Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


 Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Yake Bait
Posted 3/27/2010 9:51 AM (#431326 - in reply to #429400)
Subject: Re: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft





Posts: 388


I own a 2004 1750 Fishhawk (which is now sold as the 1700 model). Overall I have been very pleased with this boat. Probably the main differences is that the Fishhawk has more length to the front deck with the console set more towards the middle of the boat. The Navigator maintains more width in the forward portion of the boat (Fishhawks have a wedge shape tapering from the transom to the bow).

Only thing I wish I could change on it is ability to lay rods down on the starboard side. When fishing two guys with multiple rods, space to keep rods is an issue. Not sure if the Navigator offers any advantages to this end. I think that storage is probably a wash as the Navigator has dual side rod lockers while the new Fishhawk have center rod storage plus a side rod locker.

Can't go wrong with either choice.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)