Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Lund 186 Fisherman GL VS. Ranger 1860 Angler

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
bturg
Posted 1/29/2009 6:47 PM (#358096 - in reply to #357212)
Subject: Re: Lund 186 Fisherman GL VS. Ranger 1860 Angler




Posts: 719


I'll stand by my statements, I have mounted a few items on the non-solid core Transoms and after getting thru the initial skin there is very little resistance till you hit the glass skin on the far side, just not the best as far as I am concerned. The Ranger hull like the majority of glass boats is made in two pieces and then bonded together... as I stated above the construction process used creates a one piece feel not a one piece unit as it does have two halves are bonded together and foam injected to creat maximum performance and a more ridgid unit that will perform and feel like a solid piece. Brunswick (the Lund Parent company) bought Triton a few years back and they certainly share some ideas in design and construction. I am not saying the Lund will not perform but simply pointing out differences for a prospective buyer to consider.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)