Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Univesal sonar vs. Regular Transducer

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
TJ DeVoe
Posted 3/13/2008 1:10 PM (#307216 - in reply to #307205)
Subject: Re: Univesal sonar vs. Regular Transducer




Posts: 2323


Location: Stevens Point, WI
I'm just saying I don't get the detail that a regular transducer would get when using the universal sonar. I mark less stuff with the universal sonar. I'll go over it with my trolling motor, and then go over it with my console unit and it never shows the detail like my console sonar. Like I said previous, for what I need it for, it does the job. But if I were fishing on a professional walleye trail of some sort, I wouldn't be running universal sonar thats for sure. The universal sonar is good, but it DOES NOT beat the real mccoy of a Lowrance transducer strapped to the bottom of the trolling motor! I've used that built in sonar since it came out, I personally can tell a difference.

Edited by Merckid 3/13/2008 1:11 PM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)