edited by jwelch 7/12/2011 12:13 AM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(shot 5.2.png)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments shot 5.2.png (197KB - 181 downloads)

(Delete all cookies set by this site)