Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Univesal sonar vs. Regular Transducer

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
TJ DeVoe
Posted 3/13/2008 12:03 PM (#307184 - in reply to #307177)
Subject: RE: Univesal sonar vs. Regular Transducer




Posts: 2323


Location: Stevens Point, WI
Reef Hawg - 3/13/2008 11:35 AM

Shep, even you inferred then, that there is a difference. If I have to tweak my sens. up to get what I want, I now lost out on the top end as I cannot go up as high as I'd like to, or my unit would allow. I normally run my units at a very high sensitivity to begin with, and filter the crap(clutter) in my mind, as I don't want to 'miss' anything. Due to a loss of sensitivity in the Universal sonar, this isn't possible. It is a lossy application in truth, no matter the settings, but again, a great feature and a great convenience.


Reef Hawg, you absolutely couldn't have said it any better. There is a difference. I've played with my sensitivity, I've done everything I could to make it better but could never get the detail I could get with the original transducer. Argue all you want, it's not the same. However, the U2 has gotten better.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)